PLAGIARISM! 0 Report post Posted May 6, 2005 I was gonna say Snow. He never had the look but he was quality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Fook Report post Posted May 6, 2005 I agree with Al Snow. They missed a huge opportunity to push him after the success of the first Tough Enough. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red Baron 0 Report post Posted May 6, 2005 The split is what killed the Hardyz though. Jeff is just a spot machine and that was it, and with Lita going with Matt, Jeff was soon out of a job. Kane is pretty much an underacheiver. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted May 10, 2005 Kane is a victim of poor booking, and he hadn't always been a ring dynamo anyway. I watched a little bit of Raw last night (OMGWTF) and was pleasantly surprised that Benoit wrangled a good match outta the big guy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swan 0 Report post Posted May 10, 2005 Outback Jack Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Thrashist Report post Posted May 10, 2005 I think most of the guys mentioned here--Gunn, Test, Luger, etc--are overachievers. They might not have been able to stay at the top as mentioned, but they never deserved to be in that position in the first place. Similarly, most of the people who do deserve to be on top never get the opportunity to do so. And when they do, their inability to capitalize is usually due to poor booking. With that said, I'd say Scott Hall is one example of someone who certainly had the talent, but I don't think he was focused enough to hold on to those top spots. After that, I have no idea. I'd say someone like Jericho has underachieved, but that's due to poor booking. You can say the same for Booker T, but I got the feeling when he was being pushed to the top that there was still some very small intangible missing. So in that case, it wouldn't mean he had it anyway. I'd say the same about RVD. I'm not saying neither of these guys didn't deserve to take the title though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Betty Houle 0 Report post Posted May 11, 2005 I think most of the guys mentioned here--Gunn, Test, Luger, etc--are overachievers. They might not have been able to stay at the top as mentioned, but they never deserved to be in that position in the first place. *rolls eyes* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Crimson Idol Report post Posted May 12, 2005 The Goon (come on, how can u not like the goon!?) Rhyno in WWE Credible in WWE Almost anyone from ECW who went to WWE after ECW went under Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Niggardly King 0 Report post Posted May 12, 2005 I always hear people call Raven as one of the best during the 90's. But whenever I would watch the guy it seems like he was just lazy and couldn't care less about what was going on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianGuitarist 0 Report post Posted May 12, 2005 The Goon (come on, how can u not like the goon!?) Rhyno in WWE Credible in WWE Almost anyone from ECW who went to WWE after ECW went under Dreamer, Storm, RVD, Awesome, and they have Bischoff and Shane-O-Mac headline in the summer of 2003....crazy. Credible IN ECW is debatable. Credible in WWF/E is not. Huge waste there. Though I still am a huge mark for Aldo Montoya. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
