Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 412
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Tilt sensor means nothing. It ain't the same.

 

I'm sure Nintendo has patents out the whazzang on that thing.

 

What did they change the PS3 controller to? The boomerang was fine.

Posted
Tilt sensor means nothing. It ain't the same.

 

I'm sure Nintendo has patents out the whazzang on that thing.

 

What did they change the PS3 controller to? The boomerang was fine.

 

I know sony had a thing on them for the dual shock design, and I believe that wasn't upheld, so my guess is the boomerang design was a backup plan in case they couldn't use the dual shock design..

Posted
Tilt sensor means nothing. It ain't the same.

 

I'm sure Nintendo has patents out the whazzang on that thing.

 

What did they change the PS3 controller to? The boomerang was fine.

 

 

I know it can never even come close to the same, the only things I can see that being useful for is vehicular control (racing, the warhawk game they showed which really wasn't following his motions that well.)

 

I'm just completely outraged they would even attempt it. It's the principle of the thing.

Posted

Tilt sensor means nothing. It ain't the same.

 

I'm sure Nintendo has patents out the whazzang on that thing.

 

What did they change the PS3 controller to? The boomerang was fine.

 

 

I know it can never even come close to the same, the only things I can see that being useful for is vehicular control (racing, the warhawk game they showed which really wasn't following his motions that well.)

 

I'm just completely outraged they would even attempt it. It's the principle of the thing.

 

Exactly, it is the principal.

 

Even though it is a "tilt-sensor", they totally half-assed it, and I don't see how they are going to be able to get that to work with their controller which already has a lot of buttons on it, whereas with the Wii, the gyroscoping is the only thing for it.

 

Also, that conference has nothing that interesting, so I can't justify dropping $600 for that.

Posted

So the shape, Dpad and buttons are identical to Dual shock 2? Good..very good. Boomerang would have been horrible to play Tekken on.

Posted
At first, I was just happy that they ditched the Boomerang design. This is really pissing me off to no end.

 

$500 and $600 dollars at launch. Fuck you, Sony.

 

Sony-Age just exploded. :P

 

The morons there acutally thought that it would come priced at $299.

 

And they're acutally going to "take inspiration" from Nintendo. LOL

 

Wow....The console Wars got alot more interesting in the West. :asshole2:

Posted
Have you played Tekken with it?

 

Even so, like that's a big deal to you, Ms. Arcade Dweller.

 

 

You can tell you wouldn't be able to play Tekken with it because of the handels. I wouldn't be able to hold it right.

 

 

Ms. arcade dweller still uses a dual shock to play on arcade.

Posted

So, how would one save gameplay progress on the $500 model?

 

I really couldn't care less about Wi-Fi, HDTV, or the hard drive in general.

Posted
Fuck Sony! They said something about being against gimmicks at their start of presentation then show off their half assed attempt at the wii-mote Dual Shock.

 

Newsflash: Sony lies. They lied about E3 not being when they'd announce the price, too.

Posted

Their online service is a ripoff of XBOX Live, their music service is a ripoff of Itunes and their tilting controller is a ripoff of an old PC controller. It's really funny how they pretend all of this is new and innovative.

Posted

So, how would one save gameplay progress on the $500 model?

 

PS3 uses memory sticks like PSP, not memory cards like PS1/PS2.

 

 

Actually, that's what I meant. If you look on that spreadsheet, it says "Memorystick/SD/CompactFlash", and that will only be available on the $600 model. So the only way to save anything on the $500 model is the harddrive, I guess.

 

The Wii has slots for those formats. At an estimated $200-250 dollars.

Posted
Sony will still dominate. :headbang:

 

 

Time will tell, but I sincerely doubt Sony will be "dominating" anything this time around. Didn't Sony fans say that the PSP was going to dominate the DS? I don't see that happening.

Posted

So, how would one save gameplay progress on the $500 model?

 

PS3 uses memory sticks like PSP, not memory cards like PS1/PS2.

 

So does that mean that the sticks will cost as much as they do for the PSP?

Posted

Are you sure? It was announced from like the very beginning that PS3 would use memory sticks, so that seems surprising.

 

I checked the spec sheet, and it seems the only place they are making a distinction between the 20 GB and 60 GB models are the right side in white. There, they definitely mention the HDMI, but on the left side they just list "I/O" for that.

 

I'm not sure you're reading the chart correctly, but I'll admit I find it a bit confusing myself.

 

EDIT: Okay, I see the "-" next to 20 GB. Okay, I don't know how to read a spec chart, so sue me.

 

So it appears that neither model supports PS1 memory cards or PS2 memory cards.

Posted
Are you sure? It was announced from like the very beginning that PS3 would use memory sticks, so that seems surprising.

 

I checked the spec sheet, and it seems the only place they are making a distinction between the 20 GB and 60 GB models are the right side in white. There, they definitely mention the HDMI, but on the left side they just list "I/O" for that.

 

I'm not sure you're reading the chart correctly, but I'll admit I find it a bit confusing myself.

 

 

I am 100% certain I am reading it correctly. If you look on the line where it says MemoryStick/SD/CompactFlash you will see a little white circle on the 60gig side of the divider. Everything that is standard has a circle in the middle with no divider.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...