SamoaRowe Posted October 27, 2003 Report Posted October 27, 2003 Umm...Angle matches... what sticks out.... 2000: No Way Out: *** vs Chris Jericho WrestleMania: ***1/2 vs Jericho and Benoit Fully Loaded: *** against Undertaker SummerSlam: *** against Triple H and The Rock Note: I didn't see many 2000 PPVs... I was cheap at the time... 2001 Royal Rumble: **** against HHH No Way Out: **** against The Rock WrestleMania: **** against Benoit Backlash: *** against Benoit Judgement Day: *** against Benoit Cage match: **** against Benoit KOTR: **** against Shane McMahon Summerslam: **** against Austin That ends 2001 shows that I saw/cared about. 2002: Backlash: *** against Edge Vengeance: ***1/2 against Rock and Undertaker Summerslam: **** against Rey Mysterio Unforgiven: ***1/2 against Benoit No Mercy: **** with Benoit against Edge/Mysterio Armegeddon: *** against Big Show 2003 Royal Rumble: Still haven't seen the match... not my fault, don't have Kazaa anymore and haven't had the right opportunity to buy the DVD. No Way Out: *** in that handicap match. WrestleMania: ****1/2 against Lesnar Vengeance: **** against Lesnar and Big Show Summerslam: ***1/2 against Lesnar Iron Man Match: ***1/2 against Lesnar Smackdown: ***1/2 against Undertaker My humble opinions and all...
clean rob Posted October 27, 2003 Report Posted October 27, 2003 2002. Not only was he putting on 3-4* matches all year long with the 'Smackdown Six', he was also being an absolute carry machine, dragging watchable matches out of shitheaps like Mark Henry. 2001 had better storylines for Angle, but his ringwork last year was on fire. I must be the only person ever who found the hairpiece thing amusing. Oh well.
Guest TripleHater Posted October 27, 2003 Report Posted October 27, 2003 2002. Not only was he putting on 3-4* matches all year long with the 'Smackdown Six', O YES! I enjoyed those Matches. Angle/Beniot/Los Guerreros/Edge/Rey....They Wrestled too much IMO,Fued lasted too long too IMO But no doubt they put on Great Matches.
Guest NCJ Posted October 27, 2003 Report Posted October 27, 2003 2001 was the best year overall. Great match with Rock at No Mercy. Grat matches with Benoit. Incredible fued with Austin. Made to look like a top guy. Why so many people hate his 2002 year is beyond me. No one takes on main eventers all year unless your name is HHH or Austin. Angle did lose to Edge, but it was no accident he got his heat back. He made Hogan tap out. The first person to ever do that. He never lost cleanly to anyone other than Edge the entire year, and he put on great matches with a wide variety of opponents. 2000 was the first time he sniffed the main event. It was definately his breakout year. Honestly he will probably be at his best next year.
