kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2004 No daughter, but you'd make a good bitch for them... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teke184 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2004 *feels like he's sitting in on an argument between INXS and NY Untouchable over which one of them is the bitch and which one is the butch* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Styles 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2004 Great One (who since his "inception" I have not endorsed as part of the Fellowship of Conservative Posters or whatever we're calling it this week), is obviously the son. Mike has his own style, Great One copies it, and usually throws in an out of place wrestling comment to boot. Example: AMikeSC: Wow, your post isn't based in facts. I don't care what the NYTime says. Great One: OMG!! New York Times, stuuuupid liberals. What next, 1wrestling.com is a valid source!? Kerry is winning the election like Bret is leading the invasion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NYU 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2004 *feels like he's sitting in on an argument between INXS and NY Untouchable over which one of them is the bitch and which one is the butch* What in the hell does this even mean? Really. Explain it to me. I'm incredibly interested. Seriously. I really am. Explain it, please. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2004 Great One (who since his "inception" I have not endorsed as part of the Fellowship of Conservative Posters or whatever we're calling it this week) I never said he was a member, hippie... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2004 No daughter, but you'd make a good bitch for them... sounds like a gay porno movie Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 6, 2004 No daughter, but you'd make a good bitch for them... sounds like a gay porno movie Never seen a gay porno movie, so I'll bow to your expertise. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2004 No daughter, but you'd make a good bitch for them... sounds like a gay porno movie Never seen a gay porno movie, so I'll bow to your expertise. -=Mike could have been worse, it could have been been a video of you fighting Max Cleland Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 7, 2004 No daughter, but you'd make a good bitch for them... sounds like a gay porno movie Never seen a gay porno movie, so I'll bow to your expertise. -=Mike could have been worse, it could have been been a video of you fighting Max Cleland I'd beat his one remaining limb off of him. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2004 idk.. you have an advantage on limbs and all.. but Cleland has a shot Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 7, 2004 idk.. you have an advantage on limbs and all.. but Cleland has a shot He'd blow his arm off before I got to it. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Your Paragon of Virtue 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2004 No daughter, but you'd make a good bitch for them... sounds like a gay porno movie Never seen a gay porno movie, so I'll bow to your expertise. -=Mike IMPLYING SOMETHING WRONG WITH THAT= HOMOZ BASHING = BANN PLZ~! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbacon 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2004 Great One (who since his "inception" I have not endorsed as part of the Fellowship of Conservative Posters or whatever we're calling it this week), is obviously the son. Mike has his own style, Great One copies it, and usually throws in an out of place wrestling comment to boot. Example: AMikeSC: Wow, your post isn't based in facts. I don't care what the NYTime says. Great One: OMG!! New York Times, stuuuupid liberals. What next, 1wrestling.com is a valid source!? Kerry is winning the election like Bret is leading the invasion. Very accurate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CheesalaIsGood 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2004 What was this thread about? Oh nevermind. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pappajacks 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2004 AMikeSC: Wow, your post isn't based in facts. I don't care what the NYTime says. Great One: OMG!! New York Times, stuuuupid liberals. What next, 1wrestling.com is a valid source!? Kerry is winning the election like Bret is leading the invasion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted October 7, 2004 Great One (who since his "inception" I have not endorsed as part of the Fellowship of Conservative Posters or whatever we're calling it this week), is obviously the son. Mike has his own style, Great One copies it, and usually throws in an out of place wrestling comment to boot. Example: AMikeSC: Wow, your post isn't based in facts. I don't care what the NYTime says. Great One: OMG!! New York Times, stuuuupid liberals. What next, 1wrestling.com is a valid source!? Kerry is winning the election like Bret is leading the invasion. Are you still mad over our little Raw in DC tiff? (Which btw is the only thing I can remember arguing with you on) AMikeSC: Wow, your post isn't based in facts. I don't care what the NYTime says. Great One: OMG!! New York Times, stuuuupid liberals. What next, 1wrestling.com is a valid source!? Kerry is winning the election like Bret is leading the invasion. Hey want another one? The Kerry-Edwards roolz duders are just like the ECW mutants!!!!!!!!! And no matter how average they look, they're awesome! THEY'RE HARDCORE, THEY'RE HARDCORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! For the record I'm just kinda there...............................kinda like Piper in They Live, 'I don't join up with nobody unless I see where they're goin'' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Tom 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2004 Great One (who since his "inception" I have not endorsed as part of the Fellowship of Conservative Posters or whatever we're calling it this week) I never said he was a member, hippie... Good thing, Colonel. The General does not approve of people who frequently use clunky (and often quite bad) wrestling references in Current Events discussions. There is a folder for drivel like that, in the General's opinion. The Conservative Brigade is above such tactics. As you were. