Guest hebtheeagle Posted October 3, 2003 Report Posted October 3, 2003 that Triple H will be out for the rest of the year filming 2 movies, and getting his fuck on....er, marrying Stephanie McMahon...I may be wrong!
Guest Salacious Crumb Posted October 3, 2003 Report Posted October 3, 2003 Yeah. The funny part is his real starring role is in a movie the WWF had written.
Ted the Poster Posted October 3, 2003 Report Posted October 3, 2003 Yeah, I read the premise for HHH's "movie" and I have three words: "direct to DVD". No, wait, make that six words: "direct to reel-to-reel projector".
DerangedHermit Posted October 3, 2003 Report Posted October 3, 2003 Yeah, I read the premise for HHH's "movie" and I have three words: "direct to DVD". No, wait, make that six words: "direct to reel-to-reel projector". No. Make that four words: "Direct to Fresh Kills."
Ted the Poster Posted October 3, 2003 Report Posted October 3, 2003 Or maybe five words: "Bullet to the writer's head".
Guest Salacious Crumb Posted October 3, 2003 Report Posted October 3, 2003 Actually the WWF is pushing for a theater release.
humongous2002 Posted October 3, 2003 Report Posted October 3, 2003 That movie won't make it to dvd, maybe betamax.
Steviekick Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 If HHH can survive in Hollywood, more power to him.
Dangerous A Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 You folks that are hating HHH should be hitting your knees and praying to whatever god it is you pray to that HHH makes it in Hollywood. If he makes it there, then he won't be on your tv fucking up Raw. (although Raw is going to suck balls without him as well) With all the injuries he's had in the last 2 years, I could see HHH staying in Hollywood trying to be an actor. Let him succeed there, dammit. It's much easier to avoid him at a theatre than if he's on tv.
Highland Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 We'll all miss HHH when he's gone. Admit it.
Guest Your Olympic Hero Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 We'll all miss HHH when he's gone. Admit it. I'd rather watch HHH vs. Goldberg a hundred times before watching Nash vs. Goldberg once. So yes, I admit it.
Jack_Bauer Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 I wanna see Triple H do well in Hollywood to RID HIM FROM THE RING ... ... too much emphasis on that ?
Guest Dynamite Kido Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 I prefer 5 words Never Work In Hollywood Again
Guest TripleHater Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 DA,How Is RAW Gona SUCK W/Out HHH? Its Been Sucking For A While Now But IT Will Be BETTER W/Out Him...
Lord of The Curry Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 Agreed. Can a MOD give this torch a warning or something?
Lil' Bitch Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 I'm going to enjoy another HHHiatus while it still lasts.
Dangerous A Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 DA,How Is RAW Gona SUCK W/Out HHH? Its Been Sucking For A While Now But IT Will Be BETTER W/Out Him... Raw w/out HHH has 1) An Unover Goldberg as champ 2) Shane vs Kane with Shane getting the better of the feud as the top program 3) Austin, a non wrestler, getting the better of anyone who crosses his path. 4) Nash returning into a top spot against Goldberg 5) The building up of Randy Orton, who most believe is not ready for the spot he's being groomed for I could go on, but this is just beating my head against the wall. Raw w/out HHH will suck just as hard. It's just the HHHaters will somehow try to make like Raw is better with no HHH. Raw w/ HHH = Raw w/out HHH
Dangerous A Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 I don't hate HHH as much as your average HHHater, but I don't like him much either. I feel he still has one good thing left to do before he hopefully goes away and that's elevate the next ME'er to be a star. The trick is to get him to put a guy over before they are ruined by the awful writing and booking. HHH put Goldberg over clean and all, but by the time he did it, irrepairable damage had already been done to him by booking him to look like shit.
Dangerous A Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 Goldberg isn't over? Goldberg pops the crowd, but he isn't over as a draw for buyrates or ratings.
King Cucaracha Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 Goldberg isn't over? Goldberg pops the crowd, but he isn't over as a draw for buyrates or ratings. Neither is RVD, but he's over as hell. What's your point?
Dangerous A Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 There is a difference between being over as a crowd pleaser and being over in regards to getting people to watch you. Goldberg and RVD can get the live crowd behind them. They are charismatic and unique enough that most crowds will pop for them when they see them. However, these 2 guys do not draw ratings. They get the people who are already there watching into things, but they do not get other people to watch/buy ppv's. If Dusty Rhodes came back to WWE for one shot, he'd be over. He knows how to work and pop a crowd. However he will not draw any NEW viewers to the table. He will not get people to fork over $35.00 for a ppv to see him wrestle. Same with Goldberg. He pops the crowd, but look at the numbers. Buyrates are shit with him and he hasn't drawn any higher numbers in ratings since he's been on board. There is a difference between being over with the current crowd that is going to go to WWE shows regardless of how bad the product is and being over in regards to drawing more viewers to watch your television shows and buy ppvs.
Lil' Bitch Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 To be fair though, PPV buyout rates have been shitty since Backlash 2001. And the McMahon matches aren't helping either.
Dangerous A Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 Actually WM and Summerslam buyrates since Backlash 2001 have been very good. It's the other shows that have suffered tremendously since WM17. The reason Goldberg and RVD aren't over as ratings/buyrate draws is incompetent writing and booking, not because of their talents or lack of charisma.
Guest TheGame2705 Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 To be fair though, PPV buyout rates have been shitty since Backlash 2001. And the McMahon matches aren't helping either. Neither are Brock and Angle.
Lil' Bitch Posted October 4, 2003 Report Posted October 4, 2003 Neither are Brock and Angle. Angle / Lesnar > McMahon / McMahon
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now