Lord of The Curry Posted October 27, 2003 Report Posted October 27, 2003 Umm...Angle matches... what sticks out.... 2000: No Way Out: *** vs Chris Jericho WrestleMania: ***1/2 vs Jericho and Benoit Fully Loaded: *** against Undertaker SummerSlam: *** against Triple H and The Rock Note: I didn't see many 2000 PPVs... I was cheap at the time... 2001 Royal Rumble: **** against HHH No Way Out: **** against The Rock WrestleMania: **** against Benoit Backlash: *** against Benoit Judgement Day: *** against Benoit Cage match: **** against Benoit KOTR: **** against Shane McMahon Summerslam: **** against Austin That ends 2001 shows that I saw/cared about. 2002: Backlash: *** against Edge Vengeance: ***1/2 against Rock and Undertaker Summerslam: **** against Rey Mysterio Unforgiven: ***1/2 against Benoit No Mercy: **** with Benoit against Edge/Mysterio Armegeddon: *** against Big Show 2003 Royal Rumble: Still haven't seen the match... not my fault, don't have Kazaa anymore and haven't had the right opportunity to buy the DVD. No Way Out: *** in that handicap match. WrestleMania: ****1/2 against Lesnar Vengeance: **** against Lesnar and Big Show Summerslam: ***1/2 against Lesnar Iron Man Match: ***1/2 against Lesnar Smackdown: ***1/2 against Undertaker My humble opinions and all... That 6 minute squash-fest at Fully Loaded vs Taker was ***? Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
Lord of The Curry Posted October 27, 2003 Report Posted October 27, 2003 2001 was the best year overall. Great match with Rock at No Mercy. Grat matches with Benoit. Incredible fued with Austin. Made to look like a top guy. Why so many people hate his 2002 year is beyond me. No one takes on main eventers all year unless your name is HHH or Austin. Angle did lose to Edge, but it was no accident he got his heat back. He made Hogan tap out. The first person to ever do that. He never lost cleanly to anyone other than Edge the entire year, and he put on great matches with a wide variety of opponents. 2000 was the first time he sniffed the main event. It was definately his breakout year. Honestly he will probably be at his best next year. Made to look like a top guy? Oh fuck, keep 'em comin' guys, this Angle stuff is comedy gold.
King Cucaracha Posted October 27, 2003 Report Posted October 27, 2003 Well, the match arguement has been covered...as for character, which is half of Angle's appeal, 2000 was probably best because he got over with the goofy, comedic yet straight wrestler stuff. And the love triangle made him a bonafide star. 2001 with Austin was classic, and the first half of the year was ok enough. But I absoultely LOATH face Angle, especially the pro-USA version they used at the start of the Invasion. He just looks and sounds too desperate for fan appeal sometimes as face. 2002 let him become a serious tag wrestler, and his feud with Benoit was good...gave him chance to do comedy. Plus he got the good side of his face persona out a couple of times. But it was nothing special, and the Edge fued made him look TOO much of an idiot. There's a fine line between goofy and a total goof. 2003 he's been booked seriously...but the face turn again killed it for me. He can be good as a face...the midget stuff was mildly entertaining, but the rapping should be kept for Cena. And the less said about the Angle-Lesnar 'friendship' the better.
Guest NCJ Posted October 27, 2003 Report Posted October 27, 2003 Lord of The Curry Posted on Oct 27 2003, 03:20 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QUOTE (NCJ @ Oct 27 2003, 08:16 PM) 2001 was the best year overall. Great match with Rock at No Mercy. Grat matches with Benoit. Incredible fued with Austin. Made to look like a top guy. Why so many people hate his 2002 year is beyond me. No one takes on main eventers all year unless your name is HHH or Austin. Angle did lose to Edge, but it was no accident he got his heat back. He made Hogan tap out. The first person to ever do that. He never lost cleanly to anyone other than Edge the entire year, and he put on great matches with a wide variety of opponents. 2000 was the first time he sniffed the main event. It was definately his breakout year. Honestly he will probably be at his best next year. Made to look like a top guy? Oh fuck, keep 'em comin' guys, this Angle stuff is comedy gold. How the Fuck was he not made to look like a top guy in 2001. When Austin turned he was the one who went after him and beat him. When the WWE beat the Alliance he was the mole who helped turn the tide of battle. In 2001 Angle was made into a top talent. There is no way around it. Hell he has main evented a fucking WM. He is a top guy. People who are bitching that Angle isn't getting enough of a push are just looking for something to complain about. He even made the fucking Undertaker tap out. Not a top guy in the company??? give me a break.
Guest TripleHater Posted October 27, 2003 Report Posted October 27, 2003 WrestleMania: **** against Benoit . I watched the match for like the 10th time last night and I still say ***.The match wasn't that good IMO.
Murmuring Beast Posted October 27, 2003 Report Posted October 27, 2003 2001. The Summerslam and Unforgiven matches were excellent. The latter had me in tears. YOU BIG BASTARD AUSTIN~!
Guest Anglesault Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 I must be the only person ever who found the hairpiece thing amusing. Oh well. He's wearing a wig! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No.
Guest Ray Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 Ahhhhh! Christ, I'm blind!! The flurry of snowfakes has blinded me!!! Ahhhh!!
Austin3164life Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 I think Kurt Angle's best year was 2001. He really stood out from the rest of the roster that year (as did Benoit and Austin). He still hasn't gotten everything down in the ring yet, but he has time left.
Lord of The Curry Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 Lord of The Curry Posted on Oct 27 2003, 03:20 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QUOTE (NCJ @ Oct 27 2003, 08:16 PM) 2001 was the best year overall. Great match with Rock at No Mercy. Grat matches with Benoit. Incredible fued with Austin. Made to look like a top guy. Why so many people hate his 2002 year is beyond me. No one takes on main eventers all year unless your name is HHH or Austin. Angle did lose to Edge, but it was no accident he got his heat back. He made Hogan tap out. The first person to ever do that. He never lost cleanly to anyone other than Edge the entire year, and he put on great matches with a wide variety of opponents. 2000 was the first time he sniffed the main event. It was definately his breakout year. Honestly he will probably be at his best next year. Made to look like a top guy? Oh fuck, keep 'em comin' guys, this Angle stuff is comedy gold. How the Fuck was he not made to look like a top guy in 2001. When Austin turned he was the one who went after him and beat him. When the WWE beat the Alliance he was the mole who helped turn the tide of battle. In 2001 Angle was made into a top talent. There is no way around it. Hell he has main evented a fucking WM. He is a top guy. People who are bitching that Angle isn't getting enough of a push are just looking for something to complain about. He even made the fucking Undertaker tap out. Not a top guy in the company??? give me a break. Yadda fuckin' yada. The guy is STILL a retard, he STILL acts like a retard in the ring, he STILL cuts dumbass promo's and he STILL gets himself into idiotic "comedy" segments. Yeah, he's a serious wrestler that Kurt Angle. Do people know that there's a difference between wrestling in the main event and being treated like a main event wrestler?
clean rob Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 I must be the only person ever who found the hairpiece thing amusing. Oh well. He's wearing a wig! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No. Yes, yes...we all know you're a big Angle mark and you hate it when he's made to look like anything but the toughest wrestler in the company, or made to job to anyone. But I think Angle's got really good comic delivery at times, and when he came out after having his head shaved, and claimed that it had all grown back, I couldn't help but chuckle. I know it's hardly sophisticated comedy, but haven't you ever watched something you knew was bad, but were entertained anyway? (e.g. WWE) I'm probably in a minority, but half of what I LIKE about Angle is the fact that despite his in-ring ability and toughness, his character comes across as being totally goofy. It's a world away from the usual HHH-style "I'm a badass that's gonna kick everyone in" character that we've all seen a million times over. The fact that he goofs around a lot makes it more exciting when he gets all serious, and makes him seem more like a real character to me.
Guest NCJ Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 Yadda fuckin' yada. The guy is STILL a retard, he STILL acts like a retard in the ring, he STILL cuts dumbass promo's and he STILL gets himself into idiotic "comedy" segments. Yeah, he's a serious wrestler that Kurt Angle. Do people know that there's a difference between wrestling in the main event and being treated like a main event wrestler? I agree there is a difference, but The Rock in between title runs does alot of stupid angles and goofy shit, and he is still considered a main eventer and is over. He has jobbed to Billy Gunn in a fued about ass, jobbed to Al Snow countless times, lost to the Hurricane, lost to Rhyno, jobbed to the fucking Big Bossman, and has brought out midjets in stupid comedy angles. So is he not treated nlike a main event wrestler. I guess five straight years of having one of the top three high profile matches on WM means nothing. The announcers still put him over as the people's champion just like they still put Angle over as the Olympic Gold Medalist and the best pure wrestler. Angle has jobbed to Edge, Brock, and Benoit that is it. He is consistently at the top of the card, and when he losses it is made into a big deal. Yes sometimes I think his character should be more serious, but that is part of what makes Kurt Angle who he is. It is not like he has ever been totally burried at anytime in his career in the last three years.
