Damaramu 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Ok...I don't even need to say anything...HOW WAS THAT GOOD FOR BUSINESS AT ALL!? Shane f'n McMahon just beat Kane up...FAIR AND SQUARE. You could say the first time he beat him down..."oh he suprised him..." and then with the dumpster..."Well it was a cheap shot..." Well defend this bullshit! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Ok...I don't even need to say anything...HOW WAS THAT GOOD FOR BUSINESS AT ALL!? Shane f'n McMahon just beat Kane up...FAIR AND SQUARE. You could say the first time he beat him down..."oh he suprised him..." and then with the dumpster..."Well it was a cheap shot..." Well defend this bullshit! Shane wasn't the one who booked the angle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Yes, but Shane should have the power to say, Fuck this, this is lame. I mean Vince is his dad, not like he would fire Shane if he refused to put over Kane. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Yes, but Shane should have the power to say, Fuck this, this is lame. I mean Vince is his dad, not like he would fire Shane if he refused to put over Kane. Not if it was HHH's idea, in order to make sure Kane doesn't get too popular. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Besides, you'll find very few people that refused to be put over. Shane isn't my favourite either, but he's better than the other McMahons. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
razazteca 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 I only want to see Shane as a manager. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Old Me Report post Posted September 16, 2003 The argument for Shane is that at least he goes the fuck away, for long periods of time between his appearances, and is not as boring and BLAH as Linda. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HollywoodSpikeJenkins 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 He's willing to do insane spots in the 2 matches a year he gets booked in, which is a lot better then Vince or Steph every month. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Real Nosferatu Report post Posted September 16, 2003 I see it like this. Kane murders Shane at Unforgiven. that's all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
razazteca 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Test is a lesser evil than HHH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Old Me Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Test is a lesser evil than HHH. Okay, what's your point? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
razazteca 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Test is not ruining the main event but only the midcard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Old Me Report post Posted September 16, 2003 He's hardly even mid card anymore. Would you want Shane to manage him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Real Nosferatu Report post Posted September 16, 2003 He's hardly even mid card anymore. Would you want Shane to manage him? Would that be Test Push #431 or current push add on #32 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
razazteca 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Anything is better than the year long angle over Stacy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Old Me Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Anything is better than the year long angle over Stacy. This is true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
razazteca 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Shane could of at least managed Test to the tag championship. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MarvinisaLunatic 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Eh. Id rather have Shane than Vince or Stephanie wrestling. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RavishingRickRudo 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Yeah, cause at least Shane doesn't bury talent with his... act...ions... err... BOYWONDERROOOOLZ!~ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Shane's the good McMahon because he knows when it's time to leave. If he's still around by Survivor Series, I shall change my tune. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheGame2705 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 I personally can't remember when Vince got the one up on a full time wrestler who was fully capacitated. I like him the most out of all the McMahons as far as an onscreen character goes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
notJames 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Shane's the good McMahon because he knows when it's time to leave... He should have left a long time ago. The wrestling ring is for wrestlers, not stunt monkeys who just happen to have blood ties to the boss. This whole "feud" with Kane is pointless. What does it say about Kane when he beats Shane, someone who doesn't wrestle? Oooh... maybe he'll go after Terri. Or a stage hand. Or maybe he'll torch JR again. That first time sure did wonders for his career, didn't it? RAW is officially off my radar screen. Praise Lurline for Monday Night Football. Have fun spin doctoring the PPV. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 In Shane's defense, he is very nice to the fans. *has his pic of himself and Shane hung up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jester 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 I think the fact that Shane disappears for a few months at a time makes this whole situation worse, not better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Old Me Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Shane can bring it!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
notJames 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 Shane can jump from high places! Feh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 You Can't defend it....Shane wanted some spotlight so he will take down Kane during his Monster like push in the headline match. Might not be main event but the Unforgiven posters basically Identify Kane in it . so Kane loses in a Last Man standing match to Shane... oye I can taste the bile now. or maybe this is Shane's exit and Kane just beats him....But he will have to Beat him BARELY because you know Shane might not be a wrestler...but he is a Bah Gawd McMahon! oye makes me wish they go back to the supernatural bullshit again Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haVoc 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 bLeH. Kane will win Sunday and then be set up as the first (and probably only) monster heel for Goldberg to feud with until Triple H returns. Triple H may be taking a month off but Raw isn't about to get any better any time soon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Adrian 3:16 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 I seriously have to question the logic of anyone who finds entertainment value in Shane living out his fantasies in the ring every week. I've said it before and I'll say it again: of the 4 McMahons Shane is the absolute WORST. Vince: I know its part of some "smark mantra" to have legitimate hate for Vince, but fuck that. I've always found his heel character to be entertaining. And at least in the Austin/Vince feud you didn't see Vince fighting Austin 50/50 (or even better). He hid behind his legions of goons and would get murdered whenever they went one and one, not taking him to his limit in last man standing matches. Steph: Okay, she's pretty annoying too, but at least she's easier on the eyes than Shane. Linda: Possibly the most boring human being on the planet, but still basically harmless. She'll come out once in a blue moon, put us all to sleep with some big announcement, and disappear. Shane: No redeeming qualities whatsoever. If you really think Kane will squash Shane at Unforgiven you have a lot more faith in them than I do. Shane will give Kane the fight of his life, because he's the plucky McMahon kid bah gawd. Rob Van Who? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crimson Platypus 0 Report post Posted September 16, 2003 I seriously have to question the logic of anyone who finds entertainment value in Shane living out his fantasies in the ring every week. I've said it before and I'll say it again: of the 4 McMahons Shane is the absolute WORST. Vince: I know its part of some "smark mantra" to have legitimate hate for Vince, but fuck that. I've always found his heel character to be entertaining. And at least in the Austin/Vince feud you didn't see Vince fighting Austin 50/50 (or even better). He hid behind his legions of goons and would get murdered whenever they went one and one, not taking him to his limit in last man standing matches. Steph: Okay, she's pretty annoying too, but at least she's easier on the eyes than Shane. Linda: Possibly the most boring human being on the planet, but still basically harmless. She'll come out once in a blue moon, put us all to sleep with some big announcement, and disappear. Shane: No redeeming qualities whatsoever. If you really think Kane will squash Shane at Unforgiven you have a lot more faith in them than I do. Shane will give Kane the fight of his life, because he's the plucky McMahon kid bah gawd. Rob Van Who? I agree 100%. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites