Guest Jimbo Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 So....did anyone else watch a bit of the US Open the last few days? Mickleeson SHOULD have won the ting. He was up a stroke with 2 holes left, but went ahead and double bogeyed 17 and Reteif Goosen birdied the next on his way to a two shot victory at -4. I cannot stand all the pathetic "Let's go Phil! Yay for Phil! He finally one a major! Woohoo!" crap and was ardently rooting against him today.... I hope the Open comes back to Shinnecock again soon, it was a lot of fun to watch them play. Yeah, I know most people will say golf is ghey and boring, but it really was fun to watch these guys do anything to try and keep their balls from rolling off hte green. According to one guy it was like putting on a hardwood floor. Yeesh.
Damaramu Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Hey lay off Phil. I was rooting for him to. And yeah I really enjoyed this Open because that course was a freaking monster.
Spicy McHaggis Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Umm, up yours for rooting against Phil Mickelson. Jackass.
alfdogg Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Yeah, why root against Mickelson, of all people? That's like rooting against the Clippers or the Chargers.
Lightning Flik Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 The weather conditions weren't great, the greens were absolutely terrible and no one shot a round that wasn't even (74 I believe was even). That was an absolute riot seeing how almost every single golfer almost was + on strokes.
Guest Jimbo Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Bah, Phil sucks. Go Ernie. Speaking of which, I can't believe he played so poorly today. +10? Cripes.
Star Ocean 3 Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Shouldn't this be in another folder? Golf isn't a sport.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Is that all you have to contribute? Fuck off.
therealworldschampion Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Shinnecock is an absolute monster course. Too bad for Phil, I was rooting for him today. Onto St.Andrew's and the British Open next.
Red Baron Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Besides, Retief had 11 1-putts this round. Putts win championships, and Retief won because of solid putting.
Guest Choken One Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Does Tiger Woods even Play golf anymore? I only watch Sunday during the majors and he hasn't been there in forever. Did he retire or what?
Guest Choken One Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Umm...yeah, he was in the tournament... Clearly you missed the joke...
Hogan Made Wrestling Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Shinnecock is an absolute monster course. Too bad for Phil, I was rooting for him today. Onto St.Andrew's and the British Open next. The British Open is at Troon this year.
Vern Gagne Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 I love the US Open. It's the ultimate test and makes the very best golfers look like weekend hacks. Sure has hell beats Vijay Sing shoot -20.
kkktookmybabyaway Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 I saw about 10 minutes of this tourney -- and all 10 were when Phil choked on that one hole. I laughed, I went out to get ice cream...
Guest Jimbo Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 I guess you have never played golf Jimbo. What the? I've been playing golf my entire life. I just don't get all giddy about Mickleson and how he "deserves" to win all these majors and such. People say he's the best, maybe he is, maybe he isn't, but all I've seen is that exactly once he's been able to win a major championship, which for all intents and purposes, decides the elite of golf, and he always folds. Y'know why Norman isn't called one of hte best ever? Because he gave up 6 majors on the last day when he had a very good chance to win. Norman was definitely a terrific talent, and so is Phil, but they aren't the best by any means. Speaking of the best, I find it hillarious to say that Tiger Woods is in a "slump". So he hasn't won a major in 2 years, oh geez. Nicklaus didn't win one every year and people don't jump on his back, do they? However, he does need to get some control of himself and his ball. Finally, who thinks Shinnecock was unfair? I for one, don't. The courses job was to give the greatest challenge possible to ALL golfers, and it did that. Was it extremely difficult? Yes, but did it keep any sort of player from competing? No. It's a major, it is supposed to be difficult. It is supposecd to be a great achievement to win one. All that crap about nobody being under par for the second round is silly--the scoring of this tournement was similiar to most and this was just a biproduct of a very tough course. Goosen won because he played the course as it was given to him. He constantly looked extra around the holes to see wher ehe could land the ball and give him the best shot to make his putt. That ladies and gentlemen, was the way to play the course. If you know the greens are extremely fast and unforgiving, don't try and force stuff on them and complain about it afterwards, PLAY THEM AS THEY ARE. He wouldn't have had the opportunity to make all those one-putts had he not put himself in position to make them. Mickleson did this as well and should certainly be commended, but he still screwed up, so poo on him.
