KingPK Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 This week begins the 8th (its been that many already?) year of Interleague Play. The AL East plays the NL West, AL Central plays the NL East, and the AL West plays the NL Central. I know people have differing opinions about the matter, so let's make it our Topic of the Off-Day: Do you like/dislike interleague, and why?
Guest FrigidSoul Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 I demand this thread be closed for 19 more minutes as it isn't even Monday on the East Coast yet. You jumped the button King...hang your head in shame. Oh, and I hate InterLeague play. All teams should face the same amount of teams that the other teams in their own division face. It also shows previews of potential World Series match-ups and I don't like that. I want both teams going into the World Series not knowing a thing about the other.
Bored Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 I like the "natural rivals" but beyond that they need to junk it. As long as both leagues have different rules (DH) these interleague match-ups are inherently unfair. I'm going to Friday night's game between the A's and Pirates, on Spider-Man 2 night no less. Oh well at least I get to see Craig Wilson play in person for the first time.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 I dislike interleague play, as it really fucks with the schedule, as teams play drastically different schedules. If the schedule was balanced, I'd be ok with it.
Guest Anglesault Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 Someone fucked up REALLY bad with this interleague play (And, for that matter, the last AL East-NL West) Let's be brutally honest. No one wants to see Yankees/Rockies-Diamondbacks-Padres. Yankees/Dodgers-Giants is still a bit of an extra draw, especially in NY, and for the second time, we lose one of those series. I would love to go see back to back yankees/Dodgers and yankees/Giants at the Stadium. Instead, I get the Padres and Rockies and the Yankees/Dodgers in LA
The Czech Republic Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 I'm stoked for the Cubs against the Seattle Mariners. This time, it's personal?
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 Maddux vs. Moyer, age in the cage? Yeah, that's probably lame. On the plus side, the new column is up.
Guest Choken One Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 I wouldn't mind if they set aside 6 games a year for every team to play 3 games each against two "rivals" from the other side. THATS it! No more unneccesary Rockies/D-Rays games please.
Hektik Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 Let's be brutally honest. No one wants to see Yankees/Rockies-Diamondbacks-Padres. Whats the matter, you don't want to see them play a good team like the Padres. But your right, the Padres and the Yankees don't have much of a history except that they faced each other in the World Series. Hey, David Wells will be pitching against the Yankees on Sunday so there might be something for you there.
Guest Anglesault Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 Let's be brutally honest. No one wants to see Yankees/Rockies-Diamondbacks-Padres. Whats the matter, you don't want to see them play a good team like the Padres. But your right, the Padres and the Yankees don't have much of a history except that they faced each other in the World Series. Hey, David Wells will be pitching against the Yankees on Sunday so there might be something for you there. I might go just to see Boomer.
NoCalMike Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 I was at the Rivercats game today, (The A's AAA team). I got sunburned all to hell. At least they kept the updates going on the A's game. The A's offense has really stepped it up with the absence of Chavez. I hope they can keep it up for another few weeks Meanwhile Mulder & Hudson are starting to turn it on, Zito & Harden are getting better finally, and Redman, well he is the wilcard, but as a #5 starter, I will take him.
Bruiser Chong Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 I liked Interleague play when they first did it, just because it was something new, but it's become painfully obvious that it's just flawed. Aside from match-ups like New York vs. New York, Chicago vs. Chicago, etc., the games are pointless and feel like pre-season. The Cubs are one of the few teams not playing interleague games the first part of the week, as they play a four-game set against the red-hot Cards. Not the best time to play them, considering the Cubs' problems as of late, but Pujols will probably miss most of, if not all of the series because of the injury he suffered today. Good news for the Cubbies, as he's just starting to turn it up.
The Czech Republic Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 Yeah this is a huge series for St. Louis and the Cubs. We need it more than they do though. I agree that Interleague is worthless unless it's a cross-town matchup or relocation-related like the Yankees against the Dodgers or the Giants, or A's/Phillies, Red Sox/Braves, Mariners/Brewers(obscure~!), Cardinals/Orioles. But nobody wants to see the Rockies against the Blue Jays.
Dr. Tom Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 I've never been a fan of interleague play. For exhibition games and the World Series, it's fine, but it just doesn't feel right during the regular season. I'd rather see teams play against other clubs in their division and league, since those are the ones (division especially) that mean more.
Vern Gagne Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 I'm a fan. It's still brings a different feel when interleague play occurs, and it's still unique seeing your team host a NL team, or visit an NL team.
Bruiser Chong Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 Like I said, I've been more receptive to it in years past, but most of these matchups this year are horrible. Montreal and Seattle? Houston and Seattle? Atlanta and Detroit? Who the hell thought anyone wanted to see these?
Vern Gagne Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 Like I said, I've been more receptive to it in years past, but most of these matchups this year are horrible. Montreal and Seattle? Houston and Seattle? Atlanta and Detroit? Who the hell thought anyone wanted to see these? Who wants to see Montreal play anyone, or Houston play Pittsburgh, or Detroit play Minnesota? The fact is most matchups don't draw jack in terms of interests.
Guest Salacious Crumb Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 ESPN really needs to shake up what baseball games they put on. They'll have had 5 or 6 Cubs/Cards games on after this week and the seasons only 2 months old. I'm really getting sick of seeing the Yankees, Red Sox, Angels, O's, Cubs, Astros, Cards and Giants. There are other teams in the league. I know I've ranted about that more than once but it's starting to get really annoying. As far as Interleague. Outside of seeing Cincy destroy Cleveland I'm pretty apathetic. The A's will probably be a boring series but Texas might make for some fun games.
Bruiser Chong Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 Like I said, I've been more receptive to it in years past, but most of these matchups this year are horrible. Montreal and Seattle? Houston and Seattle? Atlanta and Detroit? Who the hell thought anyone wanted to see these? Who wants to see Montreal play anyone, or Houston play Pittsburgh, or Detroit play Minnesota? The fact is most matchups don't draw jack in terms of interests. Those games at least have an impact on the team's respective division. Every game counts, but more damage can be done when you're playing within your own division. ESPN really needs to shake up what baseball games they put on. They'll have had 5 or 6 Cubs/Cards games on after this week and the seasons only 2 months old. Um, which game would you like them to show instead? The Giants versus the last place Rockies or the Rangers versus the last place Pirates? Aside from Chicago and St. Louis, the games today are crap. I'm really getting sick of seeing the Yankees, Red Sox, Angels, O's, Cubs, Astros, Cards and Giants. They're called ratings. The teams you mentioned have the biggest followings of all of the teams in MLB. They're not concerned with appeasing EVERY fan of EVERY team. The Cubs and Cards is a classic rivalry that draws fans and ratings. They aren't going to pass up a game of that caliber for the Devil Rays against the Blue Jays just because a few schmucks actually want to see that game. Showing a game like that is death, so it makes no sense to not show games in which some of the teams you mentioned are included.
the pinjockey Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 I'll put up where the names I recognize go. Yes there will only be about 5 players max I put up. Jerad Weaver went to Anaheim. Stephen Drew falls to Arizona. Josh Fields goes to CWS.
geniusMoment Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 Cincy drafted Homer Bailey, a high school pitcher with a 97 mph fastball and a hard curve. How long before he needs tommy john surgery like every other reds pitching prospect gets?
Rob E Dangerously Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 and the Royals have picked.. a HS third-baseman who projects to be a DH two left handed pitchers who throw around 85mph You know.. there has to be a way to get Allard Baird out of KC.. anybody want him?
HarleyQuinn Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 Oakland is making an absolute killing in this draft, no surprise. - Landon Powell - Richie Robnett - Danny Putnam - Huston Street - Michael Rogers(Miguel Tejada pick) - Kurt Suzuki Also quite happy that Boston took Dustin Pedroia, a guy who had a 1.168 OPS with 25 extra base hits and a BB vs K ratio of 3:1(33 BB's vs 10 K's)
Vern Gagne Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 Huston Street may be the greatest name in baseball history. Twins had 5 picks in the first 39 selections. SS-Treavor Poulffe LHP-Glen Perkins RHP-Steven Waldroup RHP-Mathew Fox RHP-Jay Rainville A good choice adressing pitching. Would of been nice to see the pitchers selected have a little more velocity on their fast ball. But, 3 of the 4 can reach at least 90 mph.
KingPK Posted June 7, 2004 Author Report Posted June 7, 2004 Just like to point out that Al created a thread for the MLB Draft, so please take the discussion there if you haven't already. Thanks.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 A minor league game last night between the SWB Red Barons (Phillies AAA Affliliate) and the Louisville Bats (Reds) deserves mention. A seven inning game, with one hit between the two teams. Robert Ellis of the Barons pitched a no-hitter, giving up just one walk. Jesus Sanchez walked one, gave up a home run to Mark Davis, struck out 8, and lost the game.
alfdogg Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 I heard the Reds and A's were going to have a series in this portion of I.L. play.
Guest Anglesault Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 I heard the Reds and A's were going to have a series in this portion of I.L. play. FOURTEEN YEARS IN THE MAKING~!
Guest Choken One Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 actually we played each other a few years back... 99 i believe.
Guest Anglesault Posted June 7, 2004 Report Posted June 7, 2004 But was anything really settled? Huh? Huh?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now