Highland 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 (edited) Statement: WWE needs to quit going to the Rock and other stars from the past to promote their present and future stars. Edited August 23, 2004 by Highland Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spman 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: WWE needs to quite going to the Rock and other stars from the past to promote their present and future stars. Rebutal: Totally false. The Rock is easily one of the most charismatic and entertaining workers ever. He always pops a high rating, and his sporadic appearences on RAW are always the highlight of every show. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: Abdullah the Butcher should do at least one stint in the WWE Before he DIES! Dag nabbit that Walking 70 year old Planetoid has been in every other wrestling promotion since 1950. You'd think he'd take some time out from Impaling people with Forks in Japan or serving up that goood Chinese and Ribs in Atlanta to come north just so Randy Orton could spit on him or Do a Waddle in and attack the Undertaker or something... Abby in WWE= RATINGS!...................well Im sure somewhere... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Highland 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: WWE needs to quite going to the Rock and other stars from the past to promote their present and future stars. Rebutal: Totally false. The Rock is easily one of the most charismatic and entertaining workers ever. He always pops a high rating, and his sporadic appearences on RAW are always the highlight of every show. Counter rebuttal: Wrong. No matter how popular the Rock is, he is retired and constantly relying on him for the cheap pop makes it that much harder to put over future stars. They shouldn't have to use the Rock, Hogan, Foley or whoever to put people over today. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: "You Can't See Me" is the worst catchphrase currently being used regularly in the company. Â Statement: Eddie vs. Kurt may be the weakest* feud of 2004. Â Â *Notice I didn't say "worst" or "bad" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChick 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: "You Can't See Me" is the worst catchphrase currently being used regularly in the company  Nope, because it's pretty popular. For something to be the worst, it has to be bad and unover. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spman 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: WWE needs to quite going to the Rock and other stars from the past to promote their present and future stars. Rebutal: Totally false. The Rock is easily one of the most charismatic and entertaining workers ever. He always pops a high rating, and his sporadic appearences on RAW are always the highlight of every show. Counter rebuttal: Wrong. No matter how popular the Rock is, he is retired and constantly relying on him for the cheap pop makes it that much harder to put over future stars. They shouldn't have to use the Rock, Hogan, Foley or whoever to put people over today. Counter to your counter: The pop the Rock gets is far from Cheap. The crowd genuinely loves him, and all the heat he draws is from his outstanding work on the mic. Even though they never capitalized on it, The Rock single handedly took The Hurricane from being a bottom of the card comedy gimmick to a potential main event player. A majority of Eugene's popularity can also be attibuted to that one segment with The Rock as well. I'll agree with Foley and others being used for cheap pops, but The Rock is no where's near that territory. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: "You Can't See Me" is the worst catchphrase currently being used regularly in the company  Nope, because it's pretty popular. For something to be the worst, it has to be bad and unover. No, it just has to be a the worst catchphrase in the company.  By your logic, "What?" is the best ever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChick 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: "You Can't See Me" is the worst catchphrase currently being used regularly in the company  Nope, because it's pretty popular. For something to be the worst, it has to be bad and unover. No, it just has to be a the worst catchphrase in the company.  By your logic, "What?" is the best ever. Hey, I didn't say it was the best, but it being popular saves it from being the worst. Something like "CBL" would be the worse because it was bad and never caught on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Mandarin 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: "As punishment, you're gonna face ... Kane!" is getting VERY tired and it's due to uncreative writing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spman 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: "As punishment, you're gonna face ... Kane!" is getting VERY tired and it's due to uncreative writing. Rebuttal: Agree 100%. It's time fo move on to "As punishment, I'm going to tie you up and force you to watch Kane fight Test in an Ultimate Submission Iron Man match" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: "As punishment, you're gonna face ... Kane!" is getting VERY tired and it's due to uncreative writing. Rubuttal: Unfortunately they so totally screwed tattooed and served kane up with a apple in his mouth so many times with how his character is, Maven could probably sneak out a victory on Kane 2K4 where as Kane 98 he would have be destroyed and set on fire by a Lightning bolt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: "You Can't See Me" is the worst catchphrase currently being used regularly in the company  Nope, because it's pretty popular. For something to be the worst, it has to be bad and unover. No, it just has to be a the worst catchphrase in the company.  By your logic, "What?" is the best ever. Hey, I didn't say it was the best, but it being popular saves it from being the worst. Something like "CBL" would be the worse because it was bad and never caught on. It's not being currently used. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Rrrsh Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: "You Can't See Me" is the worst catchphrase currently being used regularly in the company  Nope, because it's pretty popular. For something to be the worst, it has to be bad and unover. Yah, like Booker T's "Dont hate the player, hate the game" crap in WCW. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Rrrsh Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: "You Can't See Me" is the worst catchphrase currently being used regularly in the company  Nope, because it's pretty popular. For something to be the worst, it has to be bad and unover. No, it just has to be a the worst catchphrase in the company.  By your logic, "What?" is the best ever. Hey, I didn't say it was the best, but it being popular saves it from being the worst. Something like "CBL" would be the worse because it was bad and never caught on. It's not being currently used. CBL was being used by Ross untill he got hurt, so I say its current. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: "You Can't See Me" is the worst catchphrase currently being used regularly in the company  Nope, because it's pretty popular. For something to be the worst, it has to be bad and unover. No, it just has to be a the worst catchphrase in the company.  By your logic, "What?" is the best ever. Hey, I didn't say it was the best, but it being popular saves it from being the worst. Something like "CBL" would be the worse because it was bad and never caught on. It's not being currently used. CBL was being used by Ross untill he got hurt, so I say its current. actually its CLB  Creepy Little Bastard Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Rrrsh Report post Posted August 23, 2004 My Point remains grammer boy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mecha Mummy 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: "You Can't See Me" is the worst catchphrase currently being used regularly in the company  Nope, because it's pretty popular. For something to be the worst, it has to be bad and unover. No, it just has to be a the worst catchphrase in the company.  By your logic, "What?" is the best ever. Hey, I didn't say it was the best, but it being popular saves it from being the worst. Something like "CBL" would be the worse because it was bad and never caught on. It's not being currently used. Well, that probably has something to do with Christian being injured, no? When he comes back the stupid CLB name will probably come back too. I'd say it's current enough to count. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 My Point remains grammer boy. thats spelling not grammar... Â silly over sensative on being corrected all friendly like boy.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 STATEMENT: Although seeing him as a #1 babyface would have all made us sick, business-wise, it made more sense for Triple H to be jumped out of Evolution and gone on the monster face rampage, while Orton continued to refine and improve on the "cool heel" gimmick he has just STARTED to develop Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord of The Curry 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Hey kids, stop getting off topic in my thread. It's a statement or a rebuttal. That's the point of the layout and title. Â To start us back up....... Â The most potentially botched "Guaranteed Money Match" was when the WWE put Stone Cold Steve Austin and Hulk Hogan in the ring with ZERO hype in a 2 on 3 match feat. Austin and Rock vs NWO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord of The Curry 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 STATEMENT: Although seeing him as a #1 babyface would have all made us sick, business-wise, it made more sense for Triple H to be jumped out of Evolution and gone on the monster face rampage, while Orton continued to refine and improve on the "cool heel" gimmick he has just STARTED to develop Rebuttal: I'm not feelin' it. HHH as a face would be death to the program as he's proven his worth at getting himself over at guys expense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted August 23, 2004 STATEMENT: Although seeing him as a #1 babyface would have all made us sick, business-wise, it made more sense for Triple H to be jumped out of Evolution and gone on the monster face rampage, while Orton continued to refine and improve on the "cool heel" gimmick he has just STARTED to develop Rebuttal: Nope, HHH is as good a face as Angle. So no fly.............. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted August 23, 2004 The most potentially botched "Guaranteed Money Match" was when the WWE put Stone Cold Steve Austin and Hulk Hogan in the ring with ZERO hype in a 2 on 3 match feat. Austin and Rock vs NWO. Rebuttal: It depends on if you want to consider the original plan to do Austin vs. Lesnar in a Raw ME with half an hour of build before Austin walked out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord of The Curry 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 You're seriously comparing Austin vs Lesnar to Austin vs Hogan? Â .................. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Brian Report post Posted August 23, 2004 On the HHH face run: Â Statement: A Triple H face run after the Austin turn would have been the best thing for business at the time, both monetarily and in terms of wrestling, and both men would have benefitted greatly from a program. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Highland 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: If and when HHH becomes the real promoter of WWE we will see a return to the old school style of wrestling and less fluff pieces. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Australian Pride 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: London/Kidman will become VERY over as a tag team, and then let us down when they have the inevitable feud. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Brian Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Kidman's always there to let people down. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
El Psycho Diablo 0 Report post Posted August 23, 2004 Statement: Kidman's a one-move guy who isn't even the best in the company at preforming his "signature move". His skills aren't up to the rest of the division, and always seems to tag with someone more talented than he is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
