Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No. Compare your posts to *KNK*. You'd be deluding yourself to think your stuff is anything better than his. And it has nothing to do with our interaction. Hell I am pretty sure I'm a shitty poster in other people's eyes, and that is fine with me.

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
No. Compare your posts to *KNK*. You'd be deluding yourself to think your stuff is anything better than his. And it has nothing to do with our interaction. Hell I am pretty sure I'm a shitty poster in other people's eyes, and that is fine with me.

 

we're talking liquid shit here buddy! :P j/k

Guest Fishyswa
Posted

"No. Compare your posts to *KNK*."

 

Why? What do my posts have to do with his constant negativity? Please answer that.

 

"You'd be deluding yourself to think your stuff is anything better than his."

 

Alright well considering this is all coming from you I'm not gonna take it seriously. Thanks anyway.

 

"And it has nothing to do with our interaction."

 

Yeah I saw a lot of this before all that. Don't be a liar, nobody likes a liar.

 

"Hell I am pretty sure I'm a shitty poster in other people's eyes, and that is fine with me."

 

It's fine with me too, but I'm still not sure why my posts are relevant. I'm sure you'll clear that up though.....

Posted
"No. Compare your posts to *KNK*."

 

Why? What do my posts have to do with his constant negativity? Please answer that.

 

"You'd be deluding yourself to think your stuff is anything better than his."

 

Alright well considering this is all coming from you I'm not gonna take it seriously. Thanks anyway.

 

"And it has nothing to do with our interaction."

 

Yeah I saw a lot of this before all that. Don't be a liar, nobody likes a liar.

 

"Hell I am pretty sure I'm a shitty poster in other people's eyes, and that is fine with me."

 

It's fine with me too, but I'm still not sure why my posts are relevant. I'm sure you'll clear that up though.....

 

 

Constant negativity? You mean being realistic? Ah well yeah if being realistic equates to being a bad poster...

 

It's not my problem if you're going to take things personally and think that I'm saying this just because I hate you (which I do not, you're of no consequences to me, accept that).

 

You say *KNK* is bad, I point at your posts. It's something similar to "Pot...kettle...black."

Guest Fishyswa
Posted

"Constant negativity? You mean being realistic? Ah well yeah if being realistic equates to being a bad poster..."

 

So it's a WWE bias? If your saying two people are doing the exact same thing and it's ok for one because you agree, please explain how that's not bias?

 

"It's not my problem if you're going to take things personally and think that I'm saying this just because I hate you (which I do not, you're of no consequences to me, accept that)."

 

Hate's a strong word, but coming into a thread to talk about someone who's of no consequence to you when it's irrelevant to the discussion is a pretty strong action. Again, I don't remember you doing this before we disagreed, so it's an easy assumption to make....

 

"You say *KNK* is bad, I point at your posts. It's something similar to "Pot...kettle...black.""

 

Ok but remember, it's according to you, so it carries no weight. It's also irrelevant to the point. The quality of his posts are irrelevant, because the tone is constantly negative, and that's what Mike got banned for, so why is it ok for him to do the same thing?

 

A pot calling the kettle black would be KNK telling Mike he's constantly negative. That's not too hard to get.

Posted
"Constant negativity? You mean being realistic? Ah well yeah if being realistic equates to being a bad poster..."

 

So it's a WWE bias? If your saying two people are doing the exact same thing and it's ok for one because you agree, please explain how that's not bias?

 

"It's not my problem if you're going to take things personally and think that I'm saying this just because I hate you (which I do not, you're of no consequences to me, accept that)."

 

Hate's a strong word, but coming into a thread to talk about someone who's of no consequence to you when it's irrelevant to the discussion is a pretty strong action. Again, I don't remember you doing this before we disagreed, so it's an easy assumption to make....

 

"You say *KNK* is bad, I point at your posts. It's something similar to "Pot...kettle...black.""

 

Ok but remember, it's according to you, so it carries no weight. It's also irrelevant to the point. The quality of his posts are irrelevant, because the tone is constantly negative, and that's what Mike got banned for, so why is it ok for him to do the same thing?

 

A pot calling the kettle black would be KNK telling Mike he's constantly negative. That's not too hard to get.

 

 

I see your point. I concede. However, I'm just saying that *KNK* to me seems to be a decent poster. If you don't think so, well that's your right.

Posted

Why was Mike banned? For acting like Mike, so good riddance. End of discussion.

Posted
You weren't here in his Golden Age, so SHUT UP!

link1.jpg

Well excuuuuuse me princess!

 

(God, that was an awful show)

Posted

^ No. In one thread about trying 16 year olds as adults for crimes, Mike insisted that he was the same person mentally at 16 that he is today. Telling, I suppose.

 

Overall, it's nice that he's gone, but I'm not celebrating. He's a case of cancer that won't stay in remission.

Posted

Why don't we all just use the board's ignore feature instead of being bitches and asking for people to get banned?

 

Although, admittedly, when MikeSC posted here it would have been difficult to ignore him because he posted so much and in almost every thread (in CE anyway).

Posted
Ya wanna hear a true story?

 

I was 17. I just seperated with Stacy. I went to my Aunt's house to swim. I wound up deciding to stay the night.

 

My aunt went to bed at Midnight and told me I could sleep in My cousin Jane's room. Whom was 19 and living with her girlfriend.

 

I went to a party and returned at about 3' 0 clock. In order not to wake my aunt up...I slowly opened the door. I was stunned when I saw my Cousin Jane in bed, Nude. Masturbating. I was silent as I watched her. Le me describe her...she's 6' tall with long black hair and perky tits.

 

She finished about 10 minutes later and she had no clue I waseven there watching. I clapped as she looked up and saw me in the door.

 

Needless to say, She was pissed. She cussed at me for a moment and I calmed her down saying it was okay. It was cool. We shared the bed and watched one of her Lesbo pornos and slept nude together. It was warm and pleasant.

Yeah that blows Fishyswa out of the water, you gotta admit. The only thing I know about Fishyswa is that he does his line-by-line breakdowns with quotation marks instead of quote boxes.

Posted
I thought Porter was Slayer there for a second...

So did I, I was like "Why would Slayer think he's a bad poster" then I saw it was Porter and it all made sense. :P Nah, I got no problem with Porter.

 

The only thing I know about Fishyswa is that he does his line-by-line breakdowns with quotation marks instead of quote boxes.

 

I'm starting to think thats his gimmick.

Guest Fishyswa
Posted

"s are easier in quick reply. It's not hard to read if you're actually reading it and not just skimming.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...