CanadianChris Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Y'know why Norman isn't called one of hte best ever? Because he gave up 6 majors on the last day when he had a very good chance to win. Bullshit. He got jobbed so many times it was criminal. He should have at least four majors -- he got jobbed by Tway at the 1986 PGA, and by Mize at the 1987 Masters, who holed lucky shots. Mize's was a mishit that happened to go in the hole. All that crap about nobody being under par for the second round is silly--the scoring of this tournement was similiar to most and this was just a biproduct of a very tough course. Were you watching the same tournament I was?? This was the second highest-scoring Open in the last sixty years. The course was tough enough the first two days -- it was really tough on Saturday, and downright criminal yesterday. The greens were DEAD. Making them play on a golf course with dead greens is stupid. Mickleson did this as well and should certainly be commended, but he still screwed up, so poo on him. Fuck that shit. Goosen won this tournament. Mickelson certainly didn't give it to him. He putted better than anyone I've ever seen. Mickelson should've won by 4 or 5 the way Goosen was playing tee to green yesterday.
Crimson Platypus Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Mickelson is the Chris Webber of golf.
Red Baron Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 The greens was poorly conditioned, especially number 7. I don't mean all greens should hold the ball and have kick ass backspin, but watering the greens every so often gave certain golfers an edge.
iggymcfly Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 I don't think you can get on Mickelson too bad about losing this one. On a day when no one in the whole tournament played under par, he made three birdies in four holes to take the lead. Yeah, he double bogeyed 17 to lose it, but he still shot a damn good round, and if Goosen hadn't shot an amazing round, he would have won the US Open by three strokes.
The Tino Standard Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 If you think Shinnecock was difficult this weekend, just keep in mind that Corey Pavin won the Open there in '95 by finishing the tournament at even par. Also, at Carnoustie in '99 (not sure on the year), the winner there finished the tournament at +6.
Mole Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 The weather conditions weren't great, the greens were absolutely terrible and no one shot a round that wasn't even (74 I believe was even). That was an absolute riot seeing how almost every single golfer almost was + on strokes. The wind is what makes the golf course tough. It is only 4 miles away from the ocean.
CanadianChris Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 If you think Shinnecock was difficult this weekend, just keep in mind that Corey Pavin won the Open there in '95 by finishing the tournament at even par. Also, at Carnoustie in '99 (not sure on the year), the winner there finished the tournament at +6. Carnoustie was also wildly unfair that week. Many of the fairways were so narrow that they were unhittable.
Crimson Platypus Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 I don't think you can get on Mickelson too bad about losing this one. On a day when no one in the whole tournament played under par, he made three birdies in four holes to take the lead. Yeah, he double bogeyed 17 to lose it, but he still shot a damn good round, and if Goosen hadn't shot an amazing round, he would have won the US Open by three strokes. I would say that double bogeying on the 17th while tied for the lead is choking. He missed a putt that was practically a gimmie.
Guest Anglesault Posted June 21, 2004 Report Posted June 21, 2004 Shouldn't this be in another folder? Golf isn't a sport. We live in a country where racecar driving and skateboarding are trying to be passed off as sports. That (and only that) has lessened my stance on Tennis and Golf's sports status. On a someone amusing note, I was listening ESPN Radio a little yesterday, and someone wrote in and asked how racecar driving can be considered a sport. The Host's response? (No sarcasm) "What a nimrod! I'll answer that this way: "Motor Sports" is the fastest growing sport in the country!" How that answered the question, I have no idea. Anyway, back on topic, I won't deny it. I pointed and laughed at Mickleson. It was quite funny.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now