2GOLD Posted November 28, 2004 Report Posted November 28, 2004 Forget the Alexander crap for a minute. Spongebob took a HUGE dive, from 32 million to 8 million. Granted it already made the money back but I have no clue why it fell so hard. The movie is hilarious.
teke184 Posted November 28, 2004 Report Posted November 28, 2004 Forget the Alexander crap for a minute. Spongebob took a HUGE dive, from 32 million to 8 million. Granted it already made the money back but I have no clue why it fell so hard. The movie is hilarious. Polar Express came out. 'Nuff said.
Art Sandusky Posted November 28, 2004 Report Posted November 28, 2004 There's a NARRATOR in this film? Fuck.
Placebo Effect Posted November 28, 2004 Report Posted November 28, 2004 Isn't DiCaprio making an Alexander flick? I could've sworn I head about that somewhere. He'd make a better bisexual conqueror the Farrell. Oh, and DH- your sig is great. Yes, which is slated for 2006 release. Baz Luhrmann is directing it, Moulin Rouge and Romeo and Juliet. And Nicole Kidman is Olympias. He has been working on the film ever since Rouge was completed. I remember reading that in EW a while back. If you have the issue, read EW's article all about Alexander. That movie looked to be never getting made, nor will it ever now that this has happened. But yeah, I had a feeling this would be terrible. It's a shame, because I would have really liked to see America's reaction to a movie with homosexual undertones becoming a huge grosser.
Placebo Effect Posted November 28, 2004 Report Posted November 28, 2004 Forget the Alexander crap for a minute. Spongebob took a HUGE dive, from 32 million to 8 million. Granted it already made the money back but I have no clue why it fell so hard. The movie is hilarious. Damn. I'm sure Nickelodeon is more than happy, though. The point of the movie was to not only make money from the theatrical/DVD sales, but also to get more people aware of what Spongebob was, bringing out more and more marketing tie-in opportunities.
2GOLD Posted November 28, 2004 Report Posted November 28, 2004 Forget the Alexander crap for a minute. Spongebob took a HUGE dive, from 32 million to 8 million. Granted it already made the money back but I have no clue why it fell so hard. The movie is hilarious. Polar Express came out. 'Nuff said. Polar Express came out on the 10th, Spongebob came out on the 19th.
bob_barron Posted November 28, 2004 Report Posted November 28, 2004 Forget the Alexander crap for a minute. Spongebob took a HUGE dive, from 32 million to 8 million. Granted it already made the money back but I have no clue why it fell so hard. The movie is hilarious. Spongebob took in 17.8 over the weekend a drop of 44.4 percent
2GOLD Posted November 28, 2004 Report Posted November 28, 2004 Forget the Alexander crap for a minute. Spongebob took a HUGE dive, from 32 million to 8 million. Granted it already made the money back but I have no clue why it fell so hard. The movie is hilarious. Spongebob took in 17.8 over the weekend a drop of 44.4 percent My bad Bob, I thought the numbers were the box office totals. I should have known better. NATIONAL TREASURE is cleaning up. How I am not sure.
bob_barron Posted November 28, 2004 Report Posted November 28, 2004 Because it plays to everyone. It's an action movie, has an interesting plot, Cage/Bruckheimer connection and it's rated PG so families will see it
teke184 Posted November 28, 2004 Report Posted November 28, 2004 Because it plays to everyone. It's an action movie, has an interesting plot, Cage/Bruckheimer connection and it's rated PG so families will see it I think it's more Bruckheimer than Cage... Cage actively turns people off down my way, as he's done more than his share of shitty parts since Leaving Las Vegas.
Guest Smell the ratings!!! Posted November 28, 2004 Report Posted November 28, 2004 I saw Alexander yesterday, and it was not terrible. It was not good by any means, but it wasn't like Ishtar or something. The two fights, (and yes there are only two) are particularly good. that said, I don't suggest you spend the 7 bucks. Or 9, for our urban friends.
Art Sandusky Posted November 28, 2004 Report Posted November 28, 2004 How is Angelina Jolie in the film. She was another reason I wanted to see it.
Guest Cerebus Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 I saw Alexander with the family last friday on the insistance of my mother-in-law. It had good battle scenes but very campy dialogue and "serious" scenes. I laughed so hard during a scene where Hephistalon is swooning around in this incredibly stupid outfit that my wife kept punching me in the arm to keep me quiet. Of course, later on she joined me in laughing at Heph's even more unintentionally hilarious deathbed scene. It was no Battlefield Earth but this had to be one of the humerously bad big-budget movies in quite a while.
