Guest Kamehameha Posted October 12, 2005 Report Posted October 12, 2005 I just like Smackdown more because of the better roster. If you really think about it Smackdown roster upstages the raw roster with their own -Chris Benoit-Batista -Eddie Guerrero-Undertaker ect who all are a Hell of a hand to the Smackdown product! mackdown has more star power than raw of Chris Benoit, Batista, Undertaker, and many others such as Road Warrior Animal.. who funny enough also are all my fav wrestlers! Raw do have Hogan, Austin ect but if you think about it, they never Wrestle or are boring in the ring. Unlike the Smackdown superstars which are great IMO. what brand do you like more?
Guest Kamehameha Posted October 12, 2005 Report Posted October 12, 2005 And give a reason for your votings. i just hate blind voters. they suck!
Black Lushus Posted October 12, 2005 Report Posted October 12, 2005 this is not the best way to begin your career here at thesmartmarks.com
Guest Kamehameha Posted October 12, 2005 Report Posted October 12, 2005 this is not the best way to begin your career here at thesmartmarks.com <{POST_SNAPBACK}> huh? what are you talkin about
Black Lushus Posted October 12, 2005 Report Posted October 12, 2005 don't get angry, I'm just giving you some advice...
Guest Kamehameha Posted October 12, 2005 Report Posted October 12, 2005 don't get angry, I'm just giving you some advice... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> i dont understand you.
bob_barron Posted October 12, 2005 Report Posted October 12, 2005 Read your posts before you post them.
Precious Roy Posted October 12, 2005 Report Posted October 12, 2005 Neither. Aside from some cosmetic differences the shows are written and booked in exactly the same way. If SD was booked properly, with the focus on wrestling-based storylines and the spotlight on the cruiserweights my answer would be different, but it isn't.
Dangerous A Posted October 12, 2005 Report Posted October 12, 2005 If you only gave the options of Raw or SD, I'd have taken SD. Since you gave neither, I picked that since ROH, TNA, Lucha, and my old puro tapes dwarf Raw and SD in quality.
Guest I miss Test. Posted October 12, 2005 Report Posted October 12, 2005 Neither. Raw is boring. Fridays are for having sex.
Gary Floyd Posted October 12, 2005 Report Posted October 12, 2005 Smackdown. Raw is once again the "McMahon Show", and Smackdown is actually enjoyable to me these days.
Lord of The Curry Posted October 12, 2005 Report Posted October 12, 2005 Neither. Both shows can WWEat a dick.
Cheech Tremendous Posted October 12, 2005 Report Posted October 12, 2005 I completely gave up on Smackdown last year to the point where I pretty much didn't even read the spoilers anymore. It bored me that much. Granted, I'd be willing to give it another try, but there is no way I'm staying home on a Friday night. Raw by default.
Jebus Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 I chose SmackDown even though that's the one I don't watch anymore due to Friday nights being when you go out and hang out. Since I have nothing to do or watch on Monday, I watch Raw although I wish it were SD with Benoit, Christian, JBL, Rey, Eddie and Batista. RAW has Angle and...that's it...oh wait, Trish is nice to look at
ZGangsta Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 Neither are worth my time anymore. I almost never watch either of the shows (I havn't seen anything of Smackdown in months). I ocasionally watch a segment or 2 of RAW and I still read about what happens. From reading on the net, I'd have to pick Smackdown over RAW for the last few weeks, but since there was a 'neither' option I choose TNA.
Guest Coffey Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 I'm sure this isn't the most popular opinion but I voted for Raw because Smackdown doesn't have Triple H. Yeah, I said it. I'm a mark. Also, Maria isn't on Smackdown.
cabbageboy Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 I voted for Smackdown since the show is never hideously bad it seems like, whereas Raw tends to go off the deep end with stuff like the McMahons/JR angle the other night. You know, reading this is interesting. It seems like a lot of people on here give this same act of "WWE sucks now, I don't watch it anymore." I find it curious. Why would someone who no longer cared about the shows and didn't watch anymore actually spend time posting on a WWE forum? I do still watch the shows, but if I ever stop I'd probably have little reason to post on this forum (which isn't to say I wouldn't still visit the sports, movies, etc.).
Guest I miss Test. Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 Why would someone who no longer cared about the shows and didn't watch anymore actually spend time posting on a WWE forum? Some people are eternally miserable and enjoy bitching about everything. None as much as me, though.
2GOLD Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 I'm sure this isn't the most popular opinion but I voted for Raw because Smackdown doesn't have Triple H. Yeah, I said it. I'm a mark. Also, Maria isn't on Smackdown. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Maria = ratings
Guest *KNK* Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 Neither. Wrestling sucks now. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No, wrestling does not suck. WWE sucks but that's not wrestling.
Kahran Ramsus Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 I voted Smackdown, and the only reason it isn't neither is because there are enough guys on Smackdown that I still like watching to enjoy the show most weeks (although dud shows certainly do occur). Every once in a while they still put on a great show, but the average show is still enjoyable enough despite many flaws. With RAW, I have trouble even enjoying the 'good' shows because aside from two or three guys the talent is really lacking and lately they've been wasting them in feuds with deadweight like Chris Masters & Ric Flair. When Ric Flair holds the second highest belt on the show, there is a major problem with the talent level. Even if they decide to push Benjamin, that's just one guy and he can't make up for the enormous talent deficit by himself. So like I said, a case can certainly be made for neither, especially if you dislike Taker & JBL (I don't), but even if you do the rest of the card outside of the top level is very much skewed in Smackdown's favour. RAW can put on better main events than Smackdown at times, but the show's midcard is barren and an absolute chore to sit through to get to said main event.
Black Lushus Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 Also, Maria isn't on Smackdown. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Maria = ratings <{POST_SNAPBACK}> dese two men aint nevah lied...
Guest Kamehameha Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 So it looks to be more Smackdown fans out there than the raw fans.
Carnival Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 Kamehameha, do you know XxxMariaSantosxxX?
TheFranchise Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 I voted for Raw, because at least they get some names occasionally, even if they serve no purpose, and when it's live, at least you can be surprised.
Guest Kamehameha Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 Kamehameha, do you know XxxMariaSantosxxX? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> no.......... ?
Team Angle Pusher Posted October 13, 2005 Report Posted October 13, 2005 She is a legend, shame she isn't on the forum anymore. Shit happens. I voted Smackdown! cause they have better matches and better wrestlers as well. Cruiserweight Division > Womens Division. Ken Kennedy > Carlitfro (Edge's joke) etc....only bad thing about SD! is probably Orlando Jordan getting more air time then the Mexicools and Paul London & Spanky together...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now