Lightning Flik

This does not paint into good light the professional sport of hockey. The guy who co-ordinates the rules is taking "loans"?! Um, excuse me while I really question how the last playoffs went down now.

Um, Edwin. When did Clark turn heel? Did I miss it at some point? Edit: Why the fuck did I think King wrote the above message? Too much school work I swear.

Edit: Someday... Someday in the not that far off future, I shalt return and actually not be a fucking slack off at this. And maybe, just maybe... SWF will get a little cult fav OAOAST talent when I make that return. But that's for another time, and frankly when I'm feeling more into this.

I've got opening match, however there is a promo before it. Therefore, I don't need to do the opening credits and just go something like this: "MY HERA~! REVOLUTION ZERO WAS TOTALLY BAD ASS IN THAT LAST SEGMENT~!" "Cyclone... It just happened five minutes ago. It's not like we are some federation that has to hit it home with a replay thoroughout the show about what they said. If the people missed it, tough luck." And no, that isn't what I was going to use, just an example of what I meant.

MAIN EVENT SINGLES MATCH "The Superior One" Tom Flesher vs Toxxic (Special Guest Commentator: Janus) ~ Toxxic. As he owns this fed, heart and soul, right now. Janus better watch out. His title might not be his much longer. ICTV TITLE BOUT LANDON'S DISGRESSION STIP Landon "La Cucaracha" Maddix© vs Johnny Dangerous ~ Landon Maddix is a player and it is going to be his stipulation. He'll win for sure. (this will obviously come back to bite me in the ass) TAG TEAM TITLE BOUT 42nd Street©* (Todd Cortez & The Masked Man) vs Spike Jenkins & Sean Davis * = Not 'official' champions ~ Spike Jenkins and Sean Davis ... HA! I'm sorry, but you've got The Masked Man and Todd Cortez in a tag team match and frankly, there ain't going to be many that can beat them. SINGLES MATCH Ace Lezaire vs Dace Night ~ Dace F'N Night. Although, I like Ace. SUBMISSIONS MATCH Jamie Drazon vs Alan Clark ~ Should be Clark's match, however, Clark's in a heaping of trouble from his work, so I'm not sure. However, he did state he has the next two days off. Clark to win. FATAL FOUR WAY USJL TITLE #1 CONTENDERSHIP "The Icon" Max King vs Munich vs vs Manson vs Ced Ordonez ~ This should be an entertaining match up as the new #1 Contender for the Triple Crown Championship will be ... Ced Ordonez! Come on, what did you expect me to say? HARDCORE TITLE BOUT Ryan Dustin© vs Martin "Big Country" Hunt ~ Ryan Dustin SINGLES MATCH The Birdman vs Andrea Montgomery ~ Andrea SINGLES MATCH Edward James vs "The Corona" Vladimir Everheart ~ ... unexpected stuff always happens in the SWF. You'll see it here, with this match.

My revised stats to be up later today, mostly a reconfiguration of the moveset as I think I need to balance it out better. As for the card, nice job to Z for having to deal with the corner King wrote him in and making it look all nice. Great stuff.

Thanks for the smile Sly. Been a week since I've actually smiled for being happy. Needed that.

That isn't the reason why I'm absolutely furious Janus. Not by a fucking long shot. *snips out the long winded explanation, as I swore I wouldn't write out my life problems ever again and pin it as an excuse/reason* ...let's just say, I'm at my breaking point.

Sonuvabitch. I thought the show was tomorrow! I forgot what the hell today was. FUCK~! I just finished checking over what I needed to know for my project that I have to do tomorrow (it's worth 70% of the unit's mark), so I figured I'd take all night to work on the match and get it done for tomorrow. I take full blame for the Wayward Sons no-show. God damn my fucking pathetic soul. *absolutely livid right now with not just this, but this sent me off the edge*

CROSSFACE BY EUGENE!!!

When all my games are on the system and at the time was the only system I'd owned, therefore, buying a new one and losing my ol' games wasn't really an option. If it broke now, I'd just sell off my PS2 games and stock up some more on my GBA and GC.

