Guest Redhawk Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 From what I see and hear, it looks like... Baseball = 40 Basketball = 32 Football = 32 Hockey = 40 Boxing = 40 Track and field = 30 Pro wrestling = 40 Gymnastics = 18 Tennis = 30 Golf = 70
Guest Vitamin X Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 I'd say that seems just about accurate, except that in football it varies wildly by position and by player. WRs and QBs don't take the same amount of pounding that say, RBs, LBs, and linemen do, and so that prolongs their longevity. Also depends on playing style and size. Larger players in the NBA rarely have as much longevity as the smaller ones.
Guest Redhawk Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 I'd say larger NBA players have more longevity. I can think of more 40-year-old Centers (Robert Parish, Dikembe Mutombo, Herb Williams, Bill Cartwright, Pat Ewing, Hakeem Olajuwon, Kareem) than I can 40-year-old point guards (Stockton, Mark Jackson?)
Masked Man of Mystery Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 I generally define athletes as old when they turn 35. That's when they generally start to slow down and generally lose skill(expections like Randy Coultre always exist, of course)
MikeJordan23 Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 You old way before 30 in tennis. and way before 40 in boxing. You lose your speed before you hit your early 30s if you started at 21. Your body wears down in that sport quicker than anyone by far. Wrestling depends. People would argue Flair didn't hit his prime until about 37 from there he had a 5 year run of excellence.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 Usually the aging process starts at 30, and accelerates from there.
Guest Vitamin X Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 28-32 is prime, 33+ you decline, DO YOU ACCEPT
Damaramu Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 28-32 is prime, 33+ you decline, DO YOU ACCEPT NO! FUCK YOU! STOP IM'N ME FROM YOUR 30 AIM ACCOUNTS! ARGH! Sorry but I have flashbacks from that time.
Guest Vitamin X Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 That guy was the best troll in the history of this board. He annoyed EVERYBODY. And he was impossible to argue against, even worse than arguing against MikeSC.
Murmuring Beast Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 In soccer it's pretty much 40. It all depends on the level of competition of course. In our league there was a guy who was 43 playing and he was as fit as many half his age. I don't know whether he'll play again next season. On the other hand we just released a guy who was 38 and he was pretty much the slowest player I've ever seen. So immobile he could hardly stay on his feet when he tried to kick the ball. He was still good in the air though.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted May 28, 2005 Report Posted May 28, 2005 28-32 is prime, 33+ you decline, DO YOU ACCEPT Heh. He was mistaken. You have to move up the time frame two years.
razazteca Posted May 29, 2005 Report Posted May 29, 2005 28 (7*2*2) and 32 (2*2*2*2*2) are not PRIME! While 31 is PRIME with the decline accelerating from there on.
CanadianGuitarist Posted May 29, 2005 Report Posted May 29, 2005 70 in golf? Certainly not old. If the Champions Tour starts at 50... Jay Haas' success and wins by Stadler and Jacobsen on the PGA tour in recent memory kinda trump that, however.
TheDevilAndGodAreRagingInsideMe Posted May 29, 2005 Report Posted May 29, 2005 I wouldn't say there is a definite, clear cut, absolute window of time for the prime years of a players career and exactly when they will decline. It differs from player to player.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now