Youth N Asia Posted September 7, 2006 Report Posted September 7, 2006 from Observer http://www.wrestlingobserver.com/wo/news/h...t.asp?aID=17311 --Stephan Bonnar's "A" sample in his drug test taken after the 8/26 fight with Forrest Griffin came back positive for the steroid Boldenone (Equipoise). They will now test his "B" sample, and if it comes back positive (and it is very rare the results aren't identical), he'll be facing a hearing, and a probable fine and suspension.
Lord of The Curry Posted September 7, 2006 Report Posted September 7, 2006 Already reported. Delete plz.
KingPK Posted September 8, 2006 Report Posted September 8, 2006 Ah, I'll keep it open. If it dies, it dies. This sucks because, although this may have been Bonnar using it once to try and save his career in a high-profile match, the match that brought me (and many others) back into MMA now has the black cloud of steroid accusation over it.
Lei Tong Posted September 8, 2006 Report Posted September 8, 2006 Only a guy on horse steroids could survive the DEATH TOUCH!
Lord of The Curry Posted September 8, 2006 Report Posted September 8, 2006 Tong knows what irks me all too well.
randomguy Posted September 8, 2006 Report Posted September 8, 2006 Like plenty of other guys don't use steroids? Please. His mistake was getting caught. Sucks.
Guest Dangerous Donnie D Posted September 8, 2006 Report Posted September 8, 2006 EQ is a very common steroid amongst steroid users. Low risks of side effects, lean muscle gains...its kinda like Deca without the water bloat. Its also one of the hardest to detect in a drug test so Bonnar really really fucked up. Bad.
AboveAverage484 Posted September 8, 2006 Report Posted September 8, 2006 Ah, I'll keep it open. If it dies, it dies. This sucks because, although this may have been Bonnar using it once to try and save his career in a high-profile match, the match that brought me (and many others) back into MMA now has the black cloud of steroid accusation over it. Yeah, but Bonnar lost so I don't think the cloud is that black.
Mik Posted September 9, 2006 Report Posted September 9, 2006 I'm having a hard time seeing how steroids would make THAT much of a difference in a sport that embraces dexterity, flexibility, and pure ability/talent. Sure, Bonnar might have had a little more pop in his punches, but he's not getting the real major benefit of roids...which would be minimum recovery time possible. It's not like he had another fight in rapid succession. Any experts want to fill me in on what I'm missing here?
Guest Dangerous Donnie D Posted September 9, 2006 Report Posted September 9, 2006 Steroids make you stronger, hit harder, more aggressive...etc.
Timmy8271 Posted September 9, 2006 Report Posted September 9, 2006 So if he loses anymore fights, Can Dana let him go? I'm new to MMA so i have no idea. Has he even won a fight since coming to UFC?
Guest Dangerous Donnie D Posted September 9, 2006 Report Posted September 9, 2006 Yes...two very boring decisions. Against top ranked fighters Sam "The Fat Alaskin" Hoger and Keith "The Dude With The Dumbest Nickname in all of MMA" Jardine. The Jardine fight was a close one which honestly could have went to Jardine.
Lord of The Curry Posted September 9, 2006 Report Posted September 9, 2006 Wow, you're in the minority of people who found the Jardine fight boring. It wasn't a serious barn-burner by any means but boring? I'd hate to see what it takes to excite you.
Lord of The Curry Posted September 9, 2006 Report Posted September 9, 2006 It wasn't mind-blowing or anything on the level of Griffin/Bonnar I in terms of a throwdown but it was a close fight with some exciting moments. Gouveia vs Jardine was tons of fun specifically because of the leg kicks and the effect they had on the fight so......yeah. Leg kicks do rule.
Lt. Al Giardello Posted September 9, 2006 Report Posted September 9, 2006 Bonnar also tapped out James Irvin or whatever his name his. The flying knee dude.
Youth N Asia Posted September 10, 2006 Author Report Posted September 10, 2006 I was bored with the Keith fight, but thought he'd lost the decision. Between that and looking bad against Rashad Evans I thought his future was in question
starvenger Posted September 10, 2006 Report Posted September 10, 2006 I was bored with the Keith fight, but thought he'd lost the decision. Between that and looking bad against Rashad Evans I thought his future was in question Here's the thing - Rashad has the ability to make anybody look bad against him. He's a quick guy and he's shown that he's got some pretty good takedowns. But he's shown nothing beyond that so he relies on LnP to get the win. It's hard to make a fight exciting when the other guy's all about the dry humping.
Guest Dangerous Donnie D Posted September 10, 2006 Report Posted September 10, 2006 I'd hate to see what it takes to excite you. You say this because the Bonnar/Jardine fight was boring to me?? What do I find exciting? Fights more exciting than that (and trust me there are plenty of them out there).
Hunter's Torn Quad Posted November 4, 2006 Report Posted November 4, 2006 --Stephan Bonnar received a nine month suspension and $5,000 fine for his steroid test violation as handed down yesterday by the Nevada State Athletic Commission
Mik Posted November 5, 2006 Report Posted November 5, 2006 Wow. This thread made me realize how much I don't miss Dangerous Donnie D.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now