Saddam Begins memoirs

[Gary Floyd 0]

Saddam begins memoirs from behind bars

By Roula Khalaf in London

Published: May 13 2005 21:56 | Last updated: May 13 2005 21:56

 

Saddam Hussein has decided to write his memoirs while he languishes in an Iraqi jail awaiting trial after more than two decades of being responsible for brutal abuses.

 

According to Giovanni di Stefano, who is a member of Mr Hussein's legal team, the former writer of allegorical novels better known as Iraq's dictator resolved in recent weeks to start writing his biography.

[Lord of The Curry 0]

"This book is dedicated to George W. Bush. Thanks for not trying all that hard all these years, old friend."

[Rob E Dangerously 0]

"Dear Reader,

 

If I am dead before I finish this, then I apologize for leaving you in suspense.

 

This book is about why I am so awesome.

 

Sincerely,

Saddam Hussein"

[Murmuring Beast 0]

To Donald Rumsfeld, thanks for the weapons, buddy.

 

To George W Bush, thanks to you and your dad for not finishing the job the first time around. I often look back on the last decade of my reign of terror as the most enjoyable.

[Red Baron 0]

Awesome.

[Justice 0]

"For all those who still believe in giving peace a chance, thanks for the extra time you bought me. If not for you, I wouldn't have had so much time to destroy any records that could have proven useful to the Coalition. Keeping fighting the power guys,

Saddy"

[NoCalMike 0]

Any chance of these memoirs hitting the public without being edited?

[AndrewTS 0]

Am I the only one who got the odd mental image of Saddam's silhouette against the orange sky bg like the Batman Begins poster, due to the odd capitalization?

[Vyce 0]

Any chance of him finishing these memoirs before the Iraqis try him, convict him, and then execute him by firing squad?

[Guest Brian]

Any chance of him finishing these memoirs before the Iraqis try him, convict him, and then execute him by firing squad?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Given how long it's taken so far, I'd be a betting man.

[Toshiaki Koala 0]

Am I the only one who got the odd mental image of Saddam's silhouette against the orange sky bg like the Batman Begins poster, due to the odd capitalization?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Not at all. I was going to make a joke along those lines but couldn't quite formulate it, thus sparing everyone the pain of reading one of my "witty" remarks.

[Guest BrokenWings]

Any chance of these memoirs hitting the public without being edited?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

I'm wondering this as well. If so, it should be an interesting read, if nothing else.

[Justice 0]

Any chance of these memoirs hitting the public without being edited?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Probably. I mean, we don't edit Mein Kampf. I know I'd like to take a look at it.

[Guest Arnold_OldSchool]

Saddam About To Be Suicided?

They Are Getting Ready To Murder Saddam

By Binyamin Dershowits, London

6-10-5

 

Hi Jeff,

 

'They' are ready to assassinate Saddam, there is no doubt in my mind about it.

 

The standard procedure to eliminate Saddam would be IMHO the same as in Dr. Kellys assassination (1), Saddam will 'commit suicide'.

 

A. 'They' must kill Saddam before his trial as they can not allow Saddam to expose details about his partnership with the Bush family and the American administration. Like Churchill had Mussolini and Himmler murdered, 'they' won't spare Saddam.

 

B. 'They' must remove him for that reason, if he is the real Saddam. They definitely must kill him if he is not the real Saddam, in order to hide the fact that he is a double.

 

C. All the above is 'elementary my dear Jeff', but when I saw thousands of articles(2) on Google posted by the Neocons this week, informing us that Saddam is depressed, I immediately knew that 'they' are preparing us for the eventuality that Saddam will 'commit suicide' or, perhaps, die of a rapid disease of some sort.

 

D. Since when did the Neocons have concern about Saddam's morale ?

 

E. And today, the BBC - which is a 'mouth peace' for the Neocons - had the audacity to tell us, that "Saddams lawyers say they have none of the estimated eight million documents relating to the case, and have not been formally told of the charges." (3)

 

If that is not a clear admission that 'they' are not even preparing a trial, I do not know what it is.

 

F. The Neocons are spitting in our faces by making a mockery of American Justice, by not letting Saddam even see his lawyers! "Saddam Hussein has been allowed two meetings with his lawyers since his capture in December 2003." (3)

 

If Michael Jackson can see his lawyers everyday, why not Saddam? Saddam was never even accused of being a paedophile! Saddam never paid millions to parents of little children!

