reign 0 Report post Posted January 17, 2005 On WOL, Meltzer said they should have had MNM debut (Joey Matthews, Johnny Nitro, Melina) and win the tag titles to get them off to a hot start. Oh well. what is a MNM? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HollywoodSpikeJenkins 0 Report post Posted January 17, 2005 On WOL, Meltzer said they should have had MNM debut (Joey Matthews, Johnny Nitro, Melina) and win the tag titles to get them off to a hot start. Oh well. what is a MNM? A really over stable/tag team in OVW. I met Joey Matthews last month (and again next Saturday) and he is a really cool, down to earth guy. I'm all for him getting a push. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisMWaters 0 Report post Posted January 17, 2005 On WOL, Meltzer said they should have had MNM debut (Joey Matthews, Johnny Nitro, Melina) and win the tag titles to get them off to a hot start. Oh well. what is a MNM? A really over stable/tag team in OVW. I met Joey Matthews last month (and again next Saturday) and he is a really cool, down to earth guy. I'm all for him getting a push. What's MNM stand for...or is it like DDT and doesn't have a meaning for the letters? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Precious Roy 0 Report post Posted January 17, 2005 On WOL, Meltzer said they should have had MNM debut (Joey Matthews, Johnny Nitro, Melina) and win the tag titles to get them off to a hot start. Oh well. what is a MNM? A really over stable/tag team in OVW. I met Joey Matthews last month (and again next Saturday) and he is a really cool, down to earth guy. I'm all for him getting a push. What's MNM stand for...or is it like DDT and doesn't have a meaning for the letters? MatthewsNitroMelina Instead of doing a title change, they should just hand over half of the tag titles to someone. There's precedent for that being done, so yeah, there's no reason not to. It was done with Austin/HBK and the Hollywood Blondes off the top of my head, and I know there's other cases as well. Please explain why putting COACH in the match makes more sense?!? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest FromBeyondTheGrave Report post Posted January 17, 2005 Because Coach is the leader of the playa's club, the master of your mothers, the daddy of your daughters, the voice of Raw and Heat, and of course, he rules, baby. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JJMc 0 Report post Posted January 17, 2005 Ugh... La Resistance Tag Champs AGAIN!? Just give them to Tyson & Xtian. If they had, it'd been the third title Christian won at a house show (the Euro from Bradshaw and the IC from Booker). Christian won the Euro belt at a Smackdown taping but the show ran long so it was cut. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
King Cucaracha 0 Report post Posted January 17, 2005 I'm confused. Wasn't Hassan vs. Hurricane on Raw a Royal Rumble Qualifying Match? I could have SWORN Lillian announced it as one at least. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Loss Report post Posted January 17, 2005 I would bet the farm that La Res only got the titles so they could job them to Benoit and Jericho at some point in the near future. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Coffey Report post Posted January 17, 2005 I'm still a "mark" for La Résistance, so this doesn't bother me. Even though Sylvan Grenier sucks, Rob Conway can carry the load so that I still enjoy watching them. It's not like WWE has a lot of actual tag teams left. Actually, I am a little irked that they did it on a house show. Not just because it was on a house show, but because I won't be able to see it. You just know that on Raw, JR will just say something like "they won the titles over the weekend" and that will be the end of it. It sucks that Eugene got hurt. Regal looked genuinely happy when they won the titles. It looked like a big deal to him. I was happy for him. Now this happens. I doubt we'll see too much of Regal now, which sucks because he's damn entertaining. As far as the Royal Rumble qualifying shit goes, I don't really know what to think anymore. I mean, at one time, I thought that WWE wouldn't have enough qualifying matches so that they meant anything. If they keep it up, however, they just might. Each show gets an odd number of entrants (fifteen) so doing one-on-one matches isn't going to come out even. So, that probably means that number one and number thirty will be given away again. Still, each show has to have fourteen qualifying matches to fill out their side of the Rumble. I'm still not too confident that they'll do that, but they're getting closer. Especially if they're running the shit on "B" shows as well. At least the Royal Rumble always piques my interest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperJerk 0 Report post Posted January 17, 2005 Ugh... La Resistance Tag Champs AGAIN!? Just give them to Tyson & Xtian. If they had, it'd been the third title Christian won at a house show (the Euro from Bradshaw and the IC from Booker). Christian won the Euro belt at a Smackdown taping but the show ran long so it was cut. Still, the guy's got a really strong record of non-televised title wins. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
natey2k4 0 Report post Posted January 17, 2005 then La Res hit their tag finisher (sorry, forget the name) The Au Revoir wouldn't it be "L' Au Revoir" then lol? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
