Jump to content

This is Becoming a Problem


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Great One (who since his "inception" I have not endorsed as part of the Fellowship of Conservative Posters or whatever we're calling it this week), is obviously the son. Mike has his own style, Great One copies it, and usually throws in an out of place wrestling comment to boot.

Example:

 

AMikeSC: Wow, your post isn't based in facts. I don't care what the NYTime says.

Great One: OMG!! New York Times, stuuuupid liberals. What next, 1wrestling.com is a valid source!? Kerry is winning the election like Bret is leading the invasion.

Posted
*feels like he's sitting in on an argument between INXS and NY Untouchable over which one of them is the bitch and which one is the butch*

What in the hell does this even mean?

 

Really. Explain it to me. I'm incredibly interested.

 

Seriously. I really am. Explain it, please.

Guest MikeSC
Posted
No daughter, but you'd make a good bitch for them...

sounds like a gay porno movie

Never seen a gay porno movie, so I'll bow to your expertise.

-=Mike

Guest MikeSC
Posted
No daughter, but you'd make a good bitch for them...

sounds like a gay porno movie

Never seen a gay porno movie, so I'll bow to your expertise.

-=Mike

could have been worse, it could have been been a video of you fighting Max Cleland

I'd beat his one remaining limb off of him.

-=Mike

Guest MikeSC
Posted
idk.. you have an advantage on limbs and all.. but Cleland has a shot

He'd blow his arm off before I got to it.

-=Mike

Posted
Great One (who since his "inception" I have not endorsed as part of the Fellowship of Conservative Posters or whatever we're calling it this week), is obviously the son. Mike has his own style, Great One copies it, and usually throws in an out of place wrestling comment to boot.

Example:

 

AMikeSC: Wow, your post isn't based in facts. I don't care what the NYTime says.

Great One: OMG!! New York Times, stuuuupid liberals. What next, 1wrestling.com is a valid source!? Kerry is winning the election like Bret is leading the invasion.

Very accurate. :lol:

Posted
AMikeSC: Wow, your post isn't based in facts. I don't care what the NYTime says.

Great One: OMG!! New York Times, stuuuupid liberals. What next, 1wrestling.com is a valid source!? Kerry is winning the election like Bret is leading the invasion.

:lol:

Guest GreatOne
Posted
Great One (who since his "inception" I have not endorsed as part of the Fellowship of Conservative Posters or whatever we're calling it this week), is obviously the son. Mike has his own style, Great One copies it, and usually throws in an out of place wrestling comment to boot.

Example:

 

AMikeSC: Wow, your post isn't based in facts. I don't care what the NYTime says.

Great One: OMG!! New York Times, stuuuupid liberals. What next, 1wrestling.com is a valid source!? Kerry is winning the election like Bret is leading the invasion.

Are you still mad over our little Raw in DC tiff? (Which btw is the only thing I can remember arguing with you on) :lol:

 

AMikeSC: Wow, your post isn't based in facts. I don't care what the NYTime says.

Great One: OMG!! New York Times, stuuuupid liberals. What next, 1wrestling.com is a valid source!? Kerry is winning the election like Bret is leading the invasion.

 

Hey want another one? The Kerry-Edwards roolz duders are just like the ECW mutants!!!!!!!!! And no matter how average they look, they're awesome!

 

 

THEY'RE HARDCORE, THEY'RE HARDCORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

For the record I'm just kinda there...............................kinda like Piper in They Live, 'I don't join up with nobody unless I see where they're goin'' :D

Posted
Great One (who since his "inception" I have not endorsed as part of the Fellowship of Conservative Posters or whatever we're calling it this week)

I never said he was a member, hippie...

Good thing, Colonel. The General does not approve of people who frequently use clunky (and often quite bad) wrestling references in Current Events discussions. There is a folder for drivel like that, in the General's opinion. The Conservative Brigade is above such tactics.

 

As you were.

Guest GreatOne
Posted
Great One (who since his "inception" I have not endorsed as part of the Fellowship of Conservative Posters or whatever we're calling it this week)

I never said he was a member, hippie...

Good thing, Colonel. The General does not approve of people who frequently use clunky (and often quite bad) wrestling references in Current Events discussions. There is a folder for drivel like that, in the General's opinion. The Conservative Brigade is above such tactics.

 

As you were.

Hey I'm keeping em down I only used the last one in mockery...................No harm no foul

Posted
Great One (who since his "inception" I have not endorsed as part of the Fellowship of Conservative Posters or whatever we're calling it this week)

I never said he was a member, hippie...

Good thing, Colonel. The General does not approve of people who frequently use clunky (and often quite bad) wrestling references in Current Events discussions. There is a folder for drivel like that, in the General's opinion. The Conservative Brigade is above such tactics.

