Guest JRE Report post Posted October 6, 2003 The first being Undertaker vs. Kane. Which I can't complain about- it could be good storyline wise. As for quality...well....Taker has improved leaps since the horrible Summerslam 2000 match- and Kane...is pretty much the same- but it could be alright. The other: Goldberg vs. Triple H for the World Title. Bleh- I guess it's a nice long-term storyline coming to an end...but it's nothing that excites me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Austin3164life 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 Source? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest JRE Report post Posted October 6, 2003 They're rumors, you don't need a source (But I found them at Wrestlezone, I dunno where they stole them from) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbacon 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 Ah, jeez *considers selling WM tickets* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Just call me Dan 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 Triple H eating goldberg for the title at Wrestlemania would just kill me. The Booker match really killed any of my excitement for the show at 19, and I can't imagine him pulling a Nash and going over. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 Goldberg's going to be around that long? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Just call me Dan 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 Go back to your boycott thread if you want to spout your Goldberg hatred. We get the point, and you can move on. In the meantime, why don't you just answer the question instead of this repetitive crap? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spiny norman 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 JCMD, Triple H is going to eat Goldberg!? I don't know why you're so against seeing this, as it would be entertaining, if not slightly barbarous. Aren't Undertaker and Kane on different shows? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CronoT Report post Posted October 6, 2003 JCMD, Triple H is going to eat Goldberg!? I don't know why you're so against seeing this, as it would be entertaining, if not slightly barbarous. Aren't Undertaker and Kane on different shows? For the "Biggest WrestleMania of All Time," I'm pretty sure they will put people on opposite shows to face each other. Maybe we'll get Lesnar vs. Goldberg for the Re-Unification of the Undisputed World Title. Or maybe we'll see Lesnar vs. Triple H, and finally see Triple H be the bitch this time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted October 6, 2003 They'll save the intrabrand matches for another ppv, UT can easily be "brought" over to Raw to stop Kane's rampage... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest wrestlingbs Report post Posted October 6, 2003 They'd better do Austin vs. Goldberg. I know Austin's neck is screwed up but that would be too big of a march to skip. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spaceman Spiff 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 Neither of those matches pique my interest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SamoaRowe 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 The only match from above that would interest me in the slightest would be Undertaker vs Kane. Why? Because logic DEMANDS that this match happen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jester 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 Or maybe we'll see Lesnar vs. Triple H, and finally see Triple H be the bitch this time. Rumor has it that HHH wants to be a face. If he's going to be a face at WM20, no way is he jobbing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KTID 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 Because he always jobs at WrestleMania since he's a heel. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Just call me Dan 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 Well the only time he jobbed at 'Mania was as a heel, so I'd say his chances of jobbing as a heel are much greater than superman babyface HHH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 A WM rematch with Undertaker at another WM? Interesting... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord of The Curry 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 What's interesting about it? It sucked then and chances are it will suck now. Even if Undertaker brings his MAT SKILLZ~! to the match, I doubt he could carry Kane. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MarvinisaLunatic 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 HHH/Steph vs Vince/Sable main event Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Real Nosferatu Report post Posted October 6, 2003 A motivated Kane and UT can be good. Glen Jacobs is not bad for a big man. He just can't wrestle lazy slugs and non-wrestlers. Undertaker's first WM loss will be to Kane I hope. UT never jobbed to Kane on a big show that I'm aware of so, he kinda owes him it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest hhheld_down Report post Posted October 6, 2003 id love to see kane be monster that stops the undertakers winning WM streak.. it would get Kane over huge... and then he could fight HHH for the title at Backlash and HHH could "destroy the monster" and piss on all of us ONCE AGAIN Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haVoc 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 He wouldn't be pissing on me. I'd much rather see Triple H have the title attached to his hip then see Kane as champion. Learn from history, Kane never stays hot for too long. WWE always screws it up. Kane gets hot, gets put in a tag team with X-pac. Kane gets hot, fucks Katie Vick. Kane gets hot, Shane steals his heat and there are so many other times I'm missing. All in all, I could care either way what happens with Kane. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 *Nelson points and laughs at the people who bought WMXX tickets* Just how would they build up Taker/Kane? I'm assuming it's not going to be for the title. Will they just have the announcers shill for it, them running in on each show, or give one or both of them a "go to any show you wish" pass? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haVoc 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 For starters, they need to have Raw Vs Smackdown matches at Survivor Series. Kane and Taker can cross paths around this time. Let it die down and then have them cross paths and battle in the Royal Rumble. Then somehow decide which one will go to Raw or Smackdown so they can feud at Mania. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbacon 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 *Nelson points and laughs at the people who bought WMXX tickets* Hey man, these things are selling for double and even triple their price on Ebay, so if this is the way the show is shaping up come early February then there's no loss in getting rid of them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChick 0 Report post Posted October 6, 2003 HHH vs. Goldy, huh? So instead of actually making new stars, they just use the same ones over and over again. Makes sense. I'm surprised that they would think about keeping the belt of Goldberg that long. For some reason, I get the feeling that when the ratings tank with Goldberg as champ, he won't have the belt for long. And Taker vs Kane again? Sure, we haven't seen it in a good while, but I was kind of hoping it would stay that way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Super Pissed Smark Report post Posted October 6, 2003 I know I can barely contain my excitement with these matches. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Suicide King Report post Posted October 7, 2003 I read in an interview (sorry that I don't remember the publication) that when 'Taker retired, he wanted to wrestle Kane in a retirement match at Wrestlemania. Do you suppose this means that the time has come? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Just call me Dan 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2003 I should hope not. Looking at his in-ring performances in the past year, I surely don't mind him gutting it out for a few more years. It would be nice to say "I retired at Wrestlemania 20", but I don't think he will. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2003 I should hope not. Looking at his in-ring performances in the past year, I surely don't mind him gutting it out for a few more years. It would be nice to say "I retired at Wrestlemania 20", but I don't think he will. While Taker has been on the upswing, it might not be a bad idea to go out in March with a win over Kane. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
