Guest nokia Posted February 24, 2006 Report Posted February 24, 2006 * As always; This is "the" Warrior we're talking abou, so take that into consideration when reading this "ULTIMATE WARRIOR ON TNA In a message on his website, UltimateWarrior.com, the Ultimate Warrior wrote that he'd like to wrestle Bill Goldberg in TNA. "It would be very interesting. What would be more interesting is if the TNA execs had the creativity, integrity and balls to entertain it seriously. Frankly, what they should do, if they want to be competitive (there's that nasty blood, sweat and tears word again), is sell some of those construction materials Daddy Jarrett has laying around, and put up the financing to bring in Goldberg and Ultimate Warrior and let us try to beat the intensity out of one another. Now there's an idea--an attention getting one, and a money making one. "I mean, instead of always using "warrior" as the adjective to fallaciously describe all those who aren't -- bring a real, and Ultimate, one in. Let the hardcore, natural intensity rip. Let both of us take our mischaracterized heads halfway out of our asses, just enough for us to be businessmen capable of discussing the serious potential success yet not enough to defuse a competitive grudge, and let the serious and creative thinkers at TNA, those without an agenda or envy problem, work out a program. Put your silly ass fear and prejudice for my strong, bold character away and think SUCCESS. Hell, I'm all for great ideas. But don't expect me to keep my mouth shut when you don't come up with any. "Of course, as I hinted at, it won't be inexpensive. Goldberg has an agent and has to give him a cut. I'm my own and I charge even more. The bigger obstacle, and definitely the one that has us both the most hated in the industry, is that we are strong individualists who don't need, or even necessarily want, to be in the business and can get along having great lives without it. But, what a way it would be for the most envied and despised to shove the final word down the throats of those Nor'Easterners, while TNA capitalizes off the incredible heat of it all." * It could be huge, but the money & ego would be a problem...
Dangerous A Posted February 24, 2006 Report Posted February 24, 2006 It would be a joke because no one believes or buys into Warrior anymore. BTW, the entire rant, where he goes off on Sting, the internet, Abe Lincoln, etc is in the General Wrestling folder right now.
2GOLD Posted February 24, 2006 Report Posted February 24, 2006 Huge? Come on, Warrior is done. Anyone who saw him in WCW knows that ship sailed, caught fire and sank into the ocean.
buffybeast Posted February 25, 2006 Report Posted February 25, 2006 WTF? Is Warrior smoking that crack pipe again? No one has cared about Warrior since 1990.
The Buzz Posted February 25, 2006 Report Posted February 25, 2006 While I know it's the cool thing on the net to hate The Warrior, I'd enjoy seeing those two stiff each other. Because I'm a fan of The Warrior and what do you know I'm also a fan of Benoit, Samoa Joe, Eddie Guerrero, and many other "workrate" wrestlers. The Warrior vs Goldberg as much as some might want to deny it, would draw some buyrates. I'd rather see someone like The Rock or Chris Jericho, but neither are possible. So Goldberg vs Warrior would work damn well for me for a one off appearance from some big stars.
razazteca Posted February 25, 2006 Report Posted February 25, 2006 Bringing in Warrior for a brief 2 month period to get mainstream attention is no different than TNA hiring the baseball players or the NASCAR people or bringing in Toby Keith. I have no problem with this.
Scroby Posted February 25, 2006 Report Posted February 25, 2006 TNA's answer to this should be plain and simple..... No. The reasons are really to easy to give. Anyone should understand why.
CBright7831 Posted February 25, 2006 Report Posted February 25, 2006 Anyone remember when Warrior called out TNA a few years ago? I would tell him to fuck off.
razazteca Posted February 25, 2006 Report Posted February 25, 2006 TNA's answer to this should be plain and simple..... No. The reasons are really to easy to give. Anyone should understand why. Warrior would no sell the guitar shot and Stroke then squash Jarrett in 30 seconds?
Guest new jack 4 prez Posted February 25, 2006 Report Posted February 25, 2006 put it on one of the virgina house shows and never mention it on tv and never use them agian
Si82 Posted February 25, 2006 Report Posted February 25, 2006 put it on one of the virgina house shows and never mention it on tv and never use them agian Considering the money that TNA would have to pay wouldn't it just give them a massive loss?
