More --- from an f'tard

[Guest MikeSC]

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...cx_tr_uc/latest

 

OK, will SOMEBODY do something about this handjob gone awry?

-=Mike

[JoeDirt]

I like Sherman's Lagoon better.

[C Dubya 04]

Yeah, this guy's really not witty, funny, creative or from what I can tell intelligent. He just tries to be as much of an asshole as possible to get attention.

[Ripper]

Okay, WHAT?

 

He took a story, exaggerated it and made a Cartoon. Isn't that what EVERY political Cartoon does? What is so HORRIBLE about this one.

 

And how can Mike be so sensitive and such a shoot first ask questions later guy?

[Guest cobainwasmurdered]

It's lame and all but I think a person who suggests nuking a country is a bit more of a fucking retard.

[C Dubya 04]

True, but this guy's comic just sucks. They put it in the local city paper here and it has never once been funny. I hate when people are just trying to get negative publicity.

[Guest Agent of Oblivion]

Meh. It's avg rating is 3.1 That sounds about right to me. Totally average political cartoon. How this is at all newsworthy is beyond me.

[Zorin Industries]

The last panel made me smile, but that was all

[Giuseppe Zangara]

Appropriate title/poster combination.

[Guest Dids]

Why Ted Rall sucks

[snuffbox]

For purposes or summary:

 

Good and proper - Bombing a country for the purpose of "killing em all"

 

Horrible terrible - Using a media vehicle, the political cartoon, to voice displeasure at a nation's military shortcomings

 

Good - Genocide

 

Bad - Questioning leadership

[Guest Dids]

For purposes or summary:

 

Good and proper - Bombing a country for the purpose of "killing em all"

 

Horrible terrible - Using a media vehicle, the political cartoon, to voice displeasure at a nation's military shortcomings

 

Good - Genocide

 

Bad - Questioning leadership

I've participated in several message board discussions with Rall, and I totally agree with his politics. It's just that when he tries to make his point he goes for sensationalism and outrage.

 

He's a smart guy who makes dumb comics.

 

He's also an asshole who can't take a joke and sued somebody because of it.

[Your Paragon of Virtue]

There was a British comic that had Tony Blair on GWB's leash. It was two birds with one stone.

 

I can't find the comic. Any Brit folks could lend a hand here. I mention it because I'm sure it would offend many on this board as well, if the one in this thread did.

[Jingus]

Rall comes off kinda like a lot of guys I know; the ones who simply have no idea what the words "restraint" or "subtlety" mean.

[Your Paragon of Virtue]

Here's another one that most will find stupid...or funny

[Guest Dids]

Catchy- I like it.

[Your Paragon of Virtue]

It's not meant to be taken OH SO SERIOUS~! but I think that most people in CE wouldn't like it anyway, or they'd think it's dead-on. No one really has a sense of humour.

 

I wonder if the people in GC are as conservative as most of the people in the CE folder.

[Guest Dids]

My only beef is that they used the photoshopped upside down book picture. There's so much that actually wrong with Bush, why use made- up stuff?

[snuffbox]

For purposes or summary:

 

Good and proper - Bombing a country for the purpose of "killing em all"

 

Horrible terrible - Using a media vehicle, the political cartoon, to voice displeasure at a nation's military shortcomings

 

Good - Genocide

 

Bad - Questioning leadership

I've participated in several message board discussions with Rall, and I totally agree with his politics. It's just that when he tries to make his point he goes for sensationalism and outrage.

 

He's a smart guy who makes dumb comics.

 

He's also an asshole who can't take a joke and sued somebody because of it.

That post was in referance to MikeSC....plenty of gung-ho, kill em all gusto, but no military participation...

 

He apparently has an issue with a comic strip but offers brilliant strategies such as 'bomb em all' for foreign relations affairs.