 

G. And the Neocon BBC continues to make it perfectly clear to us NOT TO EXPECT A SADDAM TRIAL! "The complaints from his Jordan-based lawyers cast serious doubts on the claim that his trial could begin on schedule, says the BBC's John Leyne in Amman." (3)

 

H. And just to make it clear to us that the Neocons are war criminals, the Neocons repeatedly remind us: "A spokesman for the legal team, Issam Ghazzawi, said recent pictures of Saddam Hussein in his underwear that appeared in the British Sun newspaper showed that the former Iraqi leader's basic human rights were being violated." (3)

 

This is particularly alarming, since the Sun never showed us Michael Jackson naked!

 

G. And just in case some of us lemmings are extremely stupid, the Neocons keep reminding us every day, that they do not have any plans to start Saddam,s trial. (4)

 

Michael Jackson trial is almost finished, we need something top replace Jackson on TV. Saddam would be just perfect, should we allow the Neocons to deprive us of that ?

 

ELEMENTARY MY DEAR JEFF, 'they' must eliminate Saddam fast before his trial, and before the Downing St Memo (5) make it perfectly clear that Bush & Blair should be on trial with Saddam, too.

 

Jackson is really lucky. As far as I know, he did not have any business deals with Bush, so there is no chance that he would be assassinated. Beside, Elizabeth Tailor, Larry King and Jay Leno all testified that Jackson is a wonderful, innocent, idealistic, shy, guy. 'They' must be good judges of character, they must know what they are talking abou...so, SET JACKSON FREE!

 

And STOP THE WORLD, I WANT TO GET OFF!

 

Oy Oy Oy-vey

 

Yours,

 

Binyamin Dershowits London

[Justice 0]

So... do you have a crazy opinion of your own, or do you just not have enough thought in there to think one up yourself?

[CheesalaIsGood 0]

Perhaps he shares the same opinion? People of the same mind? Shocking.

[Justice 0]

Perhaps he shares the same opinion? People of the same mind? Shocking.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Wow. Such tact. I'm amazed. I was simply referring to the fact that in the only two posts I've seen him post were both amazingly whacked out articles, and it'd be nice to see a defense of either.

 

Or is the insinuation of 'stating your own beliefs than continually relying on others' too much?

 

If you're going to masturbate in my face, at least have the common courtesy to use your own dick.

 

Perhaps this is a better way to say it.

Edited June 12, 2005 by Justice

[EVIL~! alkeiper 0]

15-20 replies so far and no jokes comparing it to the romance novel Saddam supposively wrote? For shame.

[Jingus 0]

bullshit

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

I can't even begin to count the number of factual errors and idiotic statements in that piece. I might come back & Dissect it later if I'm bored.

[Jobber of the Week 0]

To Donald Rumsfeld, thanks for the weapons, buddy.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

You forgot the other half:

"Sorry that I lost them. I hope you'll find them soon, in your own backyard."

[CheesalaIsGood 0]

Perhaps he shares the same opinion? People of the same mind? Shocking.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Wow. Such tact. I'm amazed. I was simply referring to the fact that in the only two posts I've seen him post were both amazingly whacked out articles, and it'd be nice to see a defense of either.

 

Or is the insinuation of 'stating your own beliefs than continually relying on others' too much?

 

If you're going to masturbate in my face, at least have the common courtesy to use your own dick.

 

Perhaps this is a better way to say it.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

 

Perhaps you'd like to post a REASON for them being whacked out so they can be defended? Cuz so far all you did was say that Arnold doesn't think for himself. Which makes me wonder if you really want to hear whjat he may or may not have to say or are just looking to pick another fight.

[Justice 0]

A. 'They' must kill Saddam before his trial as they can not allow Saddam to expose details about his partnership with the Bush family and the American administration. Like Churchill had Mussolini and Himmler murdered, 'they' won't spare Saddam.

 

Ooooooookay. Someone has seen F9/11 a few too many times and thinks he knows something.

 

B. 'They' must remove him for that reason, if he is the real Saddam. They definitely must kill him if he is not the real Saddam, in order to hide the fact that he is a double.

 

Huh?

 

E. And today, the BBC - which is a 'mouth peace' for the Neocons - had the audacity to tell us, that "Saddams lawyers say they have none of the estimated eight million documents relating to the case, and have not been formally told of the charges." (3)

 

Because we all know that the BBC is such a neo-con machine.

 

And I dunno if his name is some sort of joke on Alan, but if you can't see that everything he basically said in there was pretty much bullshit, I can finally understand why you have a hard time speaking.

 

Perhaps you missed all of that, but it and his other article warrant, well, a more personal defense because both are stunningly stupid. (Though at least this one didn't include the 'Central Bankers' and 'Jews controlling the world' stuff)

Edited June 13, 2005 by Justice