Guest new jack 4 prez Posted February 25, 2006 Report Posted February 25, 2006 put it on one of the virgina house shows and never mention it on tv and never use them agian Considering the money that TNA would have to pay wouldn't it just give them a massive loss? yeah your right. this is when i miss wcw becuase they would do something like that
Guest Korgath Posted February 26, 2006 Report Posted February 26, 2006 I just like how he admits that he charges more than Goldberg... and that the money will ALL go to him... YAY~
Guest ChampKind Posted February 26, 2006 Report Posted February 26, 2006 Warrior probably charges more than Goldberg so he has a built in excuse when no one hires him. Q: So Warrior, why haven't you worked in a ring for nearly 8 years? A: NO ONE CAN MEET MY PRICE TAG YOU LIBERAL HOMO!
iggymcfly Posted February 26, 2006 Report Posted February 26, 2006 Goldberg/Warrior. Now there's the match the fans have been clamoring for. I think it's right behind Rikishi/Earthquake as a dream match that could give TNA credibility and vault them into the mainstream.
Guest Coffey Posted February 26, 2006 Report Posted February 26, 2006 Goldberg in TNA would be really beneficial to the company. The biggest problem would be getting anyone to go over him in a believable scenario. A Jeff Jarrett guitar shot and a couple run-ins from midcard jobbers isn't believable. WARRIOR is a joke though and doesn't bring anything to the table that was demolished by his last WCW run.
Red Baron Posted February 27, 2006 Report Posted February 27, 2006 I say that this article is fake because he's not using his real name of WARRIOR WARRIOR!!! ARGH1!!
Vyce Posted February 27, 2006 Report Posted February 27, 2006 Don't act as if Warrior v. Goldberg wouldn't pop a buyrate. The sheer trainwreck of it would bring in the $$$. I would have to break my "I don't pay for PPVs except on DVD" rule just for the pure morbidity of seeing that match live.
Hunter's Torn Quad Posted February 27, 2006 Report Posted February 27, 2006 Goldberg vs. Warrior couldn't sell buys to their own families. Any PPV with the match as a main event would need the mother of all undercards not to bomb.
razazteca Posted February 27, 2006 Report Posted February 27, 2006 WARRIOR brings much needed INTENSITY~ The least he could do would be to teach Rhyno, Abyss, and Monty Brown how to grunt, run to the ring, and how to get over by pandering to the crowd. WARRIOR University needs to open a branch in Florida! WARRIOR could teach: Monty is half way there with his promo style but is still missing the "it" factor Abyss has the grunt pose working for him but never talks Rhyno has the run to the ring entrance but also has limited interview skills
Lil' Bitch Posted February 28, 2006 Report Posted February 28, 2006 WCW not booking Goldberg / Warrior was another dumb decision they made when they had both guys on the payroll.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted February 28, 2006 Report Posted February 28, 2006 Both were faces at the time. Yeah it was real dumb
Guest shark boy super fan Posted March 2, 2006 Report Posted March 2, 2006 WCW not booking Goldberg / Warrior was another dumb decision they made when they had both guys on the payroll. WCW could of booked it at Starcade 98 and had Golodberg pick-up the win instead of having Nash get the belt which ended up contributing to WCW's death
SuperJerk Posted March 3, 2006 Report Posted March 3, 2006 Now there's an idea -- an attention getting one, and a money making one. I mean, instead of always using "warrior" as the adjective to fallaciously describe all those who aren't -- bring a real, and Ultimate, one in. I cannot stop laughing at this. Someone needs THE CHECK THAT IS REALITY!!!![/warrior speak]
Guest burth179 Posted March 28, 2006 Report Posted March 28, 2006 The Warrior wasn't even in WCW long enough to face Goldberg in 98. After the awful match with Hogan, WCW and Warrior could not come to a full-time contract arrangement and he was gone from the company. And even if they would have kept him, unless Warrior was going to abruptuly turn heel, they both would have been faces.... I don't believe the Warrior has ever worked heel, however I think that could be something new for him. Most of the "smarks" hate the guy, so why not take advantage and make him a heel to wrestle Goldberg? Well, he does REALLY suck I just forgot, heel or face. I guess that is why they don't do it!
luke-o Posted March 29, 2006 Report Posted March 29, 2006 I was a fan of the Warrior when i was younger. but after watching the documentary, you do loose a lot of respect for him. and him saying, "heenan getting cancer is good karma" is just unaceptable. i wouldn't want to see him in TNA, the guy is dangerous and very unreliable.
Guest Timmer Posted March 29, 2006 Report Posted March 29, 2006 Please don't let it be the Warrior who is on Sting's speed dial... or Lex Luger
luke-o Posted March 30, 2006 Report Posted March 30, 2006 Shit yeah i didnt think of that. Lets hope it someone a little bit better than them.
Darthtiki Posted March 30, 2006 Report Posted March 30, 2006 Warrior and AJ = The Ultimate Homophobic Tag Team
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now