So, your supporting Max Kellerman's argument that is in essence: "Since other people have cheated in the past and didn't get caught/punished for it, it is therefore unfair to pick on someone who is cheating in the present." Umm.... This is about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. It's like saying, "Since OJ Simpson wasn't convicted of murdering his wife then Scott Peterson shouldn't have been either.
A corked bat didn't make Babe Ruth throw harder, run faster, swing harder, withstand injuries better, or be such an intimidating presence that pitchers walked his body-armored ass at every plate appearance in fear of an instant homer. It just took a few negligible ounces of the weight off his baseball bat. To me, there's a huge difference in the two.