2GOLD Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 I just want the 'Hawks to get to the Super Bowl. Obviously, I want them to win, but if they make it to the big game, I think they'll have erased the stigma of being chokers. The only reason I can think of to hate the 'Hawks is that they've made it to the playoffs a couple times, simply because they played in a shitty division. That talk can be put to rest some this season, though they did have a very easy schedule. Losing the big game isn't going to erase the stigma of being a choker. It just means they choked on a bigger level. Just as long as Hasselbeck isn't stupid enough to predict they are going to win the Super Bowl before the NFC title game and everything will be fine.
Slayer Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 I don't really hate the Seahawks, but they've always seemed to be one of those "meh, they're there" teams that you know they exist, but you just can't care about them, win or lose. The funny thing is a Seattle/Denver SB would be a match of what were once division rivals... but I don't even think fans of those teams would care about that.
nl5xsk1 Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 I have to do something that I really don't like doing: admit that I was wrong. I've been very vocal that Troy Palomalo is overrated, and really have to eat my words. He's not the all-world player that Steeler fans say he is, but I will full-on admit that he's one of the top 5 safeties in the game. Man, I feel dirty for saying that.
megaadvice Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 Every man, women, dog and so called expert picked Carolina to get to the super bowl
Red Baron Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 Every man, women, dog and so called expert picked Carolina to get to the super bowl And those exact same people predicted that Arizona would be in the wild card spot and Seattle was going to struggle and get to 500 this year.
sfaJack Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 It still amazes me that so many people thought the Cardinals were going to be so good. As for this weekend, I'm taking Denver and Seattle. I think the Steelers have a very good chance to win (and a better chance than Carolina), but I see the Broncos getting some sort of fluke play to swing the game late and survive. In the other game, the Panthers will because they'll be missing DeShaun Foster, forcing Jake Delhomme into a bad game.
The Man in Blak Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 I'm a little perplexed as to why everybody thinks the Panthers are going to be passing all day long. Nick Goings isn't Foster or even Stephen Davis, but he's still a very capable back - guy rushed for five 100 yard games in 2004. I'm sure they'll have to alter their gameplay a little bit, but Goings is still capable of keeping the Seattle D honest.
MrRant Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 I truly think that the Seahawks get a bum rap not only due to the division but the fact that no one usually gets to see them play.
Guest Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 I think it's a lack of a star QB. They aren't really marketable.
Guest Princess Leena Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 It still amazes me that so many people thought the Cardinals were going to be so good. The common fan overrates the importance of a few good WR's, and a potentially good offense. Especially the fans here, who are mostly idiots about football. Although, they've never seen winning football, so I guess it's understandable. Plus, people went overboard with how horrible they thought the NFC West would be.
Guest Coffey Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 I'm predicting Carolina & Denver making it to the Super Bowl. I'd prefer if the Steelers got there but as a Green Bay fan, I don't really care. Bettis went to Notre Dame, so I want them to win it all.
Red Baron Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 I'm a little perplexed as to why everybody thinks the Panthers are going to be passing all day long. Nick Goings isn't Foster or even Stephen Davis, but he's still a very capable back - guy rushed for five 100 yard games in 2004. I'm sure they'll have to alter their gameplay a little bit, but Goings is still capable of keeping the Seattle D honest. But you are up against the best Run defence in the league and a somewhat decent offensive. Seattle had also 12 different playrs with sacks this year, which is amazing considering they can attack from all different sides.
cabbageboy Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 The Steelers under Cowher have lost so many AFC title games it isn't funny. Now they get a Broncos team undefeated at home this year and the end result will likely be the same. I'll take Denver by 7 or so. It's awful tough to win 3 straight road playoff games. In terms of the Seahawks/Panthers, I'm not sure. I think it'll be really close but the Seahawks are also undefeated at home so they should scrape by with a narrow win.
Red Baron Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 By offense i meant to say Pass Defence
Special K Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 One thing I think will help Pittsburgh out a lot is that they can switch in and out their RBs with regularity, preventing them from sucking wind. It's very hard for an every-down back to succeed in the thin air of Denver.