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted October 7, 2004 Great One (who since his "inception" I have not endorsed as part of the Fellowship of Conservative Posters or whatever we're calling it this week) I never said he was a member, hippie... Good thing, Colonel. The General does not approve of people who frequently use clunky (and often quite bad) wrestling references in Current Events discussions. There is a folder for drivel like that, in the General's opinion. The Conservative Brigade is above such tactics. As you were. Hey I'm keeping em down I only used the last one in mockery...................No harm no foul Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest BDC Report post Posted October 7, 2004 Great One (who since his "inception" I have not endorsed as part of the Fellowship of Conservative Posters or whatever we're calling it this week) I never said he was a member, hippie... Good thing, Colonel. The General does not approve of people who frequently use clunky (and often quite bad) wrestling references in Current Events discussions. There is a folder for drivel like that, in the General's opinion. The Conservative Brigade is above such tactics. As you were. *snaps salute, takes post by door* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2004 Good thing, Colonel. The General does not approve of people who frequently use clunky (and often quite bad) wrestling references in Current Events discussions. Really? I guess I don't pay attention. There is a folder for drivel like that, in the General's opinion. The Conservative Brigade is above such tactics. Yeah, we have much more sophisticated means of debate. idk.. you have an advantage on limbs and all.. but Cleland has a shot He'd blow his arm off before I got to it. -=Mike I haven't laughed this hard at a TSM post that hasn't been made by INXS in I don't know when... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Styles 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2004 Are you still mad over our little Raw in DC tiff? (Which btw is the only thing I can remember arguing with you on) No, ever since you started posting in CE I labeled you immediately the right's version of INXS, hunger, Kamui, etc. It's not a left or right thing for me, just like those guys (well still is, for now, in INXS's case) come off as borderline trolls/gimmicks, so do you. You rarely provide any real opinions or insights (although I'll give you points for posting the article about the draft bill being squashed), and your incessant mimicking of Mike whether intentional or not is just grating. He has a certain style when he does it, and when you do it, it comes off as "yeah, me too!". Worst of all, though are the horrible, misplaced wrestling analogies that have no place on this board unless absolutely parallel. They're not funny, and they tend to bring the level of discourse down (which is pretty hard to do around here), and in my opinion makes the Conservative posters look like jokes, much like the aforementioned personalities did for the liberals. I think a great start would be to eliminate those. Hey want another one? The Kerry-Edwards roolz duders are just like the ECW mutants!!!!!!!!! And no matter how average they look, they're awesome! THEY'RE HARDCORE, THEY'RE HARDCORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! For the record I'm just kinda there...............................kinda like Piper in They Live, 'I don't join up with nobody unless I see where they're goin'' See, right there is what I'm talking about. Try thinking before you post, and yourself self, "self, is this worth posting? Will it really advance the discussion?" I've wasted too much time on this. At least you don't link to neo-nazi sites to back up your opinions... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2004 No, ever since you started posting in CE I labeled you immediately the right's version of INXS, hunger, Kamui, etc. I don't really care for most of GO's posts, but that is way, way too harsh and off the mark. I've wasted too much time on this. At least you don't link to neo-nazi sites to back up your opinions... --and there's one reason why. Worst of all, though are the horrible, misplaced wrestling analogies that have no place on this board unless absolutely parallel. Agreed on that, though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted October 7, 2004 You know, *I* even agreed on that. That said I only do it out of mockery, but hell if you're gonna turn into Tyler (no homo) on me then I can't help you. and your incessant mimicking of Mike whether intentional or not is just grating. He has a certain style when he does it, and when you do it, it comes off as "yeah, me too!". Unbelieveable that two people could be mostly on the same page politically, right? I mean no chance in hell of that happening! Hey, you wanna see where I stand? Go to that very thread, second one down (Thought this might be interesting), you might be surprised. He just gets to certain things before I do. Oh god robot!!!!!! Who's bringing the discourse down again? You're the ones beginning to act like NYU, NoCal, and the INXS club with your 'Mike's lapdog/pet goat' shit. But it IS good to know that we're pretty much the equivalent (how bout I throw in a more relevant analogy?) of the Allies and Russia in World War II, on the same side but not allies (or is that not it?) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest whitemilesdavis Report post Posted October 7, 2004 QUOTE and your incessant mimicking of Mike whether intentional or not is just grating. He has a certain style when he does it, and when you do it, it comes off as "yeah, me too!". Unbelieveable that two people could be mostly on the same page politically, right? I mean no chance in hell of that happening! I think he was referring to the "witty" one-liners. ---Josh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted October 7, 2004 Oh like 'bringing the content' or 'relevance'? Those? Funny, I've seen those used by more than one poster on this board. So are they all following him too? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
snuffbox 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2004 greatone - Please provide some demonstrations and examples of this 'content' and 'relevance' you speak of. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Easy, Slapnuts! just mentioned it earlier, the draft bill dying.............. Or the 'Where do you stand' thread.................... That's two more than you. You're not the person to tell me what is and isn't content. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
snuffbox 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Its usually not a good sign when your only two posts with 'content' are so easy to mention...'where do you stand' was just a listing of beliefs, and the draft thing was a news link... I would honestly be a bit surprised if anyone besides greatone felt I was often lacking in 'content/substance' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Styles 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 I would honestly be a bit surprised if anyone besides greatone felt I was often lacking in 'content/substance' Oh, you bring the content, it's just usually dead wrong! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted October 8, 2004 Damn, I didn't think Great One is that bad. In fact, I just view him as another poster. No way is he in the INXS/Kamui group -- you gotta put in work for that distinction... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
