Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
EVIL~! alkeiper

Yet Another Fantasy League Thread

Recommended Posts

I don't know how many ABs Myers is going to get this year. The Jays want to develop Kevin Cash as the catcher of the future so I think he'll get more playing time behind the plate and they probably don't want to take Phelps out of the line-up too often (if he plays well) to put Myers at DH.

 

Keep an eye on Guillermo Quiroz. He hit 282/372/518 at Double A New Haven last season, at the age of 21. He should put in a year at AAA this season, and make the majors by 2005.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Traber is out for the season then I need to make a trade for a starting pitcher! Somebody send me some offers for a SP. Damn and its my luck that I drafted 2 starting pitchers who will be on the injury list when the season starts. Damn Yahoo news & notes BS, it said Traber signed a 1 year deal but forgot to mention that he is recovering from TOMMY JOHN SURGERY!

 

:firedevil:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meh. My team seems mediocre. I like my first two starters, and I have a reliable closer, but speed is going to be a concern. Which is odd, because I've finished first in steals all four years I've been in my money league.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if we have pitchers that were injured/didn't pitch much last year?

 

My 2003 total came out to 1168 IP however Ainsworth only pitched 68.1 IP when he could hopefully pitch at least 150 IP this season. Assuming everybody stayed the same and Ainsworth pitched, say the 150 innings, that bumps my team total up to 1249.9 IP which would be pretty damn close to exceeding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both the public yahoo leagues and ALkeiper leagues use 7 pitchers but the AL league required 5 SP and the public has the 3 P which is flexable to choose between SP or RP. The average SP innings pitched is about 100, so why not increase the max number of innings pitched to around 1350?

 

It would be fair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if you come close, you cut back on the innings you use your pitchers. The basic premise of the limit is to keep you from cycling your bench players in every time one has a start up. If your 6 pitchers average 180 innings, and your closer/reliever gives you 80, that's 1160. Certainly plenty of room to spare. In order to reach 1400 innings, you'd have to use all seven pitching spots for 200 IP apiece. That seems excessive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Both the public yahoo leagues and ALkeiper leagues use 7 pitchers but the AL league required 5 SP and the public has the 3 P which is flexable to choose between SP or RP. The average SP innings pitched is about 100, so why not increase the max number of innings pitched to around 1350?

 

It would be fair.

Excuse me?

 

Do you mean MY league? Or Tom's?

 

If you mean mine, mine's only got 2 P.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Both the public yahoo leagues and ALkeiper leagues use 7 pitchers but the AL league required 5 SP and the public has the 3 P which is flexable to choose between SP or RP.  The average SP innings pitched is about 100, so why not increase the max number of innings pitched to around 1350?

 

It would be fair.

Bolded and stuff for emphasis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Both the public yahoo leagues and ALkeiper leagues use 7 pitchers but the AL league required 5 SP and the public has the 3 P which is flexable to choose between SP or RP.   The average SP innings pitched is about 100, so why not increase the max number of innings pitched to around 1350?

 

It would be fair.

Bolded and stuff for emphasis.

Eh?

 

...I asked about a third P. I did NOT give one. I was told no to the subject, so I left it as is.

 

I've only got TWO right now.

 

Bolded, italiced, and underlined for emphazing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Smell the ratings!!!

the point is you aren't supposed to use all your pitcher's innings.

 

it's like how you can only get 162 games at each batting position. Counting your bench players, you would probably be able to get more than that, but since it's roto, you aren't supposed to cycle guys in and out like you would in a head to head league.

 

or something. I'm sleepy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a question for the roto leagues. I was trying to compare Public Yahoo with the Private TSM leagues in hopes to get extra innings but ALkeiper said no.

 

And anybody wanna make a trade? How about Sandy Jr for Coco Crisp?

 

the point is you aren't supposed to use all your pitcher's innings.

 

it's like how you can only get 162 games at each batting position. Counting your bench players, you would probably be able to get more than that, but since it's roto, you aren't supposed to cycle guys in and out like you would in a head to head league.

 

or something. I'm sleepy.

This is true as in the roto basketball league there is a 82 game limit and I already over and average of +14 per position at this point. This would be similiar to making a max limit of minutes played during a season. I think extra innings for the league of AL only, would be acceptable since it requires 5 starters. While the public league only requires 2 starters with 3 utility pitchers if you will. So in the public league a manager could rotate some RPs in the utility position to keep the inninings pitched low. But AL league re-aligned the pitchers to have only 2 RP so it limits the practice of loading up on BENCH pitchers to the rotation and going over the limit of innings pitched.

 

I WANNA USE A PITCHER FOR EVERY INNING IN A GAME!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It was a question for the roto leagues. I was trying to compare Public Yahoo with the Private TSM leagues in hopes to get extra innings but ALkeiper said no.

 

I haven't said no. I just need a convincing argument.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see no reason to change it. Looking at this in the whole "real team" concept, 1250 IP makes sense. Look at the Cubs staff from last year, the starting pitchers and the top two relievers combined for 1168.2 IP and they had four 200 IP.

 

I seriously doubt anyone in this league will have 4 pitchers who go to 200 IP considering there were only 22 in the AL who did it last year. But even if you have a staff on par with the Cubs you still have 80 IP to add in an extra reliever who ride an extra starter on a month long hot streak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok everyone. I have a proposal. Instead of having 5 SP, 1 RP, and 1 P, how about just having 7 P? This would allow people a little flexability, and avoid having teams destroyed simply due to lack of starters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Smell the ratings!!!

well we could do that, but starters totally own relivers in fantasy. There ERA and WHIP carry more weight, and they get more K's and wins. what I mean is I think if someone uses 3 or 4 starters instead of 5, they would have no chance of winning.

 

but I'm not against the change if that's what you're asking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's doable as well.

 

Here's what I'm going to do. I'm throwing this out towards the teams in the league. Vote on the rules you want. Tomorrow evening, I'll review the responses and make decisions.

 

Do you want......

5 SP, 1 RP, 1 P

4 SP, 3 P

7 P

 

Do you want......

1250 IP

1300 IP

1400 IP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to suggest that any changes to be made should only be made in the NL ONLY league since it has not drafted yet. Remember it is a 16 team league which is the LARGEST and it will be a tougher draft since there are more managers involved.

 

I fear that I will have to start Ray King in my pitching rotation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×