Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
EVIL~! alkeiper

Is X a HOFer?

Recommended Posts

Frank Thomas should make the Hall on the first ballot. .429 career OBP. In his prime, he was nearly as feared as Barry Bonds is today.

^^^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
::reads thread title::

 

Of course I am.

Not enough posts

 

Also is questionable when it comes to clutch-posting

He posted using performance-enhancing drugs.

t1_grab4.jpg

THAT IS PREPOSTEROUS VITAMIN X HAS NEVER AND WILL NEVER USE POST ENHANCING DRUGS AND TO EVEN INSINUATE SO IS AN INSULT TO THE CREDIBILITY OF THE BOARD AND ALL IT REPRESENTS

Well by using Stephen A. in a BASEBALL thread, and when you do, not mentioning the Lakers, nor saying "HOWEVER," nor typing in the biggest font possible, you're right. You're not posting on performance-enhancing drugs. You're on performance-reducing drugs.

 

 

 

BURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC

I don't remember if it's been asked, but what about Jim Edmonds or Larry Walker?

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't remember if it's been asked, but what about Jim Edmonds or Larry Walker?

-=Mike

Both were asked.

 

Why must every baseball player decline the Blue Jays hat? I understand Rocket, but Dave Winfield didn't and Alomar will probably not do it either. Argh.

 

Here's an interesting one; Roger Maris.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IIRC, Al's said he doesn't think Piazza is a HoFer, so the hat issue would be moot

 

If I'm wrong, apologies in advance to Al

Mike Piazza's been a HOFer for three years now. He's the greatest hitting catcher of all time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't remember if it's been asked, but what about Jim Edmonds or Larry Walker?

    -=Mike

Both were asked.

 

Why must every baseball player decline the Blue Jays hat? I understand Rocket, but Dave Winfield didn't and Alomar will probably not do it either. Argh.

 

Here's an interesting one; Roger Maris.

Maris no. He was only a very good player for two years, and he wasn't THAT great even then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't remember if it's been asked, but what about Jim Edmonds or Larry Walker?

    -=Mike

Both were asked.

 

Why must every baseball player decline the Blue Jays hat? I understand Rocket, but Dave Winfield didn't and Alomar will probably not do it either. Argh.

 

Here's an interesting one; Roger Maris.

Maris no. He was only a very good player for two years, and he wasn't THAT great even then.

I think he should be voted in for 'Historical Reasons'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's the Hall of Fame.

 

Not the Hall of Pretty Good with Two Very Good Seasons

I say he should be in.

 

But, I dont get to vote for a reason...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I'll ask. Craig Biggio? And for the sake of argument, he plays 2 more years and gets to 3000 hits. He'd end up with career totals of around 270 homers, 630 doubles, 1100 RBIs, and maybe about 60 triples.

 

I'd say in, but people come up with all sorts of reasons why he shouldn't be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X
::reads thread title::

 

Of course I am.

Not enough posts

 

Also is questionable when it comes to clutch-posting

He posted using performance-enhancing drugs.

t1_grab4.jpg

THAT IS PREPOSTEROUS VITAMIN X HAS NEVER AND WILL NEVER USE POST ENHANCING DRUGS AND TO EVEN INSINUATE SO IS AN INSULT TO THE CREDIBILITY OF THE BOARD AND ALL IT REPRESENTS

Well by using Stephen A. in a BASEBALL thread, and when you do, not mentioning the Lakers, nor saying "HOWEVER," nor typing in the biggest font possible, you're right. You're not posting on performance-enhancing drugs. You're on performance-reducing drugs.

 

 

 

BURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRN

So, in other words, you agree with me.

 

Thanks!

 

EDIT: Forgot to defend my use of Stephen A. Smith. I used him more in a "I'M MAKING MY POINT WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT AND I RULE AND YOU SUCK" kind of way rather than the typical way. Obviously the meaning was lost on you.

 

Stephen A Smith: The metaphor for hardheaded idiocy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK I'll ask. Craig Biggio? And for the sake of argument, he plays 2 more years and gets to 3000 hits. He'd end up with career totals of around 270 homers, 630 doubles, 1100 RBIs, and maybe about 60 triples.

 

I'd say in, but people come up with all sorts of reasons why he shouldn't be.

In. Along with the 2,600 hits, he has a .373 career OBP. Biggio was also a superior defender, and he played the vast majority of his career in the Astrodome, which severly reduced offense. He was a fantastic percentage basestealer, and he almost never grounded into a double play. At first glance, his numbers are unimpressive. But when you put them in context, he is a clear HOFer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Al, I'm going to hit you up with a few selections that might be unconventional...

 

Davey Johnson (as player, manager, or both)

Pat Gillick (as an executive, obv)

Jon Miller (broadcaster's wing)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not Al, but...

 

Davey Johnson the player is a definite no

 

Davey Johnson the manager is a tough call. He took 3 out of 4 teams he managed to the playoffs and won a WS, but, aside from the Mets stint (6.5 years), his tenures were very short (3 in Cincy, 2 each in Baltimore and LA), supposedly because he even makes Bill Parcells look hospitable.

 

Another thing I just noticed was that during his Mets tenure they finished 2nd in the East every year they didn't go to the postseason, which means he kept them as perenial contenders, even though it would be hard not to with that lineup (HoF catcher, possible HoF 1st baseman, eventual NL MVP, the best young hitter of the time and the best young pitcher of the time)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest The Shadow Behind You

Other Managers

 

Lou Pinella

Joe Torre

Bobby Cox

Jack McKeon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about the poster children of the steroid age, especially in light of a "smoking gun" in the Bonds/Balco case

 

Barry Bonds

Mark McGwire

Sammy Sosa

 

Don't laugh, some say Orlando Cepeda's drug bust was the reason writers kept him out of the HOF

 

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking, it would be hilarious if the writers decided to keep Barry out of the Hall, just as a big fuck you for all the stuff he did over the years, and to help fuel one of his RACISM! tirades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Al, I'm going to hit you up with a few selections that might be unconventional...

 

Davey Johnson (as player, manager, or both)

Pat Gillick (as an executive, obv)

Jon Miller (broadcaster's wing)

Davey Johnson yes. He brought EVERY team he managed into contention.

 

Gillick I'm inclined to say no. I don't want to say yes unless there's an overwhelming body of evidence to support it.

 

Jon Miller yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Most probably not, but worth a shot:

 

Paul O'Neill.

 

Nope.

 

Other Managers

 

Lou Pinella

Joe Torre

Bobby Cox

Jack McKeon

 

Pinella not yet, maybe someday. McKeon no. No one would have considered him before last season. Torre and Cox yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How about the poster children of the steroid age, especially in light of a "smoking gun" in the Bonds/Balco case

 

Barry Bonds

Mark McGwire

Sammy Sosa

 

Don't laugh, some say Orlando Cepeda's drug bust was the reason writers kept him out of the HOF

 

Steve

In, in and in. First off, McGwire took legal supplements. Second, there is no proof linking these men to illegal steroids. Third, regardless of what they did, the wins still count in the standings. I'd have no hesitation voting them in the Hall.

 

As for Cepeda, I can think of several reasons to keep him out without mentioning drug busts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe so. And I do think Steinbrenner should get inducted. Beyond the rings, the Yankees are a hugely successful, profitable franchise. No team in sports has done a better job building their name like the Yankees have done over the last decade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×