 

As you were.

*snaps salute, takes post by door*

Posted
Good thing, Colonel. The General does not approve of people who frequently use clunky (and often quite bad) wrestling references in Current Events discussions.

Really? I guess I don't pay attention.

 

There is a folder for drivel like that, in the General's opinion.  The Conservative Brigade is above such tactics.

 

Yeah, we have much more sophisticated means of debate. :rolleyes:

 

idk.. you have an advantage on limbs and all.. but Cleland has a shot

 

He'd blow his arm off before I got to it.

-=Mike

 

I haven't laughed this hard at a TSM post that hasn't been made by INXS in I don't know when...

Posted
Are you still mad over our little Raw in DC tiff? (Which btw is the only thing I can remember arguing with you on) :lol:

No, ever since you started posting in CE I labeled you immediately the right's version of INXS, hunger, Kamui, etc.

It's not a left or right thing for me, just like those guys (well still is, for now, in INXS's case) come off as borderline trolls/gimmicks, so do you. You rarely provide any real opinions or insights (although I'll give you points for posting the article about the draft bill being squashed), and your incessant mimicking of Mike whether intentional or not is just grating. He has a certain style when he does it, and when you do it, it comes off as "yeah, me too!". Worst of all, though are the horrible, misplaced wrestling analogies that have no place on this board unless absolutely parallel. They're not funny, and they tend to bring the level of discourse down (which is pretty hard to do around here), and in my opinion makes the Conservative posters look like jokes, much like the aforementioned personalities did for the liberals. I think a great start would be to eliminate those.

 

Hey want another one? The Kerry-Edwards roolz duders are just like the ECW mutants!!!!!!!!! And no matter how average they look, they're awesome!

 

 

THEY'RE HARDCORE, THEY'RE HARDCORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

For the record I'm just kinda there...............................kinda like Piper in They Live, 'I don't join up with nobody unless I see where they're goin'' :D

 

See, right there is what I'm talking about. Try thinking before you post, and yourself self, "self, is this worth posting? Will it really advance the discussion?"

 

I've wasted too much time on this. At least you don't link to neo-nazi sites to back up your opinions...

Posted
No, ever since you started posting in CE I labeled you immediately the right's version of INXS, hunger, Kamui, etc.

I don't really care for most of GO's posts, but that is way, way too harsh and off the mark.

 

I've wasted too much time on this. At least you don't link to neo-nazi sites to back up your opinions...

 

--and there's one reason why.

 

Worst of all, though are the horrible, misplaced wrestling analogies that have no place on this board unless absolutely parallel.

 

Agreed on that, though.

Guest GreatOne
Posted

You know, *I* even agreed on that. That said I only do it out of mockery, but hell if you're gonna turn into Tyler (no homo) on me then I can't help you.

 

and your incessant mimicking of Mike whether intentional or not is just grating. He has a certain style when he does it, and when you do it, it comes off as "yeah, me too!".

 

Unbelieveable that two people could be mostly on the same page politically, right? I mean no chance in hell of that happening!

 

Hey, you wanna see where I stand? Go to that very thread, second one down (Thought this might be interesting), you might be surprised. He just gets to certain things before I do. Oh god robot!!!!!!

 

Who's bringing the discourse down again? You're the ones beginning to act like NYU, NoCal, and the INXS club with your 'Mike's lapdog/pet goat' shit.

 

But it IS good to know that we're pretty much the equivalent (how bout I throw in a more relevant analogy?) of the Allies and Russia in World War II, on the same side but not allies (or is that not it?)

Guest whitemilesdavis
Posted
QUOTE 

and your incessant mimicking of Mike whether intentional or not is just grating. He has a certain style when he does it, and when you do it, it comes off as "yeah, me too!".

 

 

 

Unbelieveable that two people could be mostly on the same page politically, right? I mean no chance in hell of that happening!

 

I think he was referring to the "witty" one-liners.

 

---Josh

Guest GreatOne
Posted

Oh like 'bringing the content' or 'relevance'? Those?

 

Funny, I've seen those used by more than one poster on this board. So are they all following him too?

Guest GreatOne
Posted

Easy, Slapnuts! just mentioned it earlier, the draft bill dying..............

 

Or the 'Where do you stand' thread....................

 

That's two more than you. You're not the person to tell me what is and isn't content.

Posted

Its usually not a good sign when your only two posts with 'content' are so easy to mention...'where do you stand' was just a listing of beliefs, and the draft thing was a news link...

 

I would honestly be a bit surprised if anyone besides greatone felt I was often lacking in 'content/substance' ;)

Posted
I would honestly be a bit surprised if anyone besides greatone felt I was often lacking in 'content/substance' ;)

Oh, you bring the content, it's just usually dead wrong! :P

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...