Mr. S£im Citrus

Slow down, hoss; I passed sixteen a long time ago and, given a choice between the Steiners and the Busters, I'm picking the Busters. I feel as though Tully and Arn were just as good a team as Rick and Scott, and they didn't have to work stiff in order to get over. Besides, I personally give more weight to the fact that the Busters wrestled in both the WWF and NWA during the peak of their tag team depth, whereas, by the time the Steiners got to the WWF, the tag division was beginning the process of dying a slow death.

Brainbusters Hollywood Blonds Funks Hart Foundation

Mircale Violence Connection > Road Warriors > New Age Outlaws Midnight Express > Hardy Boyz > Outsiders

No shit; I was under the impression that this was only supposed to be the "nomination" thread. By the time I'd caught on that the tournament had already started, I'd already missed five days of voting! Anyway: Brainbusters > Steiners > Eliminators

What "mess" would you be referring to? I was out to sea when Blade 3 came out, and my internet access wasn't reliable enough for me to waste time reading reviews of movies that I wasn't likely to see.

You know, Power Pack was my favorite title as a kid (I have virtually the whole series), but I REALLY can't see it translating into a movie. New Warriors might actually be a better story, when you think about how the team was originally formed. I wouldn't mind seeing a Blank Panther movie, either.

.... What? Who the hell is that addressed to, anyway?

44) Justice and Rule t-shirts.

I meant more along the lines of, "randomly pumping out a promo every now and then, even though everybody knows that he's gone, and ain't comin' back." I'd draw a parallel to the "Adventures of Al Wilson" stuff that DEAN RASSMUSSEN used to do in the Smackdown threads after they killed the Al Wilson character... like I said, IL might be better for the role. The Mis-Adventures of IL's Disembodied Soul... now THERE be ratings!

“It… was… a… screwjob!” 32) Danny Williams Strong Style Ribs

First off, for the record, I was using “you” in the general sense, not “you” as in “the TSM poster called CanadianChick.” Just wanted to clear up any potential confusion. And I’m not arguing for pity here. Whether you feel sorry for the guy is not the issue. I’m saying that integrity has to come into play somewhere. At the point in your relationship where you feel justified in cheating on your significant other, you need to cut your losses and split; cheating on someone when you could have broken up and moved on to someone else is just plain malicious. I can appreciate the karma in someone who is an accomplice to one person cheating on their SO being cheated on down the line, but that still doesn’t make it okay. Some people have very forgiving hearts. That does not, by any stretch, mean that they deserve to be cheated on. My grandfather cheated on my grandmother; she took him back, and they remained married for another thirty years until his death. My father and all my aunts and uncles were grown, so it’s not like they were staying together for the children, or anything. But my grandmother definitely didn’t deserve to be cheated on, and I’ll have words with anyone who says otherwise. I have to, at this point, accept that there is some sort of cultural gap between you and I, as I am simply incapable of comprehending the lack of moral relativity it takes to be able to rationalize cheating on someone, particularly someone that you've had a committed long-term relationship with.

Because he'd be an idiot to get back together with a girl who cheated on him with his best friend. Fool me once, shame on you.... Bullshit. Like the old cliché goes, you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink; I can give you every reason in the world to cheat, but I can’t make you sleep with somebody else. If you don’t have enough respect for the relationship between you and your significant other to remain faithful, then kick him to the curb, or trade up, or whatever… But it’s NEVER okay to cheat. Your SO being gullible and/or a pussy doesn’t make cheating on them justifiable, and anyone who says otherwise is an incorrigible cynic and/or fucked in the head.

17. Finishers are sold (by everybody but Silent)

"Zombie" Tupac, I guess... Although, I suppose it would be better if IL did it.

Why Drea, I never thought of you as either bitter or old... 8. Clusterfuck (a PITA to write, but always a great read).

3) Written matches kick RP's ass, and take their lunch money. 4) Kingmas.

This site is outstanding; I have duty today (lucky me), and I got saddled with a twelve-hour desk watch, so I've been reading this site off and on all day, and they have some of the most interesting discussions I've ever seen on a message board... Hell, somebody asked whether any living creatures could evolve wheels, and got serious - and intelligent - answers. I couldn't even imagine what kind of answers a question like that would get on this board...

I don't understand this line of reasoning at all; maybe there's some sort of cultural gap at play here, or something but, to my way of thinking, the one - and only - circumstance in which that you can reasonably claim that one person "deserves" to get cheated on is if they cheated on their partner first.

Well... to the best of my recollection, I've only been booked on Lockdown once since it became "family friendly." And that was just lazy writing on my part; I will endeavor not to be that sloppy in the future.

I dunno, I could see Bo as the Tupac of the SWF...

You're probably right, JJJ. And, oh yeah Landon, bitter at who, by the way? If we weren't booked for any title defenses, why the hell are you mad at us? We certainly didn't reject or refuse any title defenses; in fact, I only told CC that there'd be about a two-week period that I wasn't able to write and, quite honestly, a few more defenses would probably have been better for our angle... In fact, after you and Todd split, and Munich's disappearance meant the end of the Manson/Griffon team, I don't recall that there was any team for us to defend against in the first place, so what is your beef, exactly? That CC didn't manufacture a random team for us to defend against?

That is the most annoying thing about WWE commentators. They constantly feel the need to review the points of a story line while the match is going on in the ring instead of simply calling the action. That, or spewing a bunch of cliches and wrestler nicknames. That's the main reason why I've always felt that Monsoon and Ventura were the greatest commentary team in the WWF. Although, in the thread I created in General a few months ago, people made the argument that Monsoon/Heenan had better chemistry/banter, Ventura/Monsoon (and, later, Ventura/Ross in WCW) were two of the best-ever commentary teams in terms of calling the action, and actually attempting to put the talent competing in the match over, rather than going off on a tangent about whatever the "Flavor of the Month" was. EDIT - Did I say a few months ago? I meant a year...

Out of curiosity, Edwin, how often does that happen to you? I ask because, aside from the weekends, when I have custody of my son, I don't have occasion to cook for anyone; and I can't imagine, at my age, inviting a half-dozen or more people over to my house to stay overnight, and then cook for them in the morning...

DDW?

:: shrugs :: Retarded or not, the FCC seems to agree, at least as far as G*d-damn goes.