St. Gabe 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 What does WHOOSH Mean? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Coming up momentarily........ Hannity vs. Garaffalo........ Oh, Christ. What a horrible segment of radio. Hannity wouldn't shut his mouth. I was curious to hear what JG was going to say but Hannity talked for like 80% of the time. There was one "question" Sean asked that went like 5 minutes and he had to say several times throughout that he was asking a question! So, anyone think Gabe is a PBP or just new? And, Gabe, if you think this thread is mean to Mikey, you ought to use the "search" function here and look at some older Mikey Moore threads. I'm the pointman when it comes to Mikey fat jokes around these parts. -= kkk, who is still amazed at how it's not cool to rip on fatties in 2004, when only a few years ago it was a regular insult that was hurled at Limbaugh... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
St. Gabe 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Seriously though, can someone tell me what WHOOSH actually means. BTW, not a PBP...used to linger when it was allowed, fnally registered when it was forced. Bye =Gabe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tommytomlin 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 It's the sound something makes when it goes over someone's head. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 BTW, not a PBP...used to linger when it was allowed, fnally registered when it was forced. Well, if you are indeed a newbie (I'm smelling PRINCE PAUL), here's some advice: If you can, take some time to review previous threads regarding topics you are most likely to comment on. That way you can have some backstory to the intelligent discussions that are sure to be forthcoming... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thebigjig Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Nah, just virulently anti-fat tubby sacks of shit. -=Mike Yet I'm willing to bet that you're a fan of Limbaugh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thebigjig Report post Posted July 29, 2004 The UN failing to do their jobs kind of did it as well. Saddam was a prick... no one will argue that, but when the Weapons Inspectors were allowed back in BEFORE the invasion... they found nothing. It's going to become more and more obvious that containment was working... Saddam had about as much capability in attacking us as France has And which ones said that there was no Al Qaeda presence in Iraq? Oh oh oh okay... so now it's "presence" ? Good argument... because when the Commission states that "Iraq had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks of 9/11" which is something the Bush Administration has tried to push on us from the beginning, then we revert back to.... "well there was a PRESENCE"! Well guess what, there's a "presence" in most of the middle east, as well as parts of Europe... so lets invade 'em all! France has shown quite well they couldn't attack a fly with no wings much less a country with military power. Well once again, I was using sarcasm, but the point was that I could use your argument with practically any country So what exactly SHOULD the end result be in Afghanistan? Nuke? How else do you deal with people (the term really doesn't apply here) with no regard for their or anyone else's lives? Wanna play Gen. MacArthur or Patton here? Here's your chance. The end result should've been dedicating the resources that we've dedicated to a country that we kind of sort of but not really maybe thought had something to do with 9/11... and though everyone else says we're wrong, we're right damnit because we're the US of A! And we're always right! Sidenote: Patton is probably rolling in his grave right now at how this operation has been carried out from a military strategic standpoint Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Patton is probably rolling in his grave right now at how this operation has been carried out from a military strategic standpoint I agree with you on this one. With all the B.S. Red-Tape that is hindering our troops now, I'm sure Patton would rather remain dead than deal with this. Yet I'm willing to bet that you're a fan of Limbaugh I'm not sure what I find more annoying -- correcting people regarding Limbaugh's weight or telling people that Rush faced a backlash from many of fans for his Chelsea/Dog picture years ago... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Nah, just virulently anti-fat tubby sacks of shit. -=Mike Yet I'm willing to bet that you're a fan of Limbaugh Rush ain't fat. Hasn't been in more than a few years, actually. But, it is nice to see that it's fair game for you to rip on him about that. I find it substantially offensive that you discriminate against the physically disabled portion of our country's population, which you call "fat tubby sacks of shit". All fat people aren't fat, tubby sacks of shit. Mikey Moore is in a special class. VERY "special". because a person is considered obese does not result in them being a vile and terrible human being. Nah, him being an obscenely obese person is just ANOTHER strike against him. It's the least of his problems, honestly. Your post is not taking a shot at Michael Moore it is taking a shot at all overweight Americans. I believe you owe the corpulent community of America an apology. Don't hold your breath or have a heart attack waiting for it. Saddam was a prick... no one will argue that, but when the Weapons Inspectors were allowed back in BEFORE the invasion... they found nothing. It's going to become more and more obvious that containment was working... Saddam had about as much capability in attacking us as France has That's only because France was also arming him. Saddam was stalling and setting up roadblocks to the inspectors constantly. As an administration official stated, it was HIS job to prove he disarmed, not ours to prove he hasn't. If he was unwilling to prove it --- which he was --- then the ceasefire was null and void. Oh oh oh okay... so now it's "presence" ? Good argument... because when the Commission states that "Iraq had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks