Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Maybe they got so little for him cause they're trying to free up as much money as they can for Hasek.

 

And where does Chris Osgood go from here? He probably makes too much money to be a back-up and I imagine the Blues would bring up one of the 4 or 5 other younger goalies they've used the last year or two.

Posted
His trade value wasn't exactly sky-high after his performance in game 7 against the Leafs.

Still could've gotten better than a fourth round draft pick. Lalime is at least worth a second round pick.

 

And it's the 2005 draft which is supposed to be absolutely filled with upcoming talent.

Posted

I don't want Hasek in Ottawa. He's just gonna quit 20 games into the season and feign a knee injury mid-game. Emery and Prusek are supposed to be good, right? Sens should've gotten more than a 4th round pick for Lalime, at any rate.

 

As for Osgood, I'm sure he'll fill a hole somewhere. In fact he could remain the primary goaltender with Lalime as backup. :)

Posted

Detroit might be able to afford two highly paid goalies.. I don't think St Louis can. All I read down here was how the Blues were talking about cutting payroll after the season.

 

Maybe SL will trade one of them to Ottawa after Hasek gets hurt :P

Posted

Wow St. Louis got Lalime for only a 4th round pick? I wonder what Lalime thinks his value was when he heard that.

 

As for Osgood if Lalime was aquired just by a 4th round pick then Im betting he'll probally end up still being the top goalie while Lalime becomes the back up.

Posted

I just don't see the Blues keeping both. Without looking it up, I would assume that they both make $3-4 million at least. And right after their season ended, all I kept hearing/reading about in the St Louis media was them cutting payroll. I would expect one of them to go somewhere else and then bring up Sanford or Davis to be the backup.

Posted

Though I can't find it now, I remember reading a story in which someone from the Blues said Osgood would not be back with the team next year.

Posted
I thought Mike Vernon did most of the goaltending for the Wings in 97 and 98, not Osgood.

 

Nope, Vernon went to San Jose in 98.

Posted
Don't know why they'd keep Osgood.

Something to think about, but Osgood has won the Cup. Lalime, well... where's that beachball picture?

True, but that had a lot to do with the team that was in front of him, as far as Osgood goes.

Posted
Don't know why they'd keep Osgood.

Something to think about, but Osgood has won the Cup. Lalime, well... where's that beachball picture?

True, but that had a lot to do with the team that was in front of him, as far as Osgood goes.

Yep. Osgood had only slightly more to do with the Red Wings winning the Cup than did the equipment manager.

Guest Olympic Slam
Posted

I can't see Blues fans getting too excited about this deal. Lalime doesn't have a bright future to really invest it. Dealing him for a pick in 2005(a draft which might not occur) sounds like the Sens were desperate to get rid of the guy. That doesn't surprise me as the NHL goalie market is REALLY oversaturated and getting rid of damaged(?) goods in Lalime was smart.

Posted

I think they were desperate to get rid of him, based on the fact that they had possibly the best Senators team ever last year in the playoffs, but because of his shoddy goaltending, they were eliminated in the first round.

 

Lalime isn't damaged goods, per se, he's just high maintainance. If he's not absolutely unbeatable, his confidence goes to shit.

 

I would have liked Muckler to get more for Lalime, specifically a more offensive fourth line talent. Varada and Neil are good, but I would have liked to see Peter Sejna come over in the deal too.

 

The Blues are set for goaltender now though. Lalime has been in the league for a while now, he just needs a new setting.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...