Nader to Jump in Presidential Race

[Guest Cerebus]

OMGFAUX...You know the rest. A boon for Bush I guess. But it doesn't matter b/c all the other canidates are exactly alike so it won't matter which gets in right?

[Guest MikeSC]

OMGFAUX...You know the rest. A boon for Bush I guess. But it doesn't matter b/c all the other canidates are exactly alike so it won't matter which gets in right?

Bah. Nader is useless and the Green Party is an openly Socialist group.

-=Mike

[kkktookmybabyaway 0]

I like Ralph. He makes me laugh...

[Henry Spencer 0]

In the 2000 election, my middle school had a mock election, and the stoner population managed to give it to Nader.

[Guest cobainwasmurdered]

*likes Nader but wouldn't vote for him*

[Rob E Dangerously 0]

I'd say that Nader will get alot less support, considering how he'd hurt the Democrats more than Bush

 

If the Nader supporters moved to a safe state like Utah, then that wouldn't be too harmful overall.

[EVIL~! alkeiper 0]

In the 2000 election, my middle school had a mock election, and the stoner population managed to give it to Nader.

I think most school mock elections tend to vote for the third party. Our school had elections in '92 and '96 that went for Perot.

[BX 0]

According to Nader, he isn't running as a Green this time.

[The Amazing Rando 0]

I predict this campaign will be struck in the rear by another campaign, catch fire, and explode.

[Vyce 0]

Will this spark another round of Democrats whining that he cost them the election?

 

Nader will have as much effect now as he did then - zilch.

[kkktookmybabyaway 0]

In the 2000 election, my middle school had a mock election, and the stoner population managed to give it to Nader.

My mock election -- back in '92 -- gave it to Perot, of which I voted for...

[Rob E Dangerously 0]

my school's election went for the incumbent in 92/96.. but these were 1st/5th graders

[Henry Spencer 0]

Our mock election in '96, when I was in third or fourth grade, went to Dole, most likely because I live in Dole's home state, which the teacher mentioned constantly, and nine year olds know jack shit about politics.

[MarvinisaLunatic 0]

I voted for Nader in 2000, but I don't think I'll vote for him again.

[Rob E Dangerously 0]

I voted for Nader in 2000, but I don't think I'll vote for him again.

Thanks alot Marvin..

 

[The Ghost of bps21 0]

I voted for him last time.

 

I'm proud to say that since the election was held up until Florida was recounted...Nader...he hung on for a long time!

[Guest Cerebus]

It seems Democrats will be far less tolerant for a Nader campaign than 2000.

 

Edited to add: It's official. He's running.

[Spaceman Spiff 0]

In the 2000 election, my middle school had a mock election, and the stoner population managed to give it to Nader.

My mock election -- back in '92 -- gave it to Perot, of which I voted for...

Oh yeah, top this:

 

Jerry Brown/Howard Stern ticket got our nomination.

[Jobber of the Week 0]

Nader has set his own agenda back by his constant running.

 

Why not actually do something to build up a third party from the ground floor, and run for Congress? It would actually give you strong chance to win.

[Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0]

The Nader vote will likely be cancelled out by 10 Commandments Roy Moore, who looks like he's going to run a third party candidacy as well.

[Dr. Tom 0]

The Nader vote will likely be cancelled out by 10 Commandments Roy Moore, who looks like he's going to run a third party candidacy as well.

Truly the apocalypse is at hand.

[MrRant 0]

*Picks up gun*

 

So when do we start the raping, looting and pilliaging?

[Dr. Tom 0]

When Comcast buys Disney.

 

[MrRant 0]

So in about 6 months?

 

*Puts down gun*

[Guest MikeSC]

Nader has set his own agenda back by his constant running.

 

Why not actually do something to build up a third party from the ground floor, and run for Congress? It would actually give you strong chance to win.

Thing is, he already promised Terry McAuliffe (well, according to Terry) that he won't criticize the Democratic nominee at all.

 

So, WHY, precisely, is he running? Because he can't win the Democratic nomination?

-=Mike

[snuffbox 0]

I really dont 'get' all the hate for third parties...it usually always comes from people with strong ties to one of the two main parties, and it really seems very un-democratic.

[snuffbox 0]

So, WHY, precisely, is he running?

Possibly, because he feels strongly enough about his ideals/beliefs/ideas that he will run for predident of the United States. He is a man of himself, not a polititian of one party or the other.

[Guest MikeSC]

 

So, WHY, precisely, is he running?

Possibly, because he feels strongly enough about his ideals/beliefs/ideas that he will run for predident of the United States. He is a man of himself, not a polititian of one party or the other.

If he feels only one side is worthy of condemnation, then he's not a third-party candidate. He's just another Democratic nominee.

-=Mike

[snuffbox 0]

 

So, WHY, precisely, is he running?

Possibly, because he feels strongly enough about his ideals/beliefs/ideas that he will run for predident of the United States. He is a man of himself, not a polititian of one party or the other.

If he feels only one side is worthy of condemnation, then he's not a third-party candidate. He's just another Democratic nominee.

-=Mike

Did you watch Meet the Press tonight Mike?

[Guest MikeSC]

 

So, WHY, precisely, is he running?

Possibly, because he feels strongly enough about his ideals/beliefs/ideas that he will run for predident of the United States. He is a man of himself, not a polititian of one party or the other.

If he feels only one side is worthy of condemnation, then he's not a third-party candidate. He's just another Democratic nominee.

-=Mike

Did you watch Meet the Press tonight Mike?

This morning, actually, and Nader is the same boring, tedious, "Why the heck do hippies LIKE this guy" man he always was.

 

I'm referring to McAuliffe's claim that Nader swore to him that should Nader run for office, he won't criticize a Democratic nominee. If he only criticizes one nominee, then how is he independent?

-=Mike

...And many points off for that lame "Supreme Selected..." crack. Jesus, that is REAL weak