starvenger Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 Looney Tunes also suffers from SNL Syndrome, hardcore cartoon smarks will never accept anything other than the 40's-60's shorts so anything else but the originals will suck. Probably true, because we don't get to see the really bad ones. But when they were good, they were great, and it really is a tough standard to be compared against. Couldn't they just revive Animaniacs? And why did they feel the need to sentai colour the characters?
DerangedHermit Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 A guy on DVDVR made the perfect comparison. This is completely the same as Poochie. Scratchy: Ooh, Poochie is one outrageous dude. Itchy: He's totally in my face. At least Poochie died on the way back to his home planet.
Slayer Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 "This is a kids show intended for kids today who are growing up in the Internet age, an age of technology, an age of hip, cool animation, and something that we hope will resonate with that age group," explained Sander Schwartz, president of Warner Bros. Animation I thought this kind of talk only existed in satiric hyperbole
Nighthawk Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 Come on you guys, it's not like they're burning the negatives of the old cartoons to make these. Isn't this better than trying to recreate those, because they really can't? At least this can be funny in a campy sort of way.
The Czech Republic Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 A guy on DVDVR made the perfect comparison. This is completely the same as Poochie. Scratchy: Ooh, Poochie is one outrageous dude. Itchy: He's totally in my face. ...so does that make you guys the nerds that complan about continuity flaws in a children's cartoon?
CBright7831 Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 What on God's green earth are the idiots at Warner thinking?
The Amazing Rando Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 Watch as Disney does the same thing...and we get ANIMickey Mouse. Then you'll see me explode.
ChrisMWaters Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 Watch as Disney does the same thing...and we get ANIMickey Mouse. Well, as long as he no longer sounds castrated...
The Amazing Rando Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 Like he can fit anything into those tiny red shorts anyway. Hell, most of the people who where the costumes in the theme parks are girls just because they fit the height requirements. On the other hand, taller characters like the Queen of Hearts are male.
ChrisMWaters Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 Like he can fit anything into those tiny red shorts anyway. Maybe that explains why Donald never wore pants...
Slayer Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 "This is a kids show intended for kids today who are growing up in the Internet age, an age of technology, an age of hip, cool animation, and something that we hope will resonate with that age group," explained Sander Schwartz, president of Warner Bros. Animation I thought this kind of talk only existed in satiric hyperbole I swear it sounded exactly like the marketing lady from the Poochie Simpsons episode, except that the WB person was actually serious
The Amazing Rando Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 Donald never wore pants cause he was a sexual freak. Always wore a towel when coming out of the shower though. Goofy was/is on smack. Huey, Dewey, and Louie...well, I can't even explain them. Then again, I can't explain April, May, and June either (Minnie's neices) Yeesh...there goes my disney trivia switch.
Gary Floyd Posted February 19, 2005 Author Report Posted February 19, 2005 http://www.aintitcool.com/downloads/LoonaticsPreview.mov Folks, get ready to cry
Slayer Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 That was kind of funny how they were using not-so-subtle similar names for the characters, so I guess in that sense it's not so offensive. The potential watchability of the series remains to be seen though. On the other hand, what's the deal with trying to revive "Lola" anyway? Like Bugs said in Back in Action, "I don't need no female co-star."
ChrisMWaters Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 On the other hand, what's the deal with trying to revive "Lola" anyway? Like Bugs said in Back in Action, "I don't need no female co-star." Well, Lola's been in Baby Looney Tunes from what I've seen...and I guess they needed at least ONE female member of the team without having to resort to using the non-talking cat that Pepe LePew always chased around.
The Amazing Rando Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 On the other hand, what's the deal with trying to revive "Lola" anyway? Like Bugs said in Back in Action, "I don't need no female co-star." Well, Lola's been in Baby Looney Tunes from what I've seen...and I guess they needed at least ONE female member of the team without having to resort to using the non-talking cat that Pepe LePew always chased around. Well the thing about the cat... she could be the typical anime schoolgirl uber-slut.
Nighthawk Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 I pity you guys for not enjoying this. By the way, if I had to fuck an anthropomorphic cartoon character, I'd fuck Lola.
ChrisMWaters Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 By the way, if I had to fuck an anthropomorphic cartoon character, I'd fuck Lola. Me too. Her and Cleo from that side cartoon from the Heathcliff cartoon series.
Gary Floyd Posted February 19, 2005 Author Report Posted February 19, 2005 I pity you guys for not enjoying this. By the way, if I had to fuck an anthropomorphic cartoon character, I'd fuck Lola. I wouldn't fuck any anthropomorphic character. That out of the way, I have a small thing for Captain Amelia from "Treasure Planet". I think it was her british accent
Guest El Satanico Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 Isn't this better than trying to recreate those, because they really can't? He makes a good point. They may have gone too far with the "edgy futuristic" aspect on the re-designs, but something completly new is still better than "new" versions of the classics with different voices.
Ted the Poster Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 Donald never wore pants cause he was a sexual freak. Always wore a towel when coming out of the shower though. Sure was.
ChrisMWaters Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 Donald never wore pants cause he was a sexual freak. Always wore a towel when coming out of the shower though. Sure was. That sounds more like Yakky Doodle than Donald Duck.
The Amazing Rando Posted February 19, 2005 Report Posted February 19, 2005 If that is the "Donald Orgasm" that ends with "I'll...I'll get you a towel". I've heard it more times in the last few months than I ever thought I would.
Ted the Poster Posted February 20, 2005 Report Posted February 20, 2005 Donald never wore pants cause he was a sexual freak. Always wore a towel when coming out of the shower though. Sure was. That sounds more like Yakky Doodle than Donald Duck. If it was Yakky Doodle then you wouldn't be able to understand a goddamn word of it. God, I hate that little shithead.
The Czech Republic Posted February 20, 2005 Report Posted February 20, 2005 A guy on DVDVR made the perfect comparison. This is completely the same as Poochie. Scratchy: Ooh, Poochie is one outrageous dude. Itchy: He's totally in my face. ...so does that make you guys the nerds that complan about continuity flaws in a children's cartoon? By the way, the answer is yes, and Slayer, that WB exec DOES sound like the woman from the Poochie episode
CBright7831 Posted February 20, 2005 Report Posted February 20, 2005 http://www.aintitcool.com/downloads/LoonaticsPreview.mov Folks, get ready to cry
Boner Kawanger Posted February 20, 2005 Report Posted February 20, 2005 Buzz: Team leader with laser and martial arts expertise Duck: Weapons expert with built-in sonar Roadster: Super speed Spaz: Team muscle with jaws of steel Lexi: Disguise expert with super hearing Slick: Vehicles and surveillance; regeneration abilities How many hours do you think it took them to come up with the name "Duck"?
The Amazing Rando Posted February 20, 2005 Report Posted February 20, 2005 Probably about as long as it took them to come up with whomever the fuck "Slick" is.
Nighthawk Posted February 20, 2005 Report Posted February 20, 2005 It's the coyote, right? If so, slick is similar to wiley, therefore it makes sense.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now