WWE tries explaining Kane's history...

[AlaskanHero 0]

For an anti-social, psychopath, Kane sure has fucked a lot of women...

 

Anyways, I'm kind of curious about this book. I may buy it and read it, because really why not? It can't be any worse than The Rock's book (which I've read about five times, for some reason). Besides, Kane's always been a favorite character of mine. The moment Rando mentioned stands out in my memory as one of my all time favorite Kane memories.

[Guest Edgehead]

It all makes perfect sense now!

 

But seriously I am a Kane fan so this book looks to be a good laugh. Plastic surgery was it? I would love to of seen what Glen Jacob Calloway looked like before. And all those big words at 4 years old? He was a geek too.

[Guest slmon]

Is the history with Lita even in the book? How to square what we've seen on TV already with what Hardy recently said? Maybe write a section where Kane wakes up from a long, refreshing sleep and finds X-Pac in his shower. *g*

[AndrewTS 0]

"HSAN"

 

Kane's pain reactions were HasSANed?

 

Where do Kane and Taker get their ability to control fire/lightning then?

[Sideburnious 0]

Meh, it's ust Wuthering Heights but they changed the names of the characters and the cover.

[Gary Floyd 0]

Eh, I'm might skim through it for a laugh, but thats about it really. I won't but it, though it seems amusing.

[MarvinisaLunatic 0]

I wonder if Tori gets a mention..

 

Which is an interesting problem. Can they use people who were involved in Kane's storylines who aren't with the company anymore?

[cameron chaos 0]

I swear to God, if the writers aren't smoking crack, PCP, snorting coke and injecting heroin into the corners of their eyes, then there is no excuse for this. I don't know why they don't just flush the money they have down the toilet instead.

[Guest thebooker]

wouldn't they be better off trying to fix kane's onscreen character who they've

so badly messed up,oh and that was some bad writing whoever ghosted that should be ashamed.

[Guest Gary Busey]

I think it's good that they're trying to fix the mess of Kane and Undertaker's backstory. It should help resolve things, and maybe give the creative team something solid to pull from.

[Guest Brian]

I think it's good that they're trying to fix the mess of Kane and Undertaker's backstory. It should help resolve things, and maybe give the creative team something solid to pull from.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Are you talking of the same creative team the rest of us are?

 

I actually applaud the creative team for the effort to give their characters back-story, but to try and market it and sell it? And given their history on top of it, this has failure written all over it.

[Guest JMA]

I'm always impressed at how well Glen Jacobs made the ridiculous Kane gimmick work. It's too bad they always put him in shitty angles.

[Jericholic82 0]

well they already told us before the mask removal that he wasnt burned. cuz by then he was wearing a tank top where you could see both his arms (NOT BURNT) and his chest (NOT BURNT)

 

 

anyway that chapter had me cracking up

 

PAUL GRIMM????

GLEN JACOB CALLAWAY??????

 

 

And Kane is apprantly not his name but a name he took on from his family? That alone has a huge continuity error

[Gary Floyd 0]

I swear to God, if the writers aren't smoking crack, PCP, snorting coke and injecting heroin into the corners of their eyes, then there is no excuse for this..

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Well, you gotta pass the time somehow.

[Kapoutman 0]

And Kane is apprantly not his name but a name he took on from his family? That alone has a  huge continuity error

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

You're right. I remember that when kane started on TV, JR and The King mentioned that Undertaker thought his brother was killed in the fire, so he took his name as an hommage of sort when he started as "Kane The Undertaker". If you follow logic, Undertaker's first ring name should have been "Glen The Undertaker" then.

 

Not that it is supposed to make sense.

[claydude14 0]

Fuck it, I gotta buy this or at least go into Borders and read this one.

[Jericholic82 0]

And Kane is apprantly not his name but a name he took on from his family? That alone has a  huge continuity error

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

You're right. I remember that when kane started on TV, JR and The King mentioned that Undertaker thought his brother was killed in the fire, so he took his name as an hommage of sort when he started as "Kane The Undertaker". If you follow logic, Undertaker's first ring name should have been "Glen The Undertaker" then.

 

Not that it is supposed to make sense.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Thanx for the feedback

 

anyhow, the only ones it might make sense to are younger marks. though I belive even If I was still a mark, having watched wwf/e for 15 plus years I would notcie the continuity problems.

[Dangerous A 0]

WWE even making this book has to be a rib of some sort, probrably on fans intelligence and common sense.

[Guest Demon llama]

The only moments that I marked out for that had Kane involved was his debut, and his explosive return during that 5 on 5 tag match which had Kane helping The Rock, Foley, and Too Cool fight off DX. That was awesome.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

the was the best match on RAW i have seen, the crowd was HOT the enitre match and they all exploded when came Kane out, i need to find that video!

[Nightfall 0]

And Kane is apprantly not his name but a name he took on from his family? That alone has a  huge continuity error

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

You're right. I remember that when kane started on TV, JR and The King mentioned that Undertaker thought his brother was killed in the fire, so he took his name as an hommage of sort when he started as "Kane The Undertaker". If you follow logic, Undertaker's first ring name should have been "Glen The Undertaker" then.

 

Not that it is supposed to make sense.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

 

I never heard the announcers saying that about Taker using Kane's name. I have heard the rumor that Taker used that name back in 1990 when he first came in. But again, I don't remember JR or King saying that he did it.

[Guest Korgath]

I don't know how you guys survived reading all that shit. I'm not a literary expert, but that's the worst piece of fiction EVER. Even after Hogan's book.