Downhome

I'd be for that if we didn't already know that the match is going to end with Goldberg screwing lesnar over, causing Eddy to win the title. I don't like when matches go very long, only for the ending to be some sort of overbooked screw job. I'd rather it go about 20 or so with great action, then the cheating finish. I just feel cheated when I watch an outstanding match for so long, only for the ending to be overbooked.

Tom knows lots of interesting people. Ah Tom...fair enough.

Marney, I know little of your history here, so let me ask you something. I can't remember ever seeing you post in any of the folders with a wrestling topic, so just how did someone of your status make your way to a wrestling message board? How did you find your way here?

Im sure it was...I dont think anyone here used it seriously. My point about was that I actually know people who use it in seriousness when this issue comes up. I wasn't joking at all. When more kids are killed each year by drowning in a bathtub or a freaking plastic bucket than they are by firearms, what does that say exactly? Why can't you actualy respond to what I said way back in this thread, instead of just taking it as a joke, as if I couldn't possibly be serious. It's a serious point. If more kids are killed by drowning in those two items than they are by firearms, are you for either banning tubs/buckets or putting strict regulations on them as well?

OMG!

We should all go out and download a song for this guy. And yes, I feel weird watching Owen/Bulldog, or any match which involves a deceased wrestler.

It's like, when I watch Three's Company now it feels a little odd.

Here is something wonderful from heat.

Well it's better than the idea of outright banning anything like that from ever being allowed to take place again.

Apparently they have WCW's old production crew on hand tonight.

Sorry about that, click on the link again, I fixed it. This DVD is worth the money just for the Goldberg/Hogan match and Flair's return alone, to me at least. I was at both events, and I've wanted both on DVD for the longest time. Everything else is just a bonus to me.

Check this out. DVD review

Well of course, you can say that again.

It's like asking why people like cats more than dogs. It's purely opinion based. No it isn't, if you know music and musical talent, you can perfectly say that one person has more talent than another, especially vocal wise. Saying that they prefer one talent over another, now that's opinion based.

"From The Whole Ten Yards, Mathew Perry." I found that odd.

I wish I cound understand how some people can say that Britney has more talent than Christina.

I didn't take that personally, I was speaking in general. I understand all of that, but their opinion of the WWE product shouldn't come into play at ALL when deciding who is a mod. Like I posted before in response to CC, you should go by their history on the board, and everything else I said. That's my opinion anyway. To fault someone because they either hate or love WWE is just stupid to me. What does that mean exactly? You simply shouldn't base who is a mod on their opinions. It should be people who post in the forum, who are respected, who you trust, and people who have a clean history. NOT based on what they think of the WWE product. I'm amazed that you even allowed such things into the decision making process. With all of that said, I have nothing against those who ARE mods, I'm just saying.

No, that doesn't make any sense at all. You should base who is a mod on their opinions of the WWE product, you should base who is a mod by what I said earlier, as well as their history as a poster. If someone has never showed bias, meaning they have never flamed someone because of their opinion, then what they think of the product shouldn't matter at all when it comes to their being a mod. That's just a close minded and insane outlook on things.

Victoria has never looked hotter, ever. I want some pictures NOW.

I have a question. What about the folders like CE? Is anything going to change in there?

Oh wow, a very awesome preview of Benoit/Flair for tomorrow night's RAW.

What in the world does that have anything to do with someone being a good mod or not? You shouldn't take their actual opinions on WWE into account when deciding on something like that. All that matters is if they actually post in the forum enough so that you know they'll be around, they are respected by "most" people who post in the forum, and that you feel that you can trust them.

Two things. 1) Know what you are talking about before you post. (To make sure you understand I'm just joking around, here is a smile.) http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20031120_705.html 2) Yeah, and I think it's even funnier when people bring up the water deaths in tubs and buckets, that you totally ignore that fact, and decide to say something totally not on the topic by posting something like what I've quoted you here saying.

That entire paragraph comes off as very condescending and your choice of words like "hell bent" holds a very strong conotation with people, myself included which is why I singled that one comment out. I had no problem with the rest of your post since you are trying to help out and I appreciate that. Well take it however you want, but just understand that whatever I post here I never mean anything in a bad way. When I DO mean something in a bad way, you'll know the difference, heh.

Boy, do I detect some sass in that remark? I sure as hell HOPE NOT!! (Pun wasn't originally intended, but works out well ) Heh, trust me, no "sass" was intended. I was actually seriously asking, becuase Sass and I had a misunderstanding the other day, and I'm trying to avoid that again. But yes, the key is to not alienate any of the loyal posters that we have here.