Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
I'll say Blood on the Tracks. Heartbreaking. The last really great thing he did, I think.

 

 

Desire from '76 was really good though. "Hurricane" is good despite the STRONGPOLITICALMESSAGE!1 and "Isis" and "Mozambique" are top-notch. "Sara" sounds like it would belong on Blood on the Tracks, but it's great either way. The middle of the album is kinda dull, but I can look past it for the ultrastrong beginning and end.

Edited by The Superstar
Posted

Led Zeppelin-Physical Graffiti

Pink Floyd-Wish You Where Here

Kraftwek-Radio-Activity

Brian Eno-Another Green World

Tangerine Dream-Rubycon

Posted

 

I'll say Blood on the Tracks. Heartbreaking. The last really great thing he did, I think.

 

 

Desire from '76 was really good though. "Hurricane" is good despite the STRONGPOLITICALMESSAGE!1 and "Isis" and "Mozambique" are top-notch. "Sara" sounds like it would belong on Blood on the Tracks, but it's great either way. The middle of the album is kinda dull, but I can look past it for the ultrastrong beginning and end.

Yeah, lots of good songs on that. Not a full album of 'em, though. Blood on the Tracks is.

Posted

blood on the tracks is probably the last great thing dylan did. but the album is overated. he claims its not even about what everyone thinks its about.

 

edit

 

i love bob mostly because he made intentionally bad music so people would leave him alone. how easily could have he reverted back to the music that made him popular in the 60's? becoming a born again christian when he's jewish? a succession of christian rock albums would ruin anyones career. i think somewhere in the mid 90's he's recreated the fire he once had. it shows in all of the retrospective documentaries, autobiographies, scrapbooks show he is on willing to look back at his career. blood on the tracks is a rare album from after 1966 where he actually did well in spite of not wanting to.

Guest RadioBurning
Posted (edited)
Tonight's the Night has to trump anything else released, regardless of what it is. Edited by RadioBurning
Guest RadioBurning
Posted

Tonight's the Night has to trump anything else released, regardless of what it is.

 

why?

 

Personally, there is no album that I recall as being from that time period as much as Tonight's the Night. If somebody mentions one, I might change my mind, but without doing any research I'll operate on that assumption. If you're asking why specifically I like the album, I'm not in the mood to elaborate right now.

Posted

you said it HAS to trump anything else. thats a strong inclination that you'd believe strongly in an album. by believing strongly i though you'd be able to elaborate further. i am not necessarily disagreeing with you.

Guest RadioBurning
Posted

That's cool. As a whole, I really enjoy the album, especially singing along in my car. The guitar work, especially the solo on the second track (starts with "I went to a movie", I don't usually pay attention to song titles), is quite good, and the sloppy parts just make it more endearing to me. The vocals are catchy, as well as the country-ish harmonies, which are one of the main reasons I listen to Flatt & Scruggs, etc.

The only things that bother me are when Neil can't reach the note he's trying to sing, and the second rendition of "Tonight's the Night" that closes the album is mediocre in a coked-up sort of way.

Honestly, a big part of it is probably the fact that all my other old rock records are on vinyl, so I never listen to them, and I grow to love most any album I play over and over. I have 7 or so Young albums, but Ragged Glory is the only other one I have on CD.

Posted

Ill keep my 'Tonights the Night' pick.

 

Tonight is just so raw, vital, and true...the songs might be outclassed (even by many of the oher releases that year) but I don't know if anything more passionate has ever been recorded. There were alot of great albums that year apparently and 'Tonights the Night' (and maybe one or 2 others ever) would I consider to be stronger than 'Born to Run' and 'Blood on the Tracks'.

Posted

Neil Young was never a great lyricist. I've long known that, but if you read the lyrics from Tonight's the Night without the context of the music and its performances, it offers proof that eloquence isn't necessary when expressing grief. It's how you say it, not what you say. Clunky pen be damned.

Posted
Neil Young was never a great lyricist. I've long known that, but if you read the lyrics from Tonight's the Night without the context of the music and its performances, it offers proof that eloquence isn't necessary when expressing grief. It's how you say it, not what you say. Clunky pen be damned.

 

Outside of a few great exceptions Neil wasn't near the lyricist of a Bob Dylan. Plenty of people (fans included) have complained about Neil's lack of singing abilities as well(though hes far superior to Dylan there and, imo, probably the vocal equal of a Roger Waters). There was just this huge intangible about the passion and honesty in Neil's songs. Neil was never more honest than with 'Tonights the Night'

Guest Agent of Oblivion
Posted
I agree with Dylan.

 

For Superstar, why is a strong political message a bad thing?

 

My most frequent complaint about political themes is that it's nearly a guarantee that the music will sound dated at some point.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...