Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Hunter's Torn Quad

WWE to counter in head-to-head with Ortiz vs. Shamrock III...

Recommended Posts

With ECW going head-to-head on 10/10 with the Spike TV Ken Shamrock vs. Tito Ortiz III match, at first the word was WWE was not going to acknowledge or counterprogram.

 

However, WWE announced today it will have a live strip poker game with all the women in the promotion (Raw, Smackdown and ECW) as its counter to the UFC two-hour live show.

 

From Meltzer.

 

trainwreck.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, I can just taste the ratings...and they aren't good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Kobe24KGold

I'll bet anyone that the Strip Poker special will get higher ratings than Shamrock vs. Ortiz III.

 

UFC viewership caps out at maybe 1.6 or 1.8. The only reason why they garner great PPV buyrates relative to WWE is because about 80 percent of the people who watch UFC on Spike order the PPV's; whereas, for WWE, only 10-15 percent of RAW/Smackdown viewers purchase the PPV's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jimmy Jack
Wow, I can just taste the ratings...and they aren't good.

 

 

Tastes kind of like ass... And not in the good way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll bet anyone that the Strip Poker special will get higher ratings than Shamrock vs. Ortiz III.

 

And which one will do more long-term good for their respective groups?

 

The only reason why they garner great PPV buyrates relative to WWE is because about 80 percent of the people who watch UFC on Spike order the PPV's; whereas, for WWE, only 10-15 percent of RAW/Smackdown viewers purchase the PPV's.

 

Which shows just how great a job UFC is doing. They have less viewers to their TV show and still get more people to buy their PPV's than WWE can.

 

And the percentage of Raw/SD viewers who get the PPV's is around 5%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm slightly curious as to what stupid way they'll avoid showing nudity, but otherwise I'll probably forget about this. It'll draw about the same rating as the Diva Search finale, maybe higher because of the established divas. I'll laugh if it does out-draw UFC. Would it have any affect on the perceived Wrestling/MMA rivalry if WWE could embarrass UFC with a diva special?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Hotbutter Spoontoaster

Yeah, I think I'll watch Ortiz/Shamrock III and get my porn where I usually do...the internet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Kobe24KGold
I'll bet anyone that the Strip Poker special will get higher ratings than Shamrock vs. Ortiz III.

 

And which one will do more long-term good for their respective groups?

 

The only reason why they garner great PPV buyrates relative to WWE is because about 80 percent of the people who watch UFC on Spike order the PPV's; whereas, for WWE, only 10-15 percent of RAW/Smackdown viewers purchase the PPV's.

 

Which shows just how great a job UFC is doing. They have less viewers to their TV show and still get more people to buy their PPV's than WWE can.

 

And the percentage of Raw/SD viewers who get the PPV's is around 5%.

 

 

Yeah, I agree.

 

I'm just sayin that i expect the ratings of that night to be in wwe's favor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Would it have any affect on the perceived Wrestling/MMA rivalry if WWE could embarrass UFC with a diva special?

Only to people who hate MMA. The reality is that the viewers UFC draw are far more likely to want to come back than the viewers who'll get drawn by the Strip Poker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Won't the people who go out of their way to watch strip poker already be avid WWE viewers? I don't see that special drawing non-fans, unlike Ortiz/Shamrock.

Any non-fans that the special actually draws will either never tune back in out of disgust, or tune back in wanting to see more hot women and then tune back out when they finally realize they can see far hotter women, and see them naked, elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, I think I'll watch Ortiz/Shamrock III and get my porn where I usually do...the internet.

you can get the same level of top titty cleavage by watching those late night julie strain b-movies on spike tv.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, this is cool. I didn't think WWE was petty enough to be trying to beat UFC in the ratings that mean nothing (since WWE gets no money from ads now) when they should more concerned with UFC kicking their ass in PPV buyrates.

 

WWE would rather win a battle with NO money involved than winning the one with ALL of the money involved. That's WWE logic at its best.

 

Besides, without Trish there, this is going to be a trainwreck of a segment anyway.

 

And isn't there a little project called ECW that has to force fed to the WWE audience that night?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how they will rig a poker game. Well, probably not much different from regularly rigged poker games.

 

Is this going to be the entire show or just the advertised special attraction?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is this going to be the entire show or just the advertised special attraction?

Meltzer thinks it'll be interspersed through the show. I guess the idea being that people will have to stay tuned for the chance to see a woman naked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×