Hoff Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Mike...did you just misspell your own name?!
Guest MikeSC Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 'Twas. Good. Hate to think I lost my Transformers knowledge. -=Mike ...Never see any Go Bots references here, though...
Hoff Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Bumblebee? Don't you bring that weak Bumblebee crap up in here! -=Mik ...That is his name, right? For preservation's sake.
Guest MikeSC Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Mike...did you just misspell your own name?! Ummmm......no. -=Mike
Guest MikeSC Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Bumblebee? Don't you bring that weak Bumblebee crap up in here! -=Mik ...That is his name, right? For preservation's sake. Damn. -=Mike ...My keyboard is shitty...
Hoff Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 (edited) Liar. Your ethics are shitty. Edited February 14, 2005 by Hoff
Guest MikeSC Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Liar. I prefer the phrase stretcher of truth. -=Mike
Guest Failed Mascot Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 It is mind-boggling the things you'd rather do than be a productive member of society, Mascot. -=Mike ...I'll send you a Tampax. I think you need one. Or two... This is trolling. Another rule broken. Just saying... Go nail yourself to another cross. Its ok to break the rules if you're Tom's friend.
Guest Failed Mascot Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 This thread can just be closed since nothing will come of it. Still, it shows hypocracy in the system and the reason why Josh should be the only admin other than Dames. Not because Tom is a bad guy, but because he allows his friends to shit everywhere and then doesn't clean up after them. Hopefully this doesn't keep him from letting me into his Fantasy Baseball League
The Metal Maniac Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Am I the only person who remembers Tom saying on a number of occasions that he doesn't give a flying fuck about flaming and that people should just grow up and deal with it?
Guest Loss Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Am I the only person who remembers Tom saying on a number of occasions that he doesn't give a flying fuck about flaming and that people should just grow up and deal with it? No.
KingPK Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 I think Tom added a "bloody" somewhere in there, because he thinks he's British or something. You're from Maryland, guy.
Guest Loss Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 I'm sure the words "sand", "vagina" and "thick skin" were used as well, despite the fact that in a dream world, those words are all never used in the same sentence. Unless it's a run-on like the one I just did.
Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 This board's rules are often just a bad justification for banning someone a mod (or the rest of the board, but not in this case) doesn't like anyways. If they enforced the rules, everyone would be banned, or something like that. Honestly, you should change the "BOARD RULES" post to "STRONG SUGGESTIONS"
Guest Loss Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 The key rules are that mods have full discretion to ban whoever they feel is acting like a twit and also for people to conduct themselves like human being who possess some sort of maturity. That gives them license to do what they feel is necessary, which is a good thing, since too many posters were acting like first-year law students looking for loopholes before. This board isn't a democracy nor is it fair, and really, no one should expect it to be. There's no obligation to treat two scenarios that have the exact same circumstances surrounding them the exact same way. The board is privately owned.
Guest Failed Mascot Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 I don't care about the flaming. Its more the derailing of every damned thread he enters. It just turns into a slap fight between himself and party 2.
Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 You should still change it to "Strong Suggestions."
KingPK Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Does it really matter what they are called? Wouldn't "Board Guidelines" work?
Slayer Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 I give this thread at most ten more posts before it gets closed
Guest Loss Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 It will be next time Nikjohns is online.
KingPK Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 If we keep arguing the semantics of what to call the Board Rules/Guidlines/Suggestions, it'll be sooner than that. People wanted something written down so they knew what flew and what didn't, and that's what it is. Besides, we (the Mod and Admin staff) have worked out how bannings will go down from now on, so hopefully you won't see anymore drama inducing decisions.
Guest Failed Mascot Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Besides, we (the Mod and Admin staff) have worked out how bannings will go down from now on, so hopefully you won't see anymore drama inducing decisions. 3 out of 5 in Paper, Rock, Scissors is not a good method. I thought we already discussed this.
Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 But it's really what flies some of the time and not when a mod or two is PMSing, so they're not really codified laws. They're merely strong suggestions to avoid banning when a mod feels uppity.
The Metal Maniac Posted February 15, 2005 Report Posted February 15, 2005 Besides, we (the Mod and Admin staff) have worked out how bannings will go down from now on And how's that? Like, will there have to be some sort of meeting of the mods before someone can get banned? Or can obvious trolls still be banned by the first mod who catches them?
IllustriousOne Posted February 15, 2005 Report Posted February 15, 2005 I pretty much figured that we were too strict on our banning policy, so basically, unless you're being a complete retard (which is entirely possible, given the nature of this board), you won't get banned. I'm honestly with Tom on the flaming thing, because by now, most of us are getting to be pretty old, so yeah.
Guest Failed Mascot Posted February 15, 2005 Report Posted February 15, 2005 Once again, its not an issue of flaming but watching every thread said person posts in get derailed and turn into an online slap fight.
Guest sek69 Posted February 15, 2005 Report Posted February 15, 2005 You know, just because Failed Mascot is the one who started the thread, doesn't mean the points he raised were wrong. I'm not saying Mike should be banned, but he does tend to turn threads into drawn out slapfights that veer way off topic even by CE standards. I'd hesitate to say that anyone else who would do something like that (especially in CE) would get the hammer brought down on him. It's not even a matter of disagreeing on politics with him either, its just his "I'm right because I say so, I don't have to justify it so just deal with it" mentality that makes trying to have a debate in CE an exercise in patience these days.
Modern Man's Hustle Posted February 15, 2005 Report Posted February 15, 2005 And then Failed Mascot was sent to Whiny Bitches.
Recommended Posts