AmericanDragon 0 Report post Posted December 12, 2004 http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,12...1371013,00.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hank Kingsley 0 Report post Posted December 12, 2004 Well, yeah. Audiences these days seemingly can't sit through a three hour movie unless it's gift-wrapped like "Lord of the Rings". Was "Alexander" long? Yes. Was it boring? No. Was it hard to follow? Not if you actually paid attention and had even a modicum of knowledge about Alexander the Great. It was a character study, whether liberties were taken or not. It wasn't a mindless action flick. It's too bad that these movies aren't appreciated in this day and age. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Joshua A. Norton Report post Posted December 12, 2004 Oliver Stone is a lazy communist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
razazteca 0 Report post Posted December 12, 2004 Collin Ferrel was not a good choice for the lead role. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted December 12, 2004 But he's Hollywood's bad boy! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CBright7831 0 Report post Posted December 12, 2004 What if I didn't want to see the movie because I thought it looked like shit? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Retro Rob Report post Posted December 12, 2004 What if I didn't want to see the movie because I thought it looked like shit? You thought correctly. I unfortuantely was stupid enough to plop down $9.50 for it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted December 12, 2004 It honestly doesn't look as bad as everyone is saying that it is. I'll wait for video just b/c I'm strapped for cash though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted December 12, 2004 So Harry Knowles is smarter than most of the respected film critics around? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest JMA Report post Posted December 12, 2004 So Harry Knowles is smarter than most of the respected film critics around? I still can't believe he liked Van Helsing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted December 12, 2004 Yeah. When all else fails, blame the audience. Dumbfuck. Those darn red state movie patrons. There didn't seem to be a problem with audiences with Platoon and Wall Street. (Not sure about JFK because I've never seen nor paid much attention to it, but the other two movies were successful)... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Failed Mascot Report post Posted December 12, 2004 I like the movie The Postman starring Kevin Costner. I don't think my opinion every really matters with movies because of this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted December 12, 2004 I wanted to go see it but the terrible reviews scared me off. Now, I don't respect the opinion of the regular public, but if something gets 15% at Rotten Tomatoes with an average rating of 3.8/10, 99% of the time the movie is in fact crap. That's lower than Van Helsing and almost as bad as Catwoman & YuGiOh!. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Smell the ratings!!! Report post Posted December 13, 2004 I say Oliver Stone owes me 9 bucks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dynamite Kido Report post Posted December 13, 2004 Alexander killed JFK........literally. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Salacious Crumb Report post Posted December 13, 2004 What if I didn't want to see the movie because I thought it looked like shit? Then you just misunderstand the GENIUS of the film. Remember it's OUR fault that the movie isn't entertaining not the guy who made it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teke184 0 Report post Posted December 13, 2004 What if I didn't want to see the movie because I thought it looked like shit? Then you just misunderstand the GENIUS of the film. Remember it's OUR fault that the movie isn't entertaining not the guy who made it. I think the "It's the audience's fault" defense has its roots in director Michael Cimino's legendary high-budget disaster "Heaven's Gate" in 1980 The movie cost $44 million,which is a LOT more than it sounded like considering that the average budget in 1980 was probably closer to $5-10 million. This cost had spiraled out of control because Cimino was nuts, as the original budget was supposed to be $2 million. Among the craziness- Cimino didn't like the set of the town that was built, as he felt certain things were too close together, and had it completely torn down and rebuilt for $1.2 million. Cimino shot 1.5 million feet of film and processed 1 million feet of it. Cimino was such a perfectionist that, by the fifth day of production, they were already four days behind schedule. The original cut of the film was somewhere between 4.5 and 5.5 hours but, under intense studio pressure, Cimino cut it down to 90 minutes. This film is the reason that the Humane Society has to monitor all filmed media in the US, as there were proven to be cockfights, decapitations of chickens, and torture of horses on the set. The millions of dollars in losses from this film almost caused United Artists to file bankruptcy, although the new James Bond film "For Your Eyes Only" saved them the next year. They were still sold to MGM a few years later, though. This film destroyed Cimino's career, as he went from winning a Best Director Oscar for The Deer Hunter to being out of the movie business for 4 years. Coincidentally, one of Cimino's few projects after Heaven's Gate was directing and co-writing "Year of the Dragon" with Oliver Stone, who wasn't a director yet but, instead, an Academy Award winning screenwriter. (He won in 1978 for adapting Midnight Express from William Hayes' biography.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hank Kingsley 0 Report post Posted December 13, 2004 Similarly, there's this article from Ireland Online: Stone faces up to Alexander reception 10/12/2004 - 08:12:04 Oliver Stone refuses to allow himself to get depressed if his most recent movie Alexander, starring Colin Farrell, is a critical and commercial failure worldwide - because he gave it his best shot. Oliver Stone refuses to allow himself to get depressed if his most recent movie Alexander, starring Colin Farrell, is a critical and commercial failure worldwide - because he gave it his best shot. Stone, best known for hits including Platoon and Natural Born Killers, believes that whatever happens, he'll feel down yet he won't succumb to such negative feelings. Stone says: "Whether it's good or bad, I've made a maximum effort. If it doesn't cut the mustard, I have reasons to feel depressed. And if it does, I have reasons to feel depressed because how can I top this? Would I ever want to make a movie after this? Could I ever make another good one? "I know this is the chance of a lifetime." Alexander has already proven to be a flop at the American box office. http://breakingnews.iol.ie/entertainment/s...06932&p=97x6986 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CBright7831 0 Report post Posted December 13, 2004 Yeah. When all else fails, blame the audience. Dumbfuck. Those darn red state movie patrons. There didn't seem to be a problem with audiences with Platoon and Wall Street. (Not sure about JFK because I've never seen nor paid much attention to it, but the other two movies were successful)... What about Nixon? Everybody forgets about Nixon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Smell the ratings!!! Report post Posted December 13, 2004 I liked Nixon but it was too long. I have no idea how it did in the box office cause I'm exceeding lazy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted December 13, 2004 I liked Nixon but it was too long. I have no idea how it did in the box office cause I'm exceeding lazy. Poorly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UseTheSledgehammerUh 0 Report post Posted December 15, 2004 Stone should spend less time reporting why people hate his shitty movies and more time making good ones that people will enjoy & respect. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Precious Roy 0 Report post Posted December 15, 2004 Oliver Stone has a valid point, you are stupid Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Black Lushus 0 Report post Posted December 15, 2004 I didn't think Any Given Sunday was horrible if not vomit inducing thanks to the wacky camera work...same with the Doors... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites