Giuseppe Zangara Posted May 25, 2004 Report Posted May 25, 2004 Just who the hell are you? What an awful, terrible, pitiful response.
Guest MikeSC Posted May 25, 2004 Report Posted May 25, 2004 Just who the hell are you? What an awful, terrible, pitiful response. Sadly, also an honest question. One who's answer is of little importance, admittedly, but still quite the baffler. -=Mike
Red Hot Thumbtack In The Eye Posted May 25, 2004 Report Posted May 25, 2004 This could be just the thing that Inca needs to get back into form.
Guest Flyboy Posted May 25, 2004 Report Posted May 25, 2004 When I saw the topic of this thread, I thought it was referring to Vader. I want my money back.
Guest INXS Posted May 25, 2004 Report Posted May 25, 2004 From what I have noticed, the biggest moron in the CE folder is The Mike SC. Hunger4Unger shouldn't have been banned, yeah, he was crazy but when you think about it, did he actually do anything to justify a ban? Banning Hunger surely means that his exact opposite, Mike, should also be banned. This thread is pointless.
Slayer Posted May 25, 2004 Report Posted May 25, 2004 I'm disappointed by the lack of "yo momma" jokes in this thread
Guest Agent of Oblivion Posted May 25, 2004 Report Posted May 25, 2004 From what I have noticed, the biggest moron in the CE folder is The Mike SC. Hunger4Unger shouldn't have been banned, yeah, he was crazy but when you think about it, did he actually do anything to justify a ban? Banning Hunger surely means that his exact opposite, Mike, should also be banned. This thread is pointless. Mike is equally as irritating as Unger was, only Unger was a little less than half as bright. That's why he's not here anymore. Guy never had anything to back up his "opinions."
Guest Cerebus Posted May 25, 2004 Report Posted May 25, 2004 I'm disappointed by the lack of "yo momma" jokes in this thread SLAYER, YO' MOMMA SUCKS SO MUCH DICK SHE COULD SELL HER SPIT TO A SPERM BANK~!!!!!1 ROTFLMAOLOLOLOLOLOLOL~!!!!!!
Ripper Posted May 25, 2004 Report Posted May 25, 2004 YO MAMMA SO FAT...that...well...that her calorie intake must be astronomical....
Guest MikeSC Posted May 25, 2004 Report Posted May 25, 2004 From what I have noticed, the biggest moron in the CE folder is The Mike SC. Hunger4Unger shouldn't have been banned, yeah, he was crazy but when you think about it, did he actually do anything to justify a ban? Banning Hunger surely means that his exact opposite, Mike, should also be banned. This thread is pointless. Sad that your best contribution to the board is that you seldom are here. -=Mike
Guest INXS Posted May 25, 2004 Report Posted May 25, 2004 So by rarely posting here means that my opinions are less valid? I have been observing with an open view on things. To AOO: I didn't think that posting sources to back up opinions was required here. I don't agree with a hell of a lot of what he posted but surely we have to take the rough with the smooth and as long as he was obeying the rules of the board he should have been allowed to continue to post.
kkktookmybabyaway Posted May 25, 2004 Report Posted May 25, 2004 Like I said before, I liked ol' h4u. I still don't understand why he got the boot, but whatever...
Slayer Posted May 25, 2004 Report Posted May 25, 2004 So by rarely posting here means that my opinions are less valid? Yeah really... By that argument, Mike should be renamed to "Eagan4SC"
Guest pinnacleofallthingsmanly Posted May 26, 2004 Report Posted May 26, 2004 This thread is so fucking childish and stupid.
Guest MikeSC Posted May 26, 2004 Report Posted May 26, 2004 So by rarely posting here means that my opinions are less valid? Yeah really... By that argument, Mike should be renamed to "Eagan4SC" Wow, that was Anglesaultian in its utter irrelevance. Bravo! So by rarely posting here means that my opinions are less valid? I have been observing with an open view on things. No, your opinions are invalid regardless of how much you post. Your lack of posts simply minimizes that. -=Mike
Guest INXS Posted May 26, 2004 Report Posted May 26, 2004 So as I said, lack of posts must equate to lack of weight in opinion.