KTID Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 ^^^ That's because he's The Rock. Angle, however, isn't even close.
Guest NCJ Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 In a sense that is true to a mark, but you have to admit Angle has looked alot stronger in between runs with the title than The Rock has.
Guest BionicRedneck Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 2000: Fully Loaded: *** against Undertaker Royal Rumble: **** against HHH KOTR: **** against Shane McMahon Summerslam: **** against Rey Mysterio Armegeddon: *** against Big Show WrestleMania: ****1/2 against Lesnar Vengeance: **** against Lesnar and Big Show Iron Man Match: ***1/2 against Lesnar HAHAHAHA! Those in particular are pure gold! Angle's best year would be 2002, IMO. His best work in 2001 was down to the other guy (Stone Cold) and his work this year has pretty much blew. Outside of the Benoit match at RR and possibly the Taker match on SD!, what as Angle done this year? He has been involved in 4 dissapointing matches with Brock Lesnar, one of which was pure shat (Iron man) and exposed Angle big time.
Jack_Bauer Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 I enjoyed his 2001 and 2002 work equally. 2001 : His matches with Austin were excellent, as was his match with Shane McMahon at King of the Ring. He had his good match with Triple H at the Royal Rumble. He had is great match with The Rock at No Way Out. At Wrestlemania, he and Chris Benoit tore the ring up with an excellent mat based match, and then they did it again at the next two PPVs. All of the matches were good, but the Backlash match dragged a bit. Move onto Summerslam, Unforgiven, Vengeance and many TV matches with Steve Austin. All of the matches with those two were usually superb. No Mercy had ANOTHER good match involving Kurt and Austin but this time included RVD. 2002 : Had an okay match with Triple H, which was about as good as people could do at this point, because The Game was REALLY going downhill. He then had an okay match with Kane, but again, that was excusable, and he managed to help the match achieve a big match feel as well. We then come onto his matches with Edge at King of the Ring and Judgement Day, and then the Cage Match and normal match on Smackdown. These were all REALLY great matches and a testament to the work of Angle, who really did a great job guiding Edge ( NOT complete carry jobs, as Edge did hold up well ) to great matches. We move onto Hulk Hogan. Hulk Hogan put Angle over and gave Angle a huge boost with his heat, as he made Hogan tap cleanly. Kurt Angle then moved into the Smackdown six for the rest of the year, untill he defeated The Big Show to cap of the year. So, I believe that 2001 was better workwise, but 2002 was better from a markout point of view ( I like Angle a lot ) so I would say it's pretty much even.
Guest Anglesault Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 I must be the only person ever who found the hairpiece thing amusing. Oh well. He's wearing a wig! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No. I know it's hardly sophisticated comedy, It's idiot nine year old comedy that has no place on a show geared towards adults.
clean rob Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 ^^^ (rubs eyes) ...did you just refer to Smackdown as a show geared towards adults? Yes, now I think about it, Kurt's hairpiece angle really did look pretty stupid next to all those dramatic backstage segments, those heartfelt and beautifully delivered promos and all those really clever, well-scripted comedy pieces that Smackdown has been delivering on a weekly basis these past few years.
