Jump to content

Wrestlemania XX rumored card


Recommended Posts

Guest reshad974
Posted

let's get a look at the rumored card

 

Undertaker vs Kane : 6 years after their first encounter at Wrestlemania XIV, they are still fighting each other

 

Steve Austin vs Vince McMahon : 6 years after their initial feud, they are still fighting each other

 

TripleH vs Mick Foley : 4 years after their last feud (and retirement match), they are still fighting each other

 

Ric Flair vs Rick Steamboat : 15 years after their great feud (and matchs), they are still fighting each other

 

Enough said.....

Guest JumpinJackFlash
Posted

Think Positive Everyone! :D :) :D :) :D :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:stupid: :bonk:

Guest hunger4unger
Posted

No doubt Taker vs Kane, Goldberg vs Lesnar and a 6 man tag involving HHH, Austin, Rock, Foley and whoever else. I've no interest in seeing Flair vs Steamboat. Hang on a sec..how about The Rock vs Michaels? That'll draw.

Posted

Learn from years past that you never should expect what will happen until at least two weeks before the show.

 

Idea's change. People get injured. People lose their smiles.

Guest hunger4unger
Posted

Yeah cos HBK isn't over or anything or arguably the most talented performer that has ever graced a WWE ring.

Guest hunger4unger
Posted

A good worker = fans know they will see a good match = they buy the PPV. I can't be bothered to to go and get PPV buys from when HBK was on top (which, incidently, was a bad time for WWF all round...ANYONE as champ would not have set the world on fire during that period due to a very poor roster and the popularity of WCW) so can you tell me?

Guest hunger4unger
Posted

Hogan at his peak was a better draw than HBK was i'm not arguing that.

Posted
A good worker = fans know they will see a good match = they buy the PPV. I can't be bothered to to go and get PPV buys from when HBK was on top (which, incidently, was a bad time for WWF all round...ANYONE as champ would not have set the world on fire during that period due to a very poor roster and the popularity of WCW) so can you tell me?

They were low but never as low as Bret/Sid at It's Time, the worst buyrate of the year or Bret/Bulldog from Dec 95 which is the lowest WWF buyrate of all time. Bad Blood 97 also had the highest IYH PPV buyrate of that year, even beating out Canadian Stampede. So if Shawn couldn't draw a dime, what does that make Bret?

Posted

Actually HBK was the most successful champ until Austin in the 1990s. Keller did a piece on it in his 1996 yearbook. House shows were up, buyrates were up and he stablized the roster. Not to mention he headlined Mania 14. Of course some of you never let facts get in the way of a stupid opinion. Just because people were more successful after him it does not mean HBK did not draw.

Posted

I'd like to see the article, actually.

 

I've never heard anyone refer to HBK as a great draw - granted, not a horrible draw, but nothing overly good.

 

And I'd have a hard time believing he did better then Hogan.

 

And don't you think that Mike Tyson and Austin had a lot to do with the WM 14 buyrate?

 

I stand by my original point. Being a talented wrestler does NOT mean that you're also a good draw. Good wrestlers CAN be good draws, but it's not a guarantee.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...