In Credible

really funny show, great one liners

Just got the game, and I suck ass. I also really hate Seth, what a fucking bastard.

Frolfin ain't easy...

I'm guessing she did the "removing the firing pin" trick that she used before.

Kelso made me laugh a lot last night. "I like her...she's got girl balls" (Elliot says something about that being the chair J.D. sat in the 3rd time they kissed) "Oh, how romantic...I'll try to stop drilling farts into it."

The show is getting much better, and actually I don't mind the lead character, she's still not that great, but getting better.

Go Wolves!

I've hated every Rob Zombie movie so far, he just doesn't get it. He chooses bad actors and gets bad performances out of them. House of 1000 Corpses sucked, Devil's Rejects was better, but was still pretty bad. And he totally whiffed on Halloween. Michael Myers is my favorite horror villain and as a kid, he scared the shit out of me. His motives were mysterious and his mask made his killing even more unsettling (shows absolutely no emotion). The thing that Zombie didn't realize is what many film makers don't, the unexplained and the unseen is the most frightening tool in a story tellers arsenal. When you try to explain Michael Myers or give him motivations you just turn him into another serial killer with a mask. It's like when you are building up a monster in a movie, you may hear it at the door and it could make the most horrific sounds. No matter what you show when you finally show it, it will be a let down. The imagination of each viewer will create something infinitely more frightening than you could possibly put on screen. Carpenter made a great decision in not explaining the why behind Myers. People think it's lazy, but no matter how he would have explained it, it wouldn't have had the same effect.

Because that would go against it was meant for. The reason they used the giant squid is so that there would be speculation that it was alien, it wasn't actually supposed to be an alien invasion.

I don't mind not using the squid (though in the story it makes sense, but would be harder to explain in movie form imo), but making it Dr. Manhattan as the cause is just dumb. It's supposed to be an event that not only shocks (and horrifies), but also unites the world. Manhattan would just make Russia happy, America's Superman turns on them. Like I said if they can find an alternative to the squid that's fine, but I don't think the mentioned way of changing it keeps the right feel.

Yeah as soon as I saw Bobbi J I knew it would be gold.

I liked it, it made me laugh a lot. That's what I look for in a comedy.

To answer OP's question, No.

Super drunk Charlie was just all kinds of awesome.

I think most of the issues are with the lead character. She seems like she went to the Michelle Rodriguez school of acting, where she has to act tough all of the time and never shows any vulnerability or female characteristics. The reason Garner worked so well in Alias is that when she needed to she would be tough and strong, but when things really effected her, she would show it when she was alone. I don't like how they tacked on her boyfriend being involved in shady things, but I guess they didn't want it to be too much like the start of Alias. The problem is she can't convey the emotion needed to really sell the relationship and the effect of his betrayal.

Solid show, it's basically Sopranos with bikers.

If you want to try to trade for my CB lvl. 29 he's pretty bad ass. He has 99 PDs in 48 games as well as 8 INTs and 6 Ffum

I laughed pretty hard at Gorilla Mask.

Yeah I think they need to write the main character a bit better. They are making her look like Keanu Reeves or something. It may be the actress though, but it doesn't seem like they are giving her much to work with. Jennifer Garner sold me on Alias, this chick has yet to get me hooked on Fringe.

Well, if Gus fails this weekend, then Chilly will have to start taking the blame for this team underachieving.

You can give a lot of the credit for getting a good group together to the owner. He spent a lot of money to get the guys Childress wanted, but I think they have big issues in the play calling. The offense lacks any imagination and it's supposed to be a West Coast offense, but has almost no quick passing. If you can't win with the tools that this team has I think the blame goes to the head coach. It's like giving a Ferrari to a blind person.

I don't get it, the Vikes have lost two close games one team went deep in the playoffs last year, and the other is two years removed from Super Bowl champs. Tarvaris isn't great, but I don't think Ferrotte is the answer either. I don't see how you can call the Vikings a bust, they've played close games against top teams and have been in it at the end each time. Again I blame a lot of the struggles on the coaching staff, also they need to cut Shiancoe, that guy is a fucking joke.

I decided Sunday to switch from Big Ben at QB to Jay Cutler for Fantasy Football. It worked out alright.

Ugh please fire Childress. Terrible play calling, and please draft a good QB (or go after one in FA).

It just seemed like you folks went and AWOLed it during and after the Vikes-Packers game. I saw you post in the thread last week, talking about how the Pack's 0 combined starts with their QBs was LOL funny, despite the fact that Jackson, with all of those 13 starts under his belt, tanked it and ours ended up wih a 116 QB Rating and the win. I was mostly talking about the rookie backups in GB which seems dumb imo, but how often do you see a stat like that with 0 starts out of the 3 QBs on a team? Tarvaris didn't play as badly as a lot of people make it out, I think most of it falls on the coaching staff. Sure Jackson was inaccurate on a lot of throws, but it really seemed like they had him on a leash in the first half. The second half he played pretty well and just made a bad throw at the end. It happens, the game really could have gone either way quite easily and the fact that we played horribly and still had a chance to win at the end makes me feel better about it.