Guest Anglesault Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 ^^^ (rubs eyes) ...did you just refer to Smackdown as a show geared towards adults? Yes, now I think about it, Kurt's hairpiece angle really did look pretty stupid next to all those dramatic backstage segments, those heartfelt and beautifully delivered promos and all those really clever, well-scripted comedy pieces that Smackdown has been delivering on a weekly basis these past few years. It's a "male soap opera" with gratuitous sex amongst other things. They aren't going for the fourth grade demographic, aka the only people who find a man wearing a wig funny.
clean rob Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 Ah...the classic "you are clearly 12 years old" insult. Oof! Hitting me where it hurts, eh? If they're not going for this demographic which you speak of, why do they have scantily-clad women (of interest to: young males with no access to porn, say 12-14) and comedy angles like men spraying raw sewage at each other appearing on the show every week. I see it like this: I have a younger cousin of age 11. He, and half his mates at school all watch Smackdown every week and talk about wrestling, play the games etc. all the time. I know of no-one of my age in the area with any interest in it whatsoever. The kids are watching it, no-one else is so I'd say it's being aimed at kids (young adults, whatever.) I seem to have missed all the gratuitous sex that was shown.
Lord of The Curry Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 That raw sewage thing was a comedy angle? I thought it was an inside joke by management on Show.
Guest Ray Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 2000: Fully Loaded: *** against Undertaker Royal Rumble: **** against HHH KOTR: **** against Shane McMahon Summerslam: **** against Rey Mysterio Armegeddon: *** against Big Show WrestleMania: ****1/2 against Lesnar Vengeance: **** against Lesnar and Big Show Iron Man Match: ***1/2 against Lesnar HAHAHAHA! Those in particular are pure gold! Indeed~! At Wrestlemania, he and Chris Benoit tore the ring up with an excellent mat based match, and then they did it again at the next two PPVs. All of the matches were good, but the Backlash match dragged a bit. Eh...I wouldn't call the Backlash or Judgement Day matches "good." I'll get raped for this, but... I wouldn't rate any Angle match over ****.
Guest Anglesault Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 Ah...the classic "you are clearly 12 years old" insult. Oof! Hitting me where it hurts, eh? If they're not going for this demographic which you speak of, why do they have scantily-clad women (of interest to: young males with no access to porn, say 12-14) Next time I see a 14 year old rolling on the floor because he saw someone wearing a hairpiece, I'll let you know. If they're going for the young teens (and I think they're going for 17-24) "man wearing a wig" is STILL way off. I've spent time with kids like 14-15-16 (cousins, brothers of friends, whatever) and NONE of them have ever gone into a fit of laughter over a toupee
clean rob Posted October 28, 2003 Report Posted October 28, 2003 Hmmm....what I said: I think Angle's got really good comic delivery at times, and when he came out after having his head shaved, and claimed that it had all grown back, I couldn't help but chuckle. What you just said: rolling on the floor because he saw someone wearing a hairpiece Try to keep on track, eh AngleSault? Do you not think Angle has good delivery of comic lines? Personally, I think he has nice timing, and can get a couple of laughs even out of some relatively mediocre, silly material. I never claimed the wig thing was anything but, but on that occasion Kurt's big goofy grin and cracking delivery made me smile. I'd be intrigued to know what sort of comedy stuff you'd put on WWE television, AS. What sort of stuff do you think the demographic they're after would find funny? And you're not allowed to say none.
Guest Anglesault Posted October 29, 2003 Report Posted October 29, 2003 Hmmm....what I said:I think Angle's got really good comic delivery at times, and when he came out after having his head shaved, and claimed that it had all grown back, I couldn't help but chuckle. What you just said: rolling on the floor because he saw someone wearing a hairpiece Try to keep on track, eh AngleSault? "a chuckle" is good for maybe five minutes on one show. This went on FOR A WHOLE MONTH. He went through this extremely stupid sophmoric humor for a whole month so someone could CHUCKLE? I'd be intrigued to know what sort of comedy stuff you'd put on WWE television, AS. What sort of stuff do you think the demographic they're after would find funny? And you're not allowed to say none. I haven't a clue what could be so hilarious that it could be a main point of the show for a month. So, with that in mind, maybe they should focus on something other than comedy, because they clearly can't comprehend the boundaries of it.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now