Guest Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 That game is going to be in the area of 17-14. I can guarantee Plummer will throw a pick for a TD.
Hawk 34 Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 I think it's a lack of a star QB. They aren't really marketable. Jake Delhomme is a star? At least Seattle can pimp the MVP status on their team. What's marketable about Carolina? A WR that is generally 5th or 6th mentioned in regards to WR's (not neccesarily talent wise mind you).
Guest Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 It goes like this. Plummer is noted for his chokes and his (in)ability to lead a team in the 4th quarter, Delhomme is noted for his personality, Ben is noted for riding motorcycles and shit, but what is Hasselbeck noted for? Choking in Green Bay? Carolina is noted as a hard working team, but they aren't marketable either. Only marketable team in the playoffs left is the Steelers.
JHawk Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 Honestly, as a Browns fan I don't care which teams win this weekend as long as the NFC team wins the Super Bowl. Yeah, I'm bitter. So what?
Hawk 34 Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 It goes like this. Plummer is noted for his chokes and his (in)ability to lead a team in the 4th quarter, Delhomme is noted for his personality, Ben is noted for riding motorcycles and shit, but what is Hasselbeck noted for? Choking in Green Bay? Carolina is noted as a hard working team, but they aren't marketable either. Only marketable team in the playoffs left is the Steelers. Hasselbeck does have a hot and semi-famous sister in law...
Guest Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 You have a point, but I don't want FOX going to Quinn-like levels of covering significant others. EDIT: Again.
Hawk 34 Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 You have a point, but I don't want FOX going to Quinn-like levels of covering significant others. EDIT: Again. ABC. Which kinda is okay because she works for ABC.
Guest Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 The again was because I seem to remember that sister in law of Matt Hasselbeck's being shown a lot during a Washington game that Tim was in.
Hawk 34 Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 The again was because I seem to remember that sister in law of Matt Hasselbeck's being shown a lot during a Washington game that Tim was in. I know, I am just saying the game is on ABC this year so ABC/ESPN can just pretend to be promoting The View during the superbowl hype or something. In reality, it's the only worthwhile thing about Hasselbeck other then the OT in GB incident.
The Czech Republic Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 Jaysis, how did that slip my mind? I think they built Seahawks stadeum too small to even host a SB ever, stupid Seattle. Like Seattle in early February would be a Super Bowl destination. By the way, CN Tower : Space Needle : penis :: SkyDome : Seahawks Stadium : vagina
Lt. Al Giardello Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 I think it's a lack of a star QB. They aren't really marketable. Jake Delhomme is a star? At least Seattle can pimp the MVP status on their team. What's marketable about Carolina? A WR that is generally 5th or 6th mentioned in regards to WR's (not neccesarily talent wise mind you). That's a joke right? Steve Smith during and after the regular season was regarded as one of, if not the best WR in the NFL. He had the stats to prove it also.
Hawk 34 Posted January 18, 2006 Report Posted January 18, 2006 I think it's a lack of a star QB. They aren't really marketable. Jake Delhomme is a star? At least Seattle can pimp the MVP status on their team. What's marketable about Carolina? A WR that is generally 5th or 6th mentioned in regards to WR's (not neccesarily talent wise mind you). That's a joke right? Steve Smith during and after the regular season was regarded as one of, if not the best WR in the NFL. He had the stats to prove it also. Reading comprehension is a nice tool to learn. Ask an regular joe, name five current NFL WR'S They will name Johnson, T.O, Moss almost instantly and the other two would depend on that person's location. It's not a matter of talent/stats and what the tv experts say, the point in question was marketability, something Steve Smith hasn't reached yet. Discussion of talent was never mentioned.
CanadianChris Posted January 19, 2006 Author Report Posted January 19, 2006 I could care less about the NFC game COULDN'T care less. Either way is correct, Faulty Grammar Nazi.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now