Broward83 Posted December 6, 2008 Report Posted December 6, 2008 From what I've read, Shawn works a very reduced house show schedule. I only remember because there was something mentioned on one of the "sites" about WWE having internal talks about getting Kurt back into the WWE and putting him on a schedule a lot like Shawn's..
haws bah gawd Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 Does Kurt still have his painkiller problems, or has he cleaned himself up? I'd love to see him back. I'd like to see what he can do with some of WWE's new guys.
Thanks for the Fish Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 Thank you Prichard (if true) because that storyline is shit.
foleyfanforever88 Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 I don't care what the storyline is, as long as that match takes place at Wrestlemania.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 I don't care what the storyline is, as long as that match takes place at Wrestlemania. And that whoever is scheduled to retire more imminently (may it be Taker or Shawn) loses.
garfieldsnose Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 I kinda dig the Bearer return and telling Undertaker it's time to go home. That part rules.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 You know, it would have been awesome to explain if Taker lost at Mania, that he only "lived" for as long as he was undefeated at the biggest stage of them all, and once he loses, he vanishes like a ghost.
Burning Pirate Ship Sex Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 I for one, am hearted to know that the secret to Taker's ability to be reborn at Summerslam 94 was his victory over Giant Gonzales at Wrestlemania 9.
Prophet of Mike Zagurski Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 Hey is Vince Russo back? (old joke) Why did Bruce get fired?
Enigma Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 Why are we blacking out things that haven't happened yet and probably won't happen? Stop being paranoid, people. And why is this story even in General Discussion? If there was a subject that needed its own thread, it's this.
Hunter's Torn Quad Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 That 'story' certainly isn't in the latest Observer and I don't think Meltzer has mentioned anything even remotely like it. Far more likely someone made shit up and used the Observer to try and make it seem credible.
fazzle Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 Plus... Does anyone really believe there's any chance WWE has anything planned out that much in detail for 4 months ahead?
Enigma Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 Plus... Does anyone really believe there's any chance WWE has anything planned out that much in detail for 4 months ahead? Well, to be fair, they did have the Flair stuff mapped out all the way back to October '07.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 Plus... Does anyone really believe there's any chance WWE has anything planned out that much in detail for 4 months ahead? When it comes to handling one of their most recognizable stars and a long time locker room veteran/leader's retirement? Yes I'd bet on a long term plan.
The Truthiness Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 Why are we blacking out things that haven't happened yet and probably won't happen? Stop being paranoid, people. And why is this story even in General Discussion? If there was a subject that needed its own thread, it's this. Because nobody really gives a fuck, but you it seems.
DrVenkman PhD Posted December 8, 2008 Author Report Posted December 8, 2008 It's not blacked out anymore, it never should have been. It's general discussion because it's horse shit.
fazzle Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 Plus... Does anyone really believe there's any chance WWE has anything planned out that much in detail for 4 months ahead? When it comes to handling one of their most recognizable stars and a long time locker room veteran/leader's retirement? Yes I'd bet on a long term plan. I doubt they would have much more planned than "HBK vs. UT. HBK heel (? maybe?)" written up. I don't buy them having long term DETAILED plans.
DrVenkman PhD Posted December 8, 2008 Author Report Posted December 8, 2008 unblack this, Dr. Dickman. I wasn't doing it with malice
foleyfanforever88 Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 It would be somewhat hilarious if Undertaker was put in the MITB match at Mania this year, lost, and was never seen again. EDIT (before I even click Add Reply): No it wouldn't.
Thanks for the Fish Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 unblack this, Dr. Dickman. I wasn't doing it with malice You should have been...
The Truthiness Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 Well it's gone now, thanks HTQ for answering a simple question.
Enigma Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 Another thing that should have made it clear that it was bullshit is that trying to "cremate" someone alive probably wouldn't qualify for TV-PG.
DrVenkman PhD Posted December 8, 2008 Author Report Posted December 8, 2008 I really hated stuff like Undertaker trying to murder Steve Austin so he could embalm him during the Attitude era. Come on now. I figure if something was bad enough that I hated it in 1998, it must really have sucked.
Enigma Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 WWE commentator Michael Cole turns 40 today. Former WWE personality, "The Doctor of Style" Slick, turns 65 today.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 It would be somewhat hilarious if Undertaker was put in the MITB match at Mania this year, lost, and was never seen again. EDIT (before I even click Add Reply): No it wouldn't. I laughed thinking about it. So yes, it is hilarious. Now should they? No.
Silence Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 WWE commentator Michael Cole turns 40 today. Older, but still not wiser at commentary.
Aero Posted December 8, 2008 Report Posted December 8, 2008 Michael Cole has shown on DVDs that when he's not being fed all of his lines through the headset, he's actually a pretty decent commentator on his own. I will say that I liked listening to him much more when he was partnered with Tazz on Smackdown than any of the recent years, though.
Recommended Posts