The Czech Republic Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Edwards, talkin bout them big ol' fat cats by their smimmin pools, boooooooo!
AndrewTS Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Dividends are doubly-taxed anyway, right?
Guest MikeSC Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Jesus, Cheney is owning him in domestic policy as well. This is a borderline epic bitch-slapping. -=Mike Christ, Mike, what the hell are you watching? Seriously now. What in the hell are you watching? Edwards has been rocking Cheney in the domestic policy debate so well. You are completely blind to reality. Edwards is simply the guy who can't go BEYOND talking points and is petrified to do so. And if he REALLY wants to attack capital gains tax cuts, he'll only be attacking, you know, EVERYBODY WITH A RETIREMENT PLAN. -=Mike
snuffbox Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Jesus, Cheney is owning him in domestic policy as well. This is a borderline epic bitch-slapping. -=Mike Christ, Mike, what the hell are you watching? Seriously now. What in the hell are you watching? Edwards has been rocking Cheney in the domestic policy debate so well. Dont take Mikes opinion too seriously...hes only going to see a total Republican victory. Hes not the one to ask for objectivity...
Guest GreatOne Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 OK how many times is Edwards gonna do the 'fundamental difference between them and us' thing?
The Czech Republic Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 I feel a shade of passive-aggression in the "Cheney has a gay faughter and that's just fine" statement.
Guest MikeSC Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Jesus, Cheney is owning him in domestic policy as well. This is a borderline epic bitch-slapping. -=Mike Christ, Mike, what the hell are you watching? Seriously now. What in the hell are you watching? Edwards has been rocking Cheney in the domestic policy debate so well. Dont take Mikes opinion too seriously...hes only going to see a total Republican victory. Hes not the one to ask for objectivity... I had no problem saying Bush looked bad on Thursday. Today, this is a royal ass-kicking. -=Mike
RavishingRickRudo Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Mike you don't get it, do you? I like Debates, your political concerns really are a secondary issue for me.
Guest GreatOne Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Jesus, Cheney is owning him in domestic policy as well. This is a borderline epic bitch-slapping. -=Mike Christ, Mike, what the hell are you watching? Seriously now. What in the hell are you watching? Edwards has been rocking Cheney in the domestic policy debate so well. Dont take Mikes opinion too seriously...hes only going to see a total Republican victory. Hes not the one to ask for objectivity... Or you..............
The Czech Republic Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Dividends are doubly-taxed anyway, right? That they are. Even death is taxed here.
snuffbox Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 OK how many times is Edwards gonna do the 'fundamental difference between them and us' thing? Showing that difference is the inherant idea behind the concept of debate...
teke184 Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Edwards just screwed up... IIRC, in the 1960s the Supreme Court DID rule that states have to accept interracial marriages from another state.
Guest GreatOne Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Gay daughter!! Whether Jr does anything with it is up to him
Ted the Poster Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Notice he said "Heaven forbid" instead of, well...
The Czech Republic Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 I tohught he was from South Carolina
Guest GreatOne Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 OK how many times is Edwards gonna do the 'fundamental difference between them and us' thing? Showing that difference is the inherant idea behind the concept of debate... Yet Bush repeating points ad nauseum is OMGDUMBFUCK2004!~....................
Guest MikeSC Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Wow, Edwards completely inventing the "difficulties" in doing such things as getting their "equal rights". He's a lawyer --- he should know better. Unless he's a shitty lawyer. -=Mike ...And he's 100% incorrect once again --- he, apparently, missed the whole "Full Faith and Credit Clause"...
AndrewTS Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Edwards just screwed up... IIRC, in the 1960s the Supreme Court DID rule that states have to accept interracial marriages from another state. ...and he keeps hammering it.
Guest Cerebus Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 According to Edwards, if I move to Virginia or Maryland (or, hopefully, to Hawaii) I'll have to get married again?
Guest MikeSC Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Edwards just screwed up... IIRC, in the 1960s the Supreme Court DID rule that states have to accept interracial marriages from another state. ...and he keeps hammering it. That only makes it worse. -=Mike
iliketurtles Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 What did Cheney just say about his daughter? I missed it.
RavishingRickRudo Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Cheneys response about his daughter was class. Awesome stuff. Edwards' explanation was pretty good, but I thought it was a democrat strong point and it didn't seem like it.
DMann2003 Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 That's a good point regarding state's not being required to recognize/not recognize a marriage (straight or gay) Good showing of thanks by Cheney there Now we're getting to the malpractice issue
Ted the Poster Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Czech- he was born in SC and raised here in NC... I think.
Guest MikeSC Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 According to Edwards, if I move to Virginia or Maryland (or, hopefully, to Hawaii) I'll have to get married again? Yes. And you'll LIKE it! Oh! Cheney got owned on that topic. Provided you ignore that Edwards couldn't have been more incorrect on it than he was. -=Mike
Downhome Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 I tohught he was from South Carolina He is, Seneca, SC to be exact.
snuffbox Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Cheney isnt attacking as viciously as some thought on this trial-lawyer thing.. good idea, imo.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now