Guest MikeSC Posted May 26, 2004 Report Posted May 26, 2004 So as I said, lack of posts must equate to lack of weight in opinion. No. Your opinions would still have no weight if you had ten times as many posts. After all, "0" (the substance of your posts) multiplied by x will always end up as "0". It'd just be a more noticeable dilemma. -=Mike
Your Paragon of Virtue Posted May 26, 2004 Report Posted May 26, 2004 So by rarely posting here means that my opinions are less valid? Yeah really... By that argument, Mike should be renamed to "Eagan4SC" Wow, that was Anglesaultian in its utter irrelevance. Bravo! Dissent in the Republican party? Hardcore white-washed conservatives collide, TONIGHT~!
Guest MikeSC Posted May 26, 2004 Report Posted May 26, 2004 So by rarely posting here means that my opinions are less valid? Yeah really... By that argument, Mike should be renamed to "Eagan4SC" Wow, that was Anglesaultian in its utter irrelevance. Bravo! Dissent in the Republican party? Hardcore white-washed conservatives collide, TONIGHT~! I'd totally own him. -=Mike
Slayer Posted May 26, 2004 Report Posted May 26, 2004 So in one night I got compared to Anglesault AND called a Republican? Bitches need to step off
Guest MikeSC Posted May 26, 2004 Report Posted May 26, 2004 So in one night I got compared to Anglesault AND called a Republican? Bitches need to step off You know you love the attention. -=Mike
Your Paragon of Virtue Posted May 26, 2004 Report Posted May 26, 2004 So in one night I got compared to Anglesault AND called a Republican? Bitches need to step off I was talking about Anglesault and A Mike SC. Your quoted post was Anglesaultian in its utter irrelevance.
Slayer Posted May 26, 2004 Report Posted May 26, 2004 Almost everytime now when I see a post from MikeSC, I'm reminded of this bit from a particular classic thread here at TSM cheer I WIN I WIN I'M SO MATURE YAY FOR ME and then stick your fingers in your ears while trying to hum louder than everyone giggling at you behind cupped hands. Face it. As this thread (among others) demonstrates, you are viewed as a joke. Now given your predictability, I imagine your response to such a statement would be to just turn around and say "OMFG you're a worse joke than me PWNED~!@!", however, I can admit I am a joke, but I think I've demonstrated for the most part that I don't take message board shit seriously. Certainly can't say the same for anything I've seen from you. That's all I have to say. There will be no response. Good day.
Slayer Posted May 26, 2004 Report Posted May 26, 2004 So in one night I got compared to Anglesault AND called a Republican? Bitches need to step off I was talking about Anglesault and A Mike SC. Your quoted post was Anglesaultian in its utter irrelevance. You suck
Your Paragon of Virtue Posted May 26, 2004 Report Posted May 26, 2004 So in one night I got compared to Anglesault AND called a Republican? Bitches need to step off I was talking about Anglesault and A Mike SC. Your quoted post was Anglesaultian in its utter irrelevance. You suck DIK ALL NIT LAWNG TIL DA BREAK A DAWN LIK HAWT BUTTAED POPCAWN~! i mean oh shit
Guest Agent of Oblivion Posted May 26, 2004 Report Posted May 26, 2004 To AOO: I didn't think that posting sources to back up opinions was required here. I don't agree with a hell of a lot of what he posted but surely we have to take the rough with the smooth and as long as he was obeying the rules of the board he should have been allowed to continue to post. It's required if you want to be taken seriously at all. Unger just spouted off conspiracy bullshit that I basically interpreted to be trolling, since they were so fucking outlandish and stupid. If there were even a fraction of credence to what he was talking about, he was more than welcome to post some sources, or at least adhere to the laws of common sense. When his knee-jerk post reaction to the Berg beheading was "Oh my god, those hooded islamic terrorists look like AMERICANS. AMERICA killed Nick Berg." Without ANYTHING to reinforce his argument, that's trolling. Having a differing opinion will not get anyone banned. Mike and Marney are both still here, and so are Tyler and Jobber..I don't agree with any of those four on most subjects, and I'm still here. Your opinion on "stuff" is likely different, and you're still here. Unger was a fuckin' troll, who came back after he was banned to still troll. Fuck a bunch of him.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now