WTF?! Edge used the ropes to win? BOOO!!!

The moment Edge went back to RAW.

As long as Story Mode isn't a single player, then I might credit it worth a damn.

...geez, me and Anya here bust our PS2s often, eh?

I'm lucky to say that I had one of the original PS2s (going by make that is), but I didn't get mine till later when it actually had games.

I'd just like to say that this time doesn't work for me as I'll won't be home till 8pm EST. However, if I'm the only person who has this problem, please do not reschedule the draft just for my sake. I'll just figure out some way to get around it (although, I really hate pre-ranking, oh well).

Well this is interesting. March 2005 in Japan is when Sony says it'll be released? Interesting info. If it is released before E3, we should be able to hear the cries of either joy or outrage from Japan on how the system is.

...hopefully, the Jokers don't suck this year.

Before I leave as my break is now over, I'll just say thanks for the clarification on that King.

I'd say 2005 Christmas just because they want the profits of everyone trying to get the system.

When it has to BORROW from the Smackdown series, then yes. It would likely seem that way indeed. This game doesn't seem that great at all. Story mode will be a hit or a miss depending on how well they do with the "story" aspect, because if it is just your CAW working his way up, it'll suck pretty bad.

Rando, the stipulation is that we have to win the match to get the tag team titles shot. So I don't think we'll be getting the shot at the titles since we'll probably be losing to Janus. And most likely, Janus will drop Eddy, head first into like the concrete or something. And why apologize for my bad writing that they'll have to put up with? *shrugs* Not like you are the one to blame for my bad writing style.

You are wrong that he'll get 5 points off of return yards. 947 yards divide by 20 yards to a point = 47.35 points. Now divide that by 17 weeks = 2.79 point average per week via return yardage. Let's compare that with say a WR that's got roughly the same stats via yardage. Chris Chambers with 967 yards divide by 10 yards to a point = 96.7 points. Now divide that by 17 weeks = 5.69 points. An RB with the roughly same stats via yardage. R. Johnson with 957 yards divided by 10 yards per point = 95.7 points. Divided by 17 Weeks = 5.63 points. I'll take Bledsoe as he currently has the lowest ranking points among QBs while being above 2000 Passing yards. 2860 yards divided by 25 yards per point = 114.4 points. Divided by 17 Weeks = 6.72 points. In the cases above, Smart falls double behind in points getting compared to the rest. In the case of Bledsoe, he's almost triple. Now then, the average return yardage by the top 50 returners is 757.54 yards. That's an average of 37.89 points a season and total of 2.23 a week. Compare to the top 50 Receiving Yards. Average = 916.58 yards. Average/Season = 91.67 points. Average/17Weeks = 5.39 points per week. Compare to the top 50 Running Yards. Average = 840.06 yards. Average/Season = 84.00 points. Average/17Weeks = 4.94 points per week. Compare to the top 30 Passing Yards (only way to fairly compare because only 30 QBs can legitmately start). Average = 2839.43 yards. Average/Season = 113.58 points. Average/17Weeks = 6.68 points per week. Now then, going by this, we see that returners are only making a third of what the other categories make, just by straight up yardage points. Which is where your concern lies. They simply don't make that much unless they are Dante Hall. And I checked to see who gets 5 points and only Dante breaks the 5 point mark. Only 3 players break 4 points. Hell, only 12 players make over 3 points. Sorry Raza. Request for point system change is denied on your basis of returners getting a decent share of points. They simply don't in comparison to the rest of the categories that matter.

I'm so sorry people, but while talking with HarleyQuinn about the upcoming draft and the stats and shit, I realized I made a huge error. This is for QBs, RBs, and WRs: Sacks are only supposed to be -1 and not a -2 like it currently is. Fumbles are supposed to be a -2 and not a -1. I got the two mixed up! I'm so sorry! I didn't even realize it till HarleyQuinn pointed out how that was a little odd that sacks were more costly than fumbles. Again, I'm terribly sorry for any anguish I cause for your drafting results.