natey2k4

The only real thing that pisses me off about Wrestling is when Referee is knocked out, Wrestler A cheats using a steel chair on Wrestler B. Wrestling A wins the title or the match, when suddenly Referee #2 comes out, and tells Referee #1 what happened, thus disqualifying Wrestler A. That pisses me off SO much.

It wasn't awful. It wasn't a classic. But it was good. I liked the match, and liked it more upon second viewing. The ending pissed me off.. but we all know how "HARMFUL!!" the pedigree is.

Why can't HBK own HIAC. Sure he's only had two.. but both were good.. Taker had two bad ones (Foley, Bossman) and Foley's WAS bad as a match, just entertaining. It's brutal to watch over and over. HBK's were both good, none were bad. Triple H had a good one against Foley, but its WAY overshadowed cuz the Street Fight kicked its ass. The Jericho/Nash ones I don't remember (even though I have the Nash one on DVD) I'll say HBK owns the HIAC, because his were best.

The lower card videos would of course seem "less" epic, and be more just showing clips to make the match seem somewhat important and make the match seem like it should be on the PPV or at least has a reason to be there,.

Trytan? Thanks for just giving them a replacement

I dont know the matches just seem a HELL of a lot more important with hype videos. Yeah, maybe throw them on Heat, but I think they should all get hype videos, because it makes the matches seem important. Some people only watch PPVs, and not the TV Shows... and other older fans looking back, could be like oh wow.. these guys actually meant something. While I guess it would take up alot of time, use them on Heat and throw every match a Hype Video (which could be inserted Pre-Match on the DVDs).

A lot of people are starting to like Tyson Tomko now..

Alright the Question of the Day returns here with a new question. Should each and every WWE PPV Match have a build up video before the match is shown? I just got this question from watching No Mercy 2004 and seeing the hype video for Kidman/London. It made the feud seem all that more important.. and really seemed to make the match much more important. Should even jobber matches like say for example, Chris Masters v. Steven Richards, get a hype video? Regardless of the length of the match, or the "feud" (feud being Richards is jobber material for Masters to kill) would it make the match/wrestler seem more important if it showed highlight clips? The whole video would consist of Masters continously Masterlocking people and winning, until he brings up the point that if anyone can escape they win $1000. Then clipping away to Steven Richards winning a match or two on Heat. It could have Richards say something along of the lines of he'll be the first one to escape the Masterlock (could be as little pre-pared as the Heat before the PPV) followed by showing Masters defeating all the people he's beat once again. Not to metion when younger fans look back, it'll make them think all the wrestlers were important, instead of just one or two. And if they were still around, it would make them more interested. I don't know just a question and something to think of.

I would think it would be smarter to get a TV Deal first. Adveritise it for a couple of weeks on the air, and bammo your gonna get some viewers when your ready to start.

rather see Killings in that match? Yes. would it make any storyline sense? No.. unless Nash went searching for a replacement on the PPV cuz of his injury and Killings stepped up. I guess it could make sense too if say it Killing and Outlaw were fighting, BG could come out, nail Killings. BAMMO! NAO v. Killings/Konnan at the next PPV. Match would be okay at best, but at least it would have some continous story behind it.

I think you mean Flair vs. Savage. Steamboat retired in '94. Yup, that's what I meant. God knows what I was thinking, because I actually didn't like the Steamboat v Flair 1994 matches. -=Mike Yeah Savage/Flair on GAB 95 was very good along with Wright v. Pillman. That PPV had those two good matches and a bunch of shit following.

The Boogie Knights back together. The most entertaining thing in WCW, 2000 era. I second IRS, Shamrock and 3-Count as well.

JJ Dillon and Kevin Sullivan had a meeting with Spike TV about possibly starting a new wrestling project. According to sources, Hulk Hogan's name came up as a part of the project and he didn't know know about. They used his name as leverage to try to get Spike interested. Hogan was said to be extremely upset about the deal as he's back with WWE now and had no idea his name had been used. Credit - PW Insider, and ProWrestling.com Discuss!

Jillian Hall is a fantastic wrestler my friend, lets hope she wrestles.

AWESOME.. AWESOME.. interview. I love Styles.

Shocker still seems to be in the match.. On TNAWrestling.com... they have replaced Kash with TBD (to be determined) but Shocker is still there, so it looks as if Shocker is a go.

I'd be HUGE for Sharky being in the match. Who doesn't love Shark Boy?

If it isn't Dutt.. I have a feeling it will be Petey Williams. That way they can toss A-1 (Alister Rose) into the Tag Title Match, who will play more of a Bobby Roode role, with Eric Young.

The funny thing is.. CHRISTIAN ALWAYS LOSES... exactly like the Rock used to do. He loses so much, yet the crowd still loves him because he just oozes with charisma and he does his gimmick so perfectly.

Maybe they gave Cena the US Title so they can have a Two Falls Match at Judgement Day.. and have JBL go home with the US Title, to give him some gold.

I think Hogan will bump the buyrate, just because it is so close to the Hall of Fame ceremony and the fans popping huge for him.. Just my take.

With all the stuff floating around the main event and the interaction between them.. and the less the small card so far... what's the chances of this? Triple H v. Batista Hassan/Daivari v. Hogan/Michaels Y2J v. Benjamin Edge v. Benoit Viscera v. Kane Heart-Throbs v. Regal & Tajiri Any chance of Flair v. Lawler added in? I'd be all for seeing that match again.. just for nostogalia.... Although I'd rather have Christian get on the card... And I don't think their will be a womens title match. Christian and Tomko may just destroy Hurricane & Rosey on Heat, with Christian getting a segment about how he was left off the card after taking Batista to the limit just one week ago.

Update For The Backlash Card... 3 Stages Of Hell Winner v. Winner - Hell In The Cell Triple H v. Batista - Falls Count Anywhere Christian v. Ric Flair - Submission IC Championship; Shelton Benjamin v. Muhammed Hassan Tag Team Titles; The Rockers v. Randy Orton & Chris Jericho Womens Championship; Trish Stratus v. Molly Holly w/ Special Ref Christy Hemme Edge v. Chris Beniot Chris Masters v. Tyson Tomko (not really any build yet.. but now that Tomko is pretty much a face with Christian, this would be added) Kane v. Simon Dean + Maven (haha the smart mark thing, wait for next weeks RAW) Heat La Resistance v. Regal & Tajiri v. Hurricane & Rosey v. Richards & Venis *ORDER TODAY* <<< haha.

If Christian gets drafted to Smackdown, they god well BETTER take Tomko too. And the way Christian said he.. he said he should be the 1st pick.. does that mean that they're actually going to be able to pick talent.. I'm not sure how that'd work. Oh and Edge is a pretty good heel to me.. I enjoy him (mostly because of his entrance)... but Christian just blows him away. Christian's been my favoruite since they first came out as a team.

I love Lisa Copeland... Anyone who bashes Lita that hard is just fine in my books... Edge gets a bit of a pass because he entertains me.. and for some reason I'm getting the feeling that Lita was the one who started it all. I hope Matt and Lisa are fine after this.. Because they both seem like great people.. Matt Hardy is one of the nicest guys you could ever meet, as I met him before, he talked for longer than most "famous" people do. Lisa seems nice and caring, making sure the divorce was settled, before getting involved with Edge, because she cares about peoples feelings.. %^$ YOU LITA.