Rob E Dangerously Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 this is more of an idea of mine. But currently China and Tonga have the same say on the General Assembly. So I worked on an idea for a House of Representatives-esque chamber. But one problem is that it'd be massive. So maybe this works. http://www.geocities.com/bigredrbh/un.htm 925 seats country population divided by 5 million. But with a cap of 47 (to stop China or India from dominating, under the formula, if there was no cap, then China would have 259 seats) There's 191 countries in the UN. Taiwan and the Vatican are not members. Palestine isn't either, but for the purpose of having an odd number of members, they're included. But you can overlook that. # of reps: 1 - 100 countries 2 - 26 countries 3 - 12 countries 4 - 7 countries 5 - 7 countries and so on.. it is a bit skewed though. It could use some work or weighting. then again, it also gives Bangladesh a lot of seats too So, which group or country would strike down this idea first?
Guest Salacious Crumb Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 The French since they'd be against anything that would further dwindle what little power they actually have.
tommytomlin Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 I am so glad Australia has less seats than Tanzania and Nepal.
Dr. Tom Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 The French since they'd be against anything that would further dwindle what little power they actually have. Fuck them. When they actually do something useful, I might listen to them.
Highland Posted October 7, 2004 Report Posted October 7, 2004 This could be a good thing, then again giving even greater powers to highly populated Third World dictatorships probably isn't.
Styles Posted October 7, 2004 Report Posted October 7, 2004 How about we just let the UN relocate to Paris, and let them fuck up things on their own?
Highland Posted October 7, 2004 Report Posted October 7, 2004 This UN isn't that bad that it should be punished by being relocated to Paris, is it?
Guest MikeSC Posted October 7, 2004 Report Posted October 7, 2004 How about we just let the UN relocate to Paris, and let them fuck up things on their own? Just think: Twice the chambers, TWICE THE CORRUPTION! -=Mike
kkktookmybabyaway Posted October 7, 2004 Report Posted October 7, 2004 The U.N. does such a great job, let's make it BIGGER. I'm concerned that when U.N. Peacekeepers run away from a rabid chipmunk that if there's more of them a stampede will occur and they'll trample over the people they're supposed to protect...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now