Mole Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 1 N Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire WB $101,425,000 - 3,858 - $26,289 $101,425,000 $150 1 2 N Walk the Line Fox $22,400,000 - 2,961 - $7,565 $22,400,000 - 1 3 1 Chicken Little BV $14,769,000 -53.3% 3,514 -144 $4,202 $99,151,000 - 3 4 3 Derailed Wein. $6,526,000 -46.6% 2,447 +6 $2,666 $21,837,000 $22 2 5 2 Zathura Sony $5,100,000 -62.0% 3,232 +9 $1,577 $20,283,000 $65 2 6 5 Jarhead Uni. $4,790,000 -59.2% 2,413 -35 $1,985 $54,317,000 $72 3 7 4 Get Rich or Die Tryin' Par. $4,375,000 -63.6% 1,666 +14 $2,626 $24,502,000 $40 2 8 6 Saw II Lions $3,900,000 -57.3% 2,257 -692 $1,727 $79,857,000 $4 4 9 7 The Legend of Zorro Sony $2,300,000 -64.0% 2,150 -903 $1,069 $42,785,000 $75 4 10 10 Pride and Prejudice Focus $2,112,000 -26.3% 221 +6 $9,556 $5,971,000 - 2 11 11 Good Night, and Good Luck. WIP $1,695,000 -32.2% 803 +135 $2,110 $16,882,000 $7 7 12 8 Prime Uni. $1,610,000 -58.4% 1,229 -552 $1,310 $21,446,000 $22 4
2GOLD Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 Good to see "Walk the line" due well. And I could care less about the numbers for Harry Potter.
Mole Posted November 20, 2005 Author Report Posted November 20, 2005 4th highest ever to reach #1. And it did it without a holiday.
LJSexay Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 so. why do Kiera Knightley's movies do so horrible in the Box Office? Is it really because they all suck, save POTC?
Youth N Asia Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 4th highest ever to reach #1. And it did it without a holiday. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I thought Bob Barron was the one with those facts. I actually saw Shopgirl this week. Which wasn't high on my list, but cuddling up with a nice girl in an empty theater is always good
razazteca Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 so. why do Kiera Knightley's movies do so horrible in the Box Office? Is it really because they all suck, save POTC? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> People are sick of Jane Austin remakes?
SuperJerk Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 1 N Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire WB $101,425,000 - 3,858 - $26,289 $101,425,000 $150 1 That's unbelievable. How many other movies have made that kind of money in one weekend?
Mole Posted November 21, 2005 Author Report Posted November 21, 2005 1 N Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire WB $101,425,000 - 3,858 - $26,289 $101,425,000 $150 1 That's unbelievable. How many other movies have made that kind of money in one weekend? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Sith, Matrix Reloaded and Spidey.
SuperJerk Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 1 N Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire WB $101,425,000 - 3,858 - $26,289 $101,425,000 $150 1 That's unbelievable. How many other movies have made that kind of money in one weekend? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Sith, Matrix Reloaded and Spidey. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Again, wow.
2GOLD Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 so. why do Kiera Knightley's movies do so horrible in the Box Office? Is it really because they all suck, save POTC? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> People are sick of Jane Austin remakes? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> People are sick of bad Jane Austin remakes. She still has her fans but the remakes come like 10 years or less apart. It's getting kind of nuts. Plus let's face it, Keira just isn't a box office draw. She'll still have the Pirate movies so she'll get work.
Guest El Satanico Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 Domino is her only "box office friendly" movie, where she could be considered the main draw. I don't consider Jane Austen films to be "box office friendly".
razazteca Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 Pride and Prejudice is on 221 theaters so it was not expected to be the #1 movie of the week but released at this time for the sole purpose of winning the best costume award at the Academy Awards.
ZGangsta Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 No way I want to defend Pride and Prejudice, because I'm sure it blows, but yeah it only played on 221 screens and got a pretty damn high PSA. And wow, that is some HUGE numbers for Harry Potter.
razazteca Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 It opened with 3,858 screens that had to be the biggest opening ever.
bob_barron Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 No, other movies have opened on more screens.
dubq Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 Good to see "Walk the line" due well. And I could care less about the numbers for Harry Potter. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Seconded. Walk the Line was amazing!
Youth N Asia Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 Seeing Walk the Line on Tuesday, with a nice gal
Failed Bridge Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 Seeing Walk the Line on Tuesday, with a nice gal <{POST_SNAPBACK}> your mom? I know my mom wants to see it. Kiera Knightley needs to add 20lbs and then do a sex scene. I don't care if pirates are involved in said scene either.
dubq Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 Seeing Walk the Line on Tuesday, with a nice gal <{POST_SNAPBACK}> your mom? I know my mom wants to see it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Are you implying that only older folk would enjoy a Johnny Cash biopic? Not so. There were tons of young-adults and even teens in the theatre that I went to.
Failed Bridge Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 I was playfully ripping on him actually
the max Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 Me and the girlfriend took in Harry Potter on sunday. It wasn't as crowded as I thought it would have been, and I was entertained for the duration of it despite never reading one of the books and seeing five minutes of one of the movies on ABCFamily a few months ago. We'll be seeing Derailed and Jarhead soon enough.
Youth N Asia Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 I was playfully ripping on him actually <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, it may have been too hysterical and gone right over youe head.
dubq Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 Internet sarcasm is lost on me, friends.
Guest El Satanico Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 Kiera Knightley needs to add 20lbs<{POST_SNAPBACK}> No, she doesn't...she's not anorexic. She has a naturaly thin atheletic build, and there's not a god damn thing wrong with that.
cabbageboy Posted November 21, 2005 Report Posted November 21, 2005 It's not so much that she's anorexic but she could definitely use a few lbs. in the right places. Not much to grab hold of as is.
Dr. Zaius Posted November 22, 2005 Report Posted November 22, 2005 It's not so much that she's anorexic but she could definitely use a few lbs. in the right places. Not much to grab hold of as is. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You mean she needs tits. Got it. You know what you call Kiera Knightly with a better body? Natalie Portman.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now