Propose class-action lawsuit over Jackson's boob

[EricMM 0]

I would say, if you're offended by sexuality, the pantomined sex of the performance would be more offensive than skin.

 

It's just that everyone knows you can't protest dancing, even if it is boarderline. But skin is currently "taboo"

 

It's shocking that this woman is offended by basic, honest to god skin.

 

People didn't ALWAYS wear clothes, you know.

 

Hell, God WANTED us to be naked, Mrs. Christian

[Guest El Satanico]

God also wanted us to smoke pot...fuck law enforcement for making us disobey god.

[Kahran Ramsus 0]

I think they can in Ontario

 

Well, that's where I live. There was a big issue about it about 10 years back, and I know it was eventually ruled by the Ontario Court of Appeals that it was okay. I don't know whether it was taken to the Supreme Court after that or not.

[Highland 0]

God also wanted us to smoke pot...fuck law enforcement for making us disobey god.

The line of the night.

[cynicalprofit 0]

30 guys being paid millions of dollars to play a childrens game, and their collages rank as low as drug dealer to murders.

HUH?

Spelling error, ment colleges(A body of persons having a common purpose or shared duties)

 

Ray Caruth is a murder, Oj probably is, and the horrible things football players do just goes on and on.

[Perfxion 0]

OJ was found not guilty. People have moved on to the new celeb flavor of the month. Please move on.

 

And what I think you meant to say it is this.

 

"I was more offended by the 87 millionares on the field who can screw up half of the time and still get millions when some people have been accused of murders(former teammate to the Panters), rapist(every sport has this), drug users(some players on the raiders) to even drug dealers(supply and demand)."

[Spicy McHaggis 0]

OJ was found not guilty.

And liable for wrongful death.

[lomasmoney 0]

OJ was found not guilty.

And liable for wrongful death.

which is like being found liable for vehicular manslaughter while being drunk, when the criminal court already said that you weren't drunk or in the car when the crime occured

[Guest tSlater]

"Serious injury"? Where do people come up with this stuff?

Well you see she's really a lesbian, and she orgasmed at the sight of the boob. She kinda fell down and hit her head on the corner of some coffee table.

 

.....

 

it's a boob. All women, have boobs (or so I would hope so). Get over it.

 

Oh no, maybe your child saw the boob. Big whoop. I walked in on my mom once when I was 5 and saw her boob. It didn't "injure" me any. And if a child is, say, 13, big whoop I bet he's got several pornographic magazines he's already looked at.

 

When it comes to things like this, a lot of other countries just don't care "oh, it's a breat, next?". It seems the U.S. and a lot of those Middle-Eastern countries are the only ones who throw tissy fits whenever something insignificant such as a boob is shown on tv.

[Guest Danny Dubya v 2.0]

tSlater : The incident injured her by devouring the woman's moral fiber from the inside. The irregular spraying of "indecency"-fearing bullshit on the American populace suddenly became much more regular and less solid.

 

And for the love of earth, it was just Janet Jackson, that enough made me apathetic from the start. In that photo they first took of her, she vaguely resembled an extra off the set of Planet of the Apes. I'm more displeased over the two people used for the stunt than the stunt itself or the fucktards involved (collectively, MTV and every person/group suing them.)

[Firestarter 0]

I've been skimming through every article I could find on this silly stunt, because so many people (though no one I know personally, thank goodness) are in such an uproar over it, and I wanted someone to explain to me why it was at all important. I finally found a column that expresses my feelings exactly.

 

Something to talk about by Rod Smith

 

I hear things, usually accompanied by self-righteous sighs, like, "I am really angry. My family was just not ready for this!" and I wonder what limited conversations take place in the family that discussing piggish behavior on behalf of two entertainers is so difficult.

 

What occurred is just not that tough to talk about, unless what it is really about is unclear.

 

All that needs said is: "Dear child, what you just saw, and probably missed, on our TV, in our living room, was two people who have lots of money, lots of fame and no manners. They have no respect for each other, their families, their fans or their country. I hope nothing you ever do will reflect what you have seen today."

[Highland 0]

I've been skimming through every article I could find on this silly stunt, because so many people (though no one I know personally, thank goodness) are in such an uproar over it, and I wanted someone to explain to me why it was at all important. I finally found a column that expresses my feelings exactly.

 

Something to talk about by Rod Smith

 

I hear things, usually accompanied by self-righteous sighs, like, "I am really angry. My family was just not ready for this!" and I wonder what limited conversations take place in the family that discussing piggish behavior on behalf of two entertainers is so difficult.

 

What occurred is just not that tough to talk about, unless what it is really about is unclear.

 

All that needs said is: "Dear child, what you just saw, and probably missed, on our TV, in our living room, was two people who have lots of money, lots of fame and no manners. They have no respect for each other, their families, their fans or their country. I hope nothing you ever do will reflect what you have seen today."

Interesting article, and quite right too.

[EdwardKnoxII 0]

Alright guys... let's file a class-action lawsuit against this lady. Serious head trauma will result from millions of people who bang their heads into the wall or desk every time someone files a frivelous lawsuit.

 

Y'all with me?

[Prime Time Andrew Doyle 0]

This is just stupid. Her eyes must be really sharp to be able to see the quick shot they had of it. Stupid shit like this just makes the Justice system seem ridiculous(sp?). There is absoloutly no possible way that this lady could have suffered a injury. I hope that the lawyer screws her with his fees, hoepfully that will teach stupid people like this a lesson

[tommytomlin 0]

I hate threads where everyone agrees.

[Guest tSlater]

I hate threads where everyone agrees.

mmkay then. Personally I do agree with everybody else, but I'll just play the role of a dis-agreeing person then. (I can't remember the word to use there)

 

I think it's disgusting that CBS could allow such a sexually explicit act happen on TV. My 10yo son (I don't really have a son just work with me here) was watching the super bowl, and now he's going around ripping girl's clothing off, and was suspended from school yesterday for it. I think it's good that this lawsuit is being filed.

[Guest MikeSC]

I hate threads where everyone agrees.

Well, the woman's suit IS idiotic (why doesn't she sue herself for the times she's seen herself naked if the breast is THAT damaging?).

 

NOW, if we were to discuss the FCC investigation into the incident and whether it is necessary (I'd actually argue yes, and will leave it at that as I'm sure THAT will cause a bit of an uproar), it'd be a different story.

-=Mike

[Spicy McHaggis 0]

I hate threads where everyone agrees.

mmkay then. Personally I do agree with everybody else, but I'll just play the role of a dis-agreeing person then. (I can't remember the word to use there)

 

I think it's disgusting that CBS could allow such a sexually explicit act happen on TV. My 10yo son (I don't really have a son just work with me here) was watching the super bowl, and now he's going around ripping girl's clothing off, and was suspended from school yesterday for it. I think it's good that this lawsuit is being filed.

What was sexually explicit about it?

[Guest The Satanic Angel]

CNN news article

 

The lawsuit has been dropped (reality hit her like a ton of bricks).

 

The sexually explicit part was the rest of the performance, most likely including Nelly grabbing his crotch.

 

I don't see the point made, however. The FCC, et. al was already beginning to investigate before this lawsuit came out.