Rob E Dangerously
Members-
Posts
5862 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by Rob E Dangerously
-
As long as you don't laugh at the wrong time or anything, it'll work
-
That sounds like commie talk to me. I don't believe in Libertarians.
-
"For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you." I'm just saying.. *shrug* And let's face it, it should be easy to get him fairly on at least one charge that would carry a Death sentence.
-
a classic set of promos
-
CBS News is Reporting Sovereignty Handed Over
Rob E Dangerously replied to a topic in Current Events
Yep.. Iraq is now free! http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apm...Iraq%20US%20Law -
If Clinton's Coolidge then wouldn't Bush be Hoover?
-
SWF Storm Card, July 2nd.
Rob E Dangerously replied to the.weej's topic in Smarks Wrestling Federation
Hopefully Sean Davis posts stats soon. -
Official "I saw Fahrenheit 9/11" thread......
Rob E Dangerously replied to NoCalMike's topic in Television & Film
You mean you can ride Moore's crotch just by objecting to you snapping on soembody who just mentioned a quote Okay MikeSC McCarthy.. whatever ya say. -
FLASHBACK Marney: "Either handle him or I leave. I come here for discussion, not to provide a target for your dumber mods whenever they're bored." Ill: "If you want to leave because of that, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out."
-
Oh, you're so mature... Banky and MikeSC.. *gets the popcorn*
-
And one of the biggest signs was a high priced free agent named Juan Gonzalez. That's not being totally cheap. Spending alot of money on free agents isn't really the solution to the problem anyways.
-
When the questions step up, the answers will step up.
-
It's time for you, the POSTERS, to decide!
Rob E Dangerously replied to IllustriousOne's topic in No Holds Barred
Um Mad Dog, I don't think the style I usually see from Mike is much of a debating strategy. Maybe I just haven't been enlightened to the debating strategies where you insult your opponent and various other people, while blaming others. Then you don't pay attention to debates very much. They take it somewhat to an extreme but taking shots at the person you're debating is fairly common. I forgot such classic debate moments as "Perot, you are a dolt" - Clinton, 92 "Does making asinine comments make you cool?" - Mondale, 84 "This gets filed under "tough shit"." - Carter, 80, commenting on the recession Damn. -
Official "I saw Fahrenheit 9/11" thread......
Rob E Dangerously replied to NoCalMike's topic in Television & Film
so Mike, how was the movie? -
Like i'd drink that stuff
-
It's time for you, the POSTERS, to decide!
Rob E Dangerously replied to IllustriousOne's topic in No Holds Barred
Um Mad Dog, I don't think the style I usually see from Mike is much of a debating strategy. Maybe I just haven't been enlightened to the debating strategies where you insult your opponent and various other people, while blaming others. -
they're probably in front of you No.
-
Crappy pitching and lousy hitting Anything Sheep I hope we can spell Rob not totally sure.. Willie Nelson was a good one though last I checked, it was on the floor
-
Sure, i'm going to bed soon (checks clock.. 5:16..).. so i'll answer in the "morning" Ok?
-
Maddix, before you get too enthusiastic, I was in SJL for a time in late 2002.
-
To be more specific, her title was changled to "I LIKE BUSH", which seemed to not go over well with her. I think the read has been covered
-
It's time for you, the POSTERS, to decide!
Rob E Dangerously replied to IllustriousOne's topic in No Holds Barred
Rob E Dangerously presents 'Cliff Notes: TSM'. So you won't have to read though all those long threads. -
It's time for you, the POSTERS, to decide!
Rob E Dangerously replied to IllustriousOne's topic in No Holds Barred
Let's go to the debate NoCalMike makes original post vivisectvi replies to snippet with sarcastic reply CoreyLazarus cites B4C, is ignored Mike debates the point of vivi by asking "Does making asinine comments make you cool?" Betty Houle posts an Ebert column Mike respoinds to the points in that column by saying ""The Reagans" was MILDLY critical? Ebert is a fucking moron." Metroman adds thoughts Mike replies, brings up Liberal support of Moore, calls the film a joke Mole asks Mike if he's seen the movie which he's calling a joke Mike says that he doesn't have to see it Yami notes that Mike's credbility went down with that statement Mike debates that point by stating "Don't you have more moronic non-points to make elsewhere?" KKK promises no fat jokes, says he won't see the movie TheOriginalOrangeGoblin says he loved the movie NoCalMike says that the thread has been hijacked Mike refutes that point by saying "This gets filed under "tough shit"." MrZsasz replies to the Ebert post with "Could you stop being so bitchy and obsessively pedantic?" Kotz notices the Corey post Mike pledges to not be bitchy and all that if Zsasz does the same Renegade mentions a change of the thread title in relation to Mike's replies, reviews the movie Mike debates the 'thread title' point with "Renegade, you are a dolt", also mentions the idea of a movie with a conspiracy theory about Clinton and Ron Brown wouldn't be reacted to the same NoCalMike notes that with that idea "it would be fair for to ask that people replying to the thread had actually seen the movie" godthedog wants the thread to be a Movie topic and not a CE topic Mike replies to the sentiments about anti-Moore people with "Gee, I feel the same way about the people who think he's just peachy" godthedog clarifies "yeah, post was edited to make it more clear that i was referring to the degeneration of the whole discussion, not just those who think he's a fat, overrated, lying sack of shit." Mole questions having an opinion on a movie without seeing it NoCalMike replies to the first godthedog post with a headbanging symbol vivisectvi declares Mike's reply to godthedog to be asinine treble charged asks for the thread to stay on topic Mike blames NoCalMike and vivisectvi for the thread going off topic, claims they want a "circle jerk" IllustriousOne notes the title of the folder, and that he hasn't seen the movie Mike claims the posts were off-topic IllustriousOne compliments Mike's intelligence, notes that the intentions of the thread were clear NoCalMike notes the movie was better than expected Mole comments on the 'circlejerk' by citing the first post Vitamin X replies to NoCalMike's comments about the 2000 election facts, mentions the ignorance of people Corey talks about B4C Mike asks for cites, claims stuff is myths, says that he won't correct Mole because his head is in his ass JAxlMorrison asks Mike for cites on the invented parts of the movie Mike thinks JAxl was talking about the Reagans JAxlMorrison clarifies and says he was talking about Fahrenheit 9/11 Mike cites the errors in Moore's film (which he hadn't seen at this point) slacklet comes in and the thread falls apart Out of 13 posts to that point, i'd say one post was him taking part in a debate. He goes get half-points for the Ron Brown thing, the reply about how certain Florida events were myths and for the errors in Moore's film. He might get some credit for the post about the errors in "The Reagans" Basically, Mike's posts were made up of various insults to other posters, and not some part of a debate. And he blamed the thread going off-topic on the first two posters. It seems that if he hadn't posted in that thread, it would have stayed a reaction thread. But, he felt the need to comment with the debate inspiring "Does making asinine comments make you cool?". Ok Mad Dog. Whatever ya say. -
I didn't screw up too badly, did I?
-
Lita should become pregnant in order to protect the business