SuperJerk

Some noteworthy comments from over the weekend: credit: PW Insider via WrestlingHeadlines.com

Unless he wins it back the very next night on Raw. I find it somehow disturbing Cena has had one of the longest WWE title reigns since Deisel. While only half of JBL's, its pretty damn long compared to any other WWE champion over the last decade.

Who the hell is Sean Hannity, a question asked by the uneducated with their fingers far from the pulse of the community. Did I get that right? I think I'm pretty close. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's a quote (minus the Sean Hannity for Leonardo Leanardo) from Clerks: The Animated Series. Here's the quote, it might not be exactly right... Randal : As someone with their finger on the pulse of this community I ask you, who the hell is Leonardo Leonardo? Reporter: (on TV)Who the hell is Leonardo Leonardo? It is a question asked by the poorly educated, whose fingers lie far from the pulse of this little community. Randal Graves: You're poorly educated. Dante Hicks: You're talking... to the television. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The "Did I get that right" part is what threw me, since I didn't realize you'd moved from a joke to an actual question. You might try adding an extra space or parentheses next time. That, and the last 5 times I watched the "Clerks" cartoon I had the DVD commentary on (which is HILARIOUS), so I missed a lot of the jokes.

Sounds like what they tried to do with "Superman/Batman: Generation"...except good.

Superman #166 was okay with me. I liked Alan Moore's take on Krypton life in the issue where Supes and Mongul duked it out since it made them seem a little more human. You couldn't do that with Byrne's version of what Kryptonian life was like so the storyline possibilities were less varied. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The thing about that is, though, anything to be done with that version of Superman's origin was pretty much already done by the time Byrne came along. The thing I like most about Byrne's Krpton is that it actually seemed like a plausible alien world, instead of a 1930s science fiction writer's idea of what an alien culture might be like. Byrne's version, though, I've heard was nullified by Superman: Birthright. I have not read Superman: Birthright, but what changes were made to Superman's origin in that story?

My only reaction to this story was surprise that WON has a Hall of Fame.

"My Two Dads" > "Blossom"

I haven't paid attention to sales in years, so its weird seeing a non-X-Men title in the top Marvel spot. Of course, you COULD argue that its because New Avengers has Wolverine...but Ultimates does not, and it beat the regular X-Men titles also. Hmm...

Peter David's Supergirl. It sucks that it was replaced by a shitty silver age retread.

Not particularly. Its got a few really awesome lines and gags in it, but it completely falls apart 2/3 of the way into it, making way for the climax that manages to be a romantic comedy cliche while simultaneously making no sense whatsoever. I suspect the same people are seeing it over and over because the redhead was so fucking hot.

USA Weekend Box-Office Summary 19 August 2005 (Sunday Estimates) Rank Title Weekend Gross 1. The 40 Year-Old Virgin (2005) $20.6M $20.6M 2. Red-Eye (2005/I) $16.5M $16.5M 3. Four Brothers (2005) $13M $43.6M 4. Wedding Crashers (2005) $8.28M $178M 5. The Skeleton Key (2005) $7.4M $30.1M 6. March of the Penguins (2005) $6.68M $48.6M 7. Valiant (2005) $6.09M $6.09M 8. The Dukes of Hazzard (2005) $5.75M $68.8M 9. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005) $4.54M $193M 10. Sky High (2005) $4.01M $50.8M http://www.imdb.com/chart/ I'm still shocked at how well "Wedding Crashers" (only first 2/3 was even remotely funny) and "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" (not terrible, but didn't live up to either the book or the original movie) are doing. But, hey, check out those Penguins marching away with some mad $$$.

http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=21052 No real details yet, but this would be great.

Yeah...the fact that Angle beat Hogan on PPV is just enough to keep me from completely hating Vince McMahon.

That's a good point, but consider 2 things: -HBK was last seen getting the best of Hogan on Raw, which in WWE logic means Hogan will win; -Vince his consistently let Hogan win for no reason in the past.

That'll be someone's username by the end of the month.

I'm not talking about it because I didn't see it. I'm boycotting Smackdown until I give a shit about anyone they're pushing.

Yikes. I guess the second line of the thread title should have been "to the buffet line". I mean her legs don't look too bad, but she's got more chins than the Chinese phone book.

Winnah~! I thought he did pretty good in the original V1 days <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I agree with Ravenbomb. His early V1 stuff was pretty good.

Predictions: Hogan Edge Batista Cena Angle Mysterio Orton Benoit

Here. You need this. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405422/fullcredits

It makes more sense to blame the person seeking the divorce for seeking than the divorce than it does to attack her for his seeking of the divorce. All it took was one person using the divorce as evidence she doesn't care about her family, and everyone else jumped on the "divorce must be her fault" bandwagon. I was merely pointing out an alternative possibility. It is wrong for you guys to both use this divorce as: a) a sign she lacks a committment to her family, and b) evidence that her anti-war argument is invalid. For some reason, you guys keep doing it anyways.

He was signed when he was doing the run ins.. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Storyline wise he wasn't signed until a couple of weeks ago. I quit caring before that, but after he was signed in real life. I'm trying to figure out why I quit caring about this angle after the second run-in.

I quit caring before that. Does Stacy know about this?

He made a good point when he said that her soon had done his duty voluntarily. The second sentence has nothing to do with the first. You saying my argument is weak doesn't make it weak. Try using a real reason next time. You saying its weak over and over doesn't prove anything either. Unless you can can show she's an employee of the DNC, your analogy is invalid. Why should it be considered? Because it shows she's woman who doesn't know her place is by her man's side? But you don't know why he's divorcing her! Huh?