Guest HungryJack Posted February 4, 2004 Report Posted February 4, 2004 does Yodaler even post anymoew Jack? I haven't seen him anywhere In ages. Cerebus is cool though. And Dymand as a mod? god no. Sorry man, I'd take Dave as a mod over you . Any day of the week, twice on Sunday.
Art Sandusky Posted February 4, 2004 Report Posted February 4, 2004 The problem (besides the idea of moderators here) is that you're all nominating people who, more than often with the exception of Piss, actually get into it with people here. I'd rather see someone who visits this folder often and posts as well but stays out of/above fighting to be the moderator.
Slayer Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 HD shouldn't have mods. It goes against the whole "purpose" of HD to begin with, i.e. (almost) no-rules Yeah, but someone needs to keep an eye on idiots like you... And someone needs to keep an eye on no-good limeys like you
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 does Yodaler even post anymoew Jack? I haven't seen him anywhere In ages. Cerebus is cool though. And Dymand as a mod? god no. Sorry man, I'd take Dave as a mod over you . Any day of the week, twice on Sunday. Probably. I just don't like him. And In case people are getting the wrong idea here.... I don't want to be a mod. I'd rather be able to goof around and have fun instead of making sure everyone's following the rules. If Dames asked me to I'd consider it but otherwise I wouldn't want to
DerangedHermit Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 My choices? Hoff, JSYK and FrozenBlockofPiss.......
Angle-plex Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 Why not Board Administrator Stephen Popick?
Hank Kingsley Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 I concur with Angle-plex. Not only can Popick be a fun-loving guy, as seen in Exhibit A: but he can be a serious, diplomatic moderator, as seen in the popular Exhibit B: Popick is also good-hearted in his flaming. When one Angle-plex and one The Superstar were making fun of the above picture, Popick was quoted as saying "We're smiling because you guys our sucking are wing-wangs." That's the quality we need moderating the Hardcore Discussion folder.
k thx Posted February 5, 2004 Author Report Posted February 5, 2004 The problem (besides the idea of moderators here) is that you're all nominating people who, more than often with the exception of Piss, actually get into it with people here. I'd rather see someone who visits this folder often and posts as well but stays out of/above fighting to be the moderator. But where's the fun in that?
Hank Kingsley Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 He could be the Sheriff Austin to our smartmarks.com
Guest stardust Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 Have I missed something here? Seriously...apparently Banky's gone, Chave's randomly gone all heel on us, and y'all want mods for HD? I guess this is what I get for not posting at TSM very frequently here lately. Oh, and if I had to choose, I would say Hoff and Mr. Piss definitely.
Dr. Tom Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 Two things: 1. I don't think HD needs forum mods, and I think most of the staff would agree with me. 2. Forum mods can't ban anyone (only global mods and admins can), so your concerns about certain people abusing their power like that are unfounded. Besides, we'd never appoint a forum mod we thought would go all wacky on us.
k thx Posted February 5, 2004 Author Report Posted February 5, 2004 Besides, we'd never appoint a forum mod we thought would go all wacky on us. Bugger.
Dr. Tom Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 Besides, we'd never appoint a forum mod we thought would go all wacky on us. Bugger. Bollocks.
Red Hot Thumbtack In The Eye Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 This entire discussion calls for a masterbating bear. This will fit my sig motif nicely
Slayer Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 Besides, we'd never appoint a forum mod we thought would go all wacky on us. Bugger. Bollocks. Cheerio
k thx Posted February 5, 2004 Author Report Posted February 5, 2004 Besides, we'd never appoint a forum mod we thought would go all wacky on us. Bugger. Bollocks. Cheerio Cor blimey!
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 Besides, we'd never appoint a forum mod we thought would go all wacky on us. Anglesault OaOast Mods 31-January 02 16293 Pardon Tom?
Slayer Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 Besides, we'd never appoint a forum mod we thought would go all wacky on us. Bugger. Bollocks. Cheerio Cor blimey! Bloody 'ell
k thx Posted February 5, 2004 Author Report Posted February 5, 2004 Besides, we'd never appoint a forum mod we thought would go all wacky on us. Bugger. Bollocks. Cheerio Cor blimey! Bloody 'ell This is why we need Hardcore Discussion mods. Wanker.
Cherry Blossom Viscount Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 Besides, we'd never appoint a forum mod we thought would go all wacky on us. Anglesault OaOast Mods 31-January 02 16293 Pardon Tom? OAOAST mod? He's harmless in that position. And you kind of have to give him that title since it is kind of his legacy around here.
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 Besides, we'd never appoint a forum mod we thought would go all wacky on us. Anglesault OaOast Mods 31-January 02 16293 Pardon Tom? OAOAST mod? He's harmless in that position. And you kind of have to give him that title since it is kind of his legacy around here. I don't know why since I was the one who did all the work...
Slayer Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 Wanker. Tosser I rule and you know it, bitch
Art Sandusky Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 Besides, we'd never appoint a forum mod we thought would go all wacky on us. Goddammit. I'm wacky all the time, so does that eliminate me from going wacky after being appointed?
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 Besides, we'd never appoint a forum mod we thought would go all wacky on us. Goddammit. I'm wacky all the time, so does that eliminate me from going wacky after being appointed? Kotz as mod...the next sign of tsm's death.
Art Sandusky Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 Besides, we'd never appoint a forum mod we thought would go all wacky on us. Goddammit. I'm wacky all the time, so does that eliminate me from going wacky after being appointed? Kotz as mod...the next sign of tsm's death. I'd actually like to think I'd be very capable.
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 You probably would be. I mock you alot but you're a good guy (Stange as hell though).
Hoff Posted February 5, 2004 Report Posted February 5, 2004 You. I think that the Masturbating Bear (and how hard is it to spell "masturbating?" Christ, I'm sure we all do it enough) should at the very least be made an honorary mod.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now