of 9/11" which is something the Bush Administration has tried to push on us from the beginning, then we revert back to.... "well there was a PRESENCE"! Well guess what, there's a "presence" in most of the middle east, as well as parts of Europe... so lets invade 'em all! There are links between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Have been links for years. Bush never said Iraq had a hand in 9/11. This is the whole "War on Terror" in its glory. If you're a terrorist group, sponsor terrorism, or fund terrorism --- you're in the crosshairs. The end result should've been dedicating the resources that we've dedicated to a country that we kind of sort of but not really maybe thought had something to do with 9/11... and though everyone else says we're wrong, we're right damnit because we're the US of A! And we're always right! HINT: We're still there. Very much in Afghanistan. Sidenote: Patton is probably rolling in his grave right now at how this operation has been carried out from a military strategic standpoint Nah, he started spinning after seeing how much of a putz George C. Scott was and hasn't stopped yet. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slayer 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 BTW, not a PBP...used to linger when it was allowed, fnally registered when it was forced. Well, if you are indeed a newbie (I'm smelling PRINCE PAUL), here's some advice: If you can, take some time to review previous threads regarding topics you are most likely to comment on. That way you can have some backstory to the intelligent discussions that are sure to be forthcoming... Here's some other advice KKK means every word in every post he makes Beware Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 HINT: We're still there. Very much in Afghanistan. Please, we're still in Bosnia... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vyce 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Sidenote: Patton is probably rolling in his grave right now at how this operation has been carried out from a military strategic standpoint You're right - he'd be pissed we've only lost under a thousand soldiers. He had much higher body counts for the units under his control. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Special K 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Um, I think Don Vito's being a gimmick poster. Maybe not. I just haven't heard the word 'corpulent' in many a year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thebigjig Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Rush ain't fat. Hasn't been in more than a few years, actually. But, it is nice to see that it's fair game for you to rip on him about that. Ah yes but he WAS a fat sack of shit a few years ago, and I'd be willing to bet that didnt bother you. Oh and I guess its only okay to make fun of someones weight if you're a conservative As an administration official stated, it was HIS job to prove he disarmed, not ours to prove he hasn't. If he was unwilling to prove it --- which he was --- then the ceasefire was null and void. Only to find out that he was right all along... thats depressing There are links between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Have been links for years. Bush never said Iraq had a hand in 9/11. This is the whole "War on Terror" in its glory. If you're a terrorist group, sponsor terrorism, or fund terrorism --- you're in the crosshairs. Oh please... there are links between Al Qaeda and practically every middle eastern country that hates us or has hated us in the past... Bush wanted to go into Iraq from day one and this just gave him a convenient excuse. When are we going to invade Saudia Arabia? HINT: We're still there. Very much in Afghanistan. HINT: The majority of our military might is in Iraq I know we're still in Afghanistan genius, but it's not our #1 priority Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vyce 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Um, I think Don Vito's being a gimmick poster. Maybe not. I just haven't heard the word 'corpulent' in many a year. Of course he's a gimmick poster. Hasn't anyone ever seen Bam Margera's show on MTV? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest DonVito Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Um, I think Don Vito's being a gimmick poster. Maybe not. I just haven't heard the word 'corpulent' in many a year. Of course he's a gimmick poster. Hasn't anyone ever seen Bam Margera's show on MTV? I am not a gimmick poster. I may have an avatar with his picture and a log in name called DonVito but that does not qualify as a gimmick poster. There are plenty other posters with names of famous people or well-known wrestlers on this board. I am an obese American like Don Vito and he is an inspiration to me. Please do not offend me by accusing me of being a gimmick poster when I clearly am not. -=Vito Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest SP-1 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 To be fair, I'm not sure invading a country run by a fairly insane dictator with NUKES at his disposal would prove wise. I understand what you're saying there, jig, and we should do something to stop North Korea, but invading a la Iraq might not be the best thing. If Bush was willing to storm Iraq and bomb the place to hell, even when he was under the assumption that they had WMD, how would North Korea be any different? Oh yeah, we actually know that North Korea has nuclear weapons that they could use, and they are a tad bit closer to US soil. Speaking of WMD, Im convinced that the intelligence could have suggested that there was a 1 in a million chance of Iraq having WMD and Bush's response, a la Lloyd from Dumb and Dumber would have been "So you're telling me theres a chance!" The difference is that we suspected chemical/biological weapons. Which are terrible and could indeed cause mass destruction. But a few nukes could wipe DC off the map. Or South Korea. A nuke could probably wipe out the biggest military installation we'd have near N. Korea. Biological weapons are pretty high up there, but Nukes are a beast all their own. They don't take their time and aren't very avoidable. They hit and incinerate. Plus, if Saddam had weapons, there was at least a political chance he wouldn't use them. I have no doubt that the leader of North Korea is nuts enough to hit the big red button if he feels very threatened. I might be wrong in that and I hope I would be, but he just doesn't strike me as a very sane individual that understands the power of what he has. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Special K 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 I've always been a proponent on the Star Wars project. Any news on how that's going? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vyce 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 I've always been a proponent on the Star Wars project. Any news on how that's going? The Death Star construction is behind schedule, thanks to those New Rebellion bastards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 I guess its only okay to make fun of someones weight if you're a conservative Al Franken didn't seem to have that problem, which I find funny because Al is to Ugly what Rush was to fat... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thebigjig Report post Posted July 29, 2004 I guess its only okay to make fun of someones weight if you're a conservative Al Franken didn't seem to have that problem, which I find funny because Al is to Ugly what Rush was to fat... Al Franken is rather attractive for a buck toothed jewish guy but either way, I was just pointing at how its okay to call Moore fat, but if you mention how fat Rush was at one time, you're going for the low blow Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted July 29, 2004 I guess its only okay to make fun of someones weight if you're a conservative Al Franken didn't seem to have that problem, which I find funny because Al is to Ugly what Rush was to fat... Al Franken is rather attractive for a buck toothed jewish guy but either way, I was just pointing at how its okay to call Moore fat, but if you mention how fat Rush was at one time, you're going for the low blow Who said it was a low blow? Who whines when Rush is called fat? I simply pointed out that if you wish to insult the man, you should try and be factually accurate as to the insults. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Al Franken is rather attractive for a buck toothed jewish guy True dat. I was just pointing at how its okay to call Moore fat, but if you mention how fat Rush was at one time, you're going for the low blow Who said you're going for a low blow regarding Rush's weight? I didn't even know you when Rush was portly. I never said that was a "low blow" to anyone. If I had, that would mean I'm taking what that person says seriously. Go ahead w/ the fat jokes. Nobody's stopping you. Back in '95 Rush was a member of the GOP -- GRAND OLD PIGGY. LOL2004! Back in '88 he called himself "Rush" because he was in a "rush" to the front of the buffet. LOL2005! Back in '94 he was dubbed the "Majority Maker" because whenever he entered a room he took up most of the space. LOL2006! Happy now?... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Who said it was a low blow? Who whines when Rush is called fat? You know. THEM or THOSE PEOPLE... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest M. Harry Smilac Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Yea Bush got false information and went to war over it. Anyone who belives that has their head so far up their ass it's unbelieveable. Bush went to war so his BUTT buddy companies could profit from it.Simple as that.All about the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Rush isn't fat anymore?Must be the oxycotin! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thebigjig Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Yea Bush got false information and went to war over it. Anyone who belives that has their head so far up their ass it's unbelieveable. Bush went to war so his BUTT buddy companies could profit from it.Simple as that.All about the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Wow... I had those suspicions myself, but now you've convinced me!! word of advice pal, you'll go nowhere in this folder unless you can make a better argument Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thebigjig Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Happy now?... No, but its a start And Rush may not be fat anymore, but I bet he's got a LOT of loose skin... and that counts for something right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest SP-1 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Yea Bush got false information and went to war over it. Anyone who belives that has their head so far up their ass it's unbelieveable. Bush went to war so his BUTT buddy companies could profit from it.Simple as that.All about the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Rush isn't fat anymore?Must be the oxycotin! Michael Moore? Man, you've got some fans here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Yea Bush got false information and went to war over it. Anyone who belives that has their head so far up their ass it's unbelieveable. Bush went to war so his BUTT buddy companies could profit from it.Simple as that.All about the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Rush isn't fat anymore?Must be the oxycotin! I think trying to sell me on Jadakiss' 'meaningful' lyrics over in that thread in music was more convincing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Just go read PNAC which is signed by Rumsfield, Cheney and many others that specifically say they wanted to go in and invade Iraq,(note the letter is from 1998) however it would be necessary for a modern day pearl harbor to be able to sway the public support for such a thing......Also note there is little to nothing concerning Al Qaeda in their letters of concern until recently. It seems pretty obvious there was a concious effort to go into Iraq before even Bush went into office, and they were just biding their time until they got another republican in office. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites