Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

LOS ANGELES, California (Hollywood Reporter) -- Call it "Kill Gil."

 

Quentin Tarantino has signed to direct the season finale of primetime's most-watched series, CBS' "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation."

 

Tarantino also has come up with an original story for the episode, which is expected to shoot in early April and air May 19, according to "CSI" executive producer Carol Mendelsohn.

 

Tarantino has long been a fan of the stylish forensic drama as series creator/executive producer Anthony Zuiker learned when he bumped into Tarantino at an awards show during "CSI's" first season. They have pursued him to direct an episode for some time, and after members of the "CSI" crew ran into Tarantino a few weeks ago while the show was doing some location shooting in Las Vegas, the stars finally aligned for him to helm the show's fifth-season closer, Mendelsohn said.

 

"He knows everything there is to know about 'CSI,' and he is into the whole mythology of 'CSI,"' Mendelsohn said. "Quentin came in a couple of weeks ago. We had a story meeting with the writers. He had a great idea, and it was so much fun to have him in the room. . . . We are positively giddy."

 

Zuiker, in particular, "worships Quentin," she added.

 

Mendelsohn said the story will involve a plot that finds one of the key members of the CSI team, led by Gil Grissom (William Petersen), in serious jeopardy.

 

"There will be more bugs and blood this time," Mendelsohn joked.

 

Tarantino, who earned an Oscar for co-writing the screenplay to his 1994 smash "Pulp Fiction," directed a 1995 episode of "ER" and appeared as a guest actor on ABC's "Alias" in 2002 and last year. His other features include the "Kill Bill" films, "Jackie Brown" and "Reservoir Dogs."

 

Source: CNN.com http://www.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/TV/02/24/t...reut/index.html

Posted
Is the backstory very important when watching CSI, or could I just jump right in for this episode and still "get" everything?

Like most of these shows, they have little plot points that go show-to-show (maybe a relationship, or an unsolved case), but ultimately, it makes no difference if you see the first twenty-three episodes or not.

Posted

While I like the idea of Tarantino directing, I really dislike that some people will be watching JUST because he's directing. It seems like such a fanboy thing to do.

 

Bruckheimer should direct an episode, too.

 

Oh and DH, here is some background info on each character:

Grissom: work > personal life

Catherine: ex-stripper, dead husband

Warrick: gambling addict

Nick: sexually abused as a child

Sarah: alcoholic, mom killed dad

Guest El Satanico
Posted

Yes, damn those Tarantino fans for tuning into something Tarantino is doing.

 

How dare fans be interested in something the person in question does.

Guest Evolution
Posted

I watched the first few episodes of this season religiously, but I've fallen behind. Perhaps it's time to catch up again. I'm looking forward to this Tarantino episode, regardless.

Posted

It's going to be the first time I've ever watched CSI.

 

Gotta admit, I've always admired how William Peterson and Marg Helgenberg have never been afraid to talk about how much the spinoffs piss them off.

Posted

I started watching CSI when the Apprentice went on hiatus and it's a really good fun show. I don't like that they seem to always win but I know I'd watch it every week if it wasn't on against the Apprentice.

 

I should give the Sat reruns a try.

Posted
Yes, damn those Tarantino fans for tuning into something Tarantino is doing.

 

How dare fans be interested in something the person in question does.

All fanboys suck. Period.

Well, so does Tarantino's directing, writing, etc. so it all works out in the end now, doesn't it?

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...