MarvinisaLunatic Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 Like it wasnt expected, the Yankees are killing the Twins 6-0
Guest Anglesault Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 So much for Mr. "I'll beat the Yankees Twice", huh?
Bruiser Chong Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 Ok, I think the biggest mystery of the playoffs just became just how David "Haystack" Wells landed a wife like that. Well, obviously millions of dollars didn't hurt, but still. Wow.
JangoFett4Hire Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 Twins 6 outs away from the end of their season...
MarvinisaLunatic Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 Whichever team wins tomorrow, Sox or As, is screwed because they have to make the flight back to Oakland, and then fly back to NY for the game vs NY on wednesday. Thats a lot of traveling even with the 1 day off.
JangoFett4Hire Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 It would be Wednesday, 10/8 at 8pm...
MarvinisaLunatic Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 Yeah..and I just realized..Fox seems to have a problem..Marlins at Cubs/Braves winner game 2 is also at 8:20 on Wednesday...
JangoFett4Hire Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 According to the media guide, FX will also televise games...
MarvinisaLunatic Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 According to the media guide, FX will also televise games... FX huh. Id like to see the ratings for the game that gets put on FX (probably the NLCS game).
Slayer Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 Ok, I think the biggest mystery of the playoffs just became just how David "Haystack" Wells landed a wife like that. Well, obviously millions of dollars didn't hurt, but still. Wow. He got her because he's fat
JangoFett4Hire Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 Yeah. Wednesday will be the only time Fox/FX has a conflict, as they will do double headers on the 11th and 12th...
The Ghost of bps21 Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 Steinbrenner looked almost upset that the Yankees won. I think he really wanted to fire somebody this year
Guest Anglesault Posted October 5, 2003 Report Posted October 5, 2003 Steinbrenner looked almost upset that the Yankees won. I think he really wanted to fire somebody this year He looked content, but not happy.
Guest Salacious Crumb Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 I think he's seriously worried about the possibility of having to play either the A's or the Sox.
Guest Anglesault Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 He looked miserable. No, that was his "almost happy" face. His miserable face is much angrier looking, while his happy face looks like anyone else's indifferent face.
Guest Salacious Crumb Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 I half expect to see him just drop dead at one of these games.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 The A's remind me of the Phillies and Royals teams of the late 70s. Both teams won their divisions for three straight years, but kept getting beat in the championship series every damned time. If there's a silver lining, its that both teams finally broke through in 1980.
Bored Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 The A's remind me of the Phillies and Royals teams of the late 70s. Both teams won their divisions for three straight years, but kept getting beat in the championship series every damned time. If there's a silver lining, its that both teams finally broke through in 1980. Great I can look forward to 2010. Its just so hard because its not like they are overmatched in any these past four years and could have won every series but they don't have any killer instinct. Of course these last two game's have ranked up there with Game 3 of 2001 and I thought nothing would come close to that. With everything that has happened it'll be a minor miracle if they win tommorrow. If they win I won't even care what they do in the ALCS as I'll just be thrilled they got there.
KingPK Posted October 6, 2003 Author Report Posted October 6, 2003 Whichever team wins tomorrow, Sox or As, is screwed because they have to make the flight back to Oakland, and then fly back to NY for the game vs NY on wednesday. Thats a lot of traveling even with the 1 day off. That royally pissed me off. The Sox and A's will have played essentially 5 games in 6 days with TWO instances where they played extras in a night game and then had to play a 1PM game the next day. On the flip side, the Yankees and Twins had a day off between Games 1 + 2 and an extra travel day to go to Minnesota. Thank you Fox. Red Sox and A's fans alike would like to give you the ol' BK Salute.
Cartman Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 Whichever team wins tomorrow, Sox or As, is screwed because they have to make the flight back to Oakland, and then fly back to NY for the game vs NY on wednesday. Thats a lot of traveling even with the 1 day off. That royally pissed me off. The Sox and A's will have played essentially 5 games in 6 days with TWO instances where they played extras in a night game and then had to play a 1PM game the next day. On the flip side, the Yankees and Twins had a day off between Games 1 + 2 and an extra travel day to go to Minnesota. Thank you Fox. Red Sox and A's fans alike would like to give you the ol' BK Salute. Amen! I believe tomorrow's game is at 8pm....that will be like a whole day off for these teams(even with the travel lol.
The Ghost of bps21 Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 GO CUBS!!! Now if they can hold on, and the Sox can win tomorrow... I'll have the final 4 that I wanted!!!
Guest Smues Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 ..............................every year, every year this happens. Every year.....................every single year..........Luckily I lives near a rather steep cliff. Hmm to drive off or just jump.
Bruiser Chong Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 What a SHITTY call right there. Yeah, they only got one run and Wood got out of it, but Lofton clearly caught the ball and that should have been a triple play. Cubs fan, Braves fan, or neutral viewer, you cannot deny that. The Braves just made five outs in that inning and that pissant Giles is complaining. I could admit if Lofton hadn't caught it and it had been close, but that was such a terrible call. Hopefully, that doesn't factor into things.
NoCalMike Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 fucking A's need to to do something tomorrow. I am tired of this shit in the divisional series. This is the second time in 3 years they have been fucked over in a game that has turned the tide for the other team in the series. First it was Giambi getting called Out when he was obviously safe if you look at the replay, but his stupid ass didn't slide which made it a close call. Then Tejada stops on the basepath and gets called out when obviously he should have been awarded the base regardless, however he makes the call close by not finishing a play where the throw to home was so offline, he could have trotted home, but he STOPPED..... ARRRRGHH DAMMIT.
MrRant Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 I hate the Red Sox.... but it would make me feel so good to watch them beat the A's.
Bruiser Chong Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 I know I'm carrying it out a bit too far, but I must ask, why do we have six umpires out there? To get six wrong decisions on plays like that? You can call me biased for being a Cubs fan, but that still is bothering me because instead of Wood pitching a deserved shutout, he's pitching in a three-run game. Not to mentioned he had to tack on a few more pitches because of the bad call. Maybe I'm out of the loop, but I must ask, why not use an instant replay in baseball? Is it because it's not "traditional" or something? Because I think that a lot of crap is going by because of no instant replay. It's time like this that I begin to think elements of these games are fixed.
NoCalMike Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 I have a question. Can baseball "judgement" calls be overturned by another umpire.....(not counting whether a batter swung or not).
sfaJack Posted October 6, 2003 Report Posted October 6, 2003 I know I'm carrying it out a bit too far, but I must ask, why do we have six umpires out there? To get six wrong decisions on plays like that? You can call me biased for being a Cubs fan, but that still is bothering me because instead of Wood pitching a deserved shutout, he's pitching in a three-run game. Not to mentioned he had to tack on a few more pitches because of the bad call. Maybe I'm out of the loop, but I must ask, why not use an instant replay in baseball? Is it because it's not "traditional" or something? Because I think that a lot of crap is going by because of no instant replay. It's time like this that I begin to think elements of these games are fixed. Bruiser, you aren't making too much out of it. It WAS a horseshit call, and Giles is a whiny little bitch for arguing about it. I hope he gets up again against Wood so Kerry can give him a 97 MPH heater in his earhole. That would make up for his bitching about a play he clearly fucked up on, and for Fick's dirty, cheap shot last night. The Cubs are holding on so far, but if this game ends up tied at some point, with that fake Furcal run being the difference, I'm going to have someone do some very bad things to these umpires. What a travesty.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now