The Czech Republic Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 Because it plays to everyone. It's an action movie, has an interesting plot, Cage/Bruckheimer connection and it's rated PG so families will see it A treasure map on the Declaration of Independence?!?! Come on! That's like a Cheat Commandos sketch.
Star Ocean 3 Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 post pix of rosario dawson plz kthnx
Art Sandusky Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 National Treasure actually plays off of a lot of currently held beliefs that there's all kinds of stuff hidden in our national documents and seals based on the idea that many of the founding fathers were Masons and members of other secret societies.
razazteca Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 I saw Alexander yesterday, and it was not terrible. It was not good by any means, but it wasn't like Ishtar or something. The two fights, (and yes there are only two) are particularly good. that said, I don't suggest you spend the 7 bucks. Or 9, for our urban friends. I spent two fity on it and wanted to walk out of the theater......I was so close to sneaking into the theater next door to watch Seed of Chucky but did not. post pix of rosario dawson plz kthnx D cups.
Mole Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 How is Angelina Jolie in the film. She was another reason I wanted to see it. She is the best part of the whole movie.
Lord of The Curry Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 I saw Alexander yesterday, and it was not terrible. It was not good by any means, but it wasn't like Ishtar or something. The two fights, (and yes there are only two) are particularly good. that said, I don't suggest you spend the 7 bucks. Or 9, for our urban friends. I spent two fity on it and wanted to walk out of the theater......I was so close to sneaking into the theater next door to watch Seed of Chucky but did not. post pix of rosario dawson plz kthnx D cups. D cups? I need to rewatch the club scene in 25th Hour again, cause they looked around the C range in that flick.
Kahran Ramsus Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 When was the last time we had a truly great epic film not counting the LotR trilogy? Was it Gladiator back in 2000? Master & Commander: The Far Side of the World, just last year.
Downhome Posted November 29, 2004 Author Report Posted November 29, 2004 Ah, I always forget about that one. More than likely because I haven't watched it yet.
teke184 Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 The hard-and-fast way to recognize one is apparently the participation of Russell Crowe...
CBright7831 Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 From the Alexander IMDB trivia section: In December 2003 a group of homeless people in Stockholm, Sweden, started queuing for tickets to "Alexander", scheduled for premiere in November 2004. They intend to live in tents for a year, outside a movie theatre in the city centre. This silent protest, aimed to put focus on the situation for the homeless in the Swedish capitol, originates in a statement from a local politician, stating that it is both legal and fully acceptable for fans to go camping for weeks in central Stockholm, to get tickets to a movie premiere. The movie at issue then was _Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003)_ . Jesus, those guys waited a year, only to be disappointed.
Ravenbomb Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 When was the last time we had a truly great epic film not counting the LotR trilogy? Was it Gladiator back in 2000? Master & Commander: The Far Side of the World, just last year. Ugh, I hated Gladiator. Seeing as how I've not seen M&C, I'd go with Gangs of New York
lomasmoney Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 so wait they managed to get Angelia Jolie and Rosario Dawson in the same movie together, and only got one naked. Fuck you Oliver Stone, some nude lesbian action between those two would have gotten three or four viewings from me
SuperJerk Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 so wait they managed to get Angelia Jolie and Rosario Dawson in the same movie together, and only got one naked. Fuck you Oliver Stone, some nude lesbian action between those two would have gotten three or four viewings from me Which one got naked?
cabbageboy Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 I believe it was Rosario that got naked. Why wasn't Angelina as well? Not like she won't get naked too. As far as National Treasure goes, I wanted to see it mainly for the kind of cast it had. A Bruckheimer production starring Cage with Jon Voight, Harvey Keitel, Sean Bean as a heel, the retard kid from Gigli, and Helen of Troy....hell I was intrigued just seeing the poster. Odd for Bruckheimer it is a movie that has somewhat of an action edge while also staying in the PG range. That = money.
Guest Boomer Sprinklespax Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 For all the problems that Alexander had, I really think it was actually pretty decent. Overlong, yes, overstated, yes, kinda flat, yes, but bad? No, because it was at least marginally entertaining throughout, IMO of course. And Colin Farrell, whether anyone wants to admit it or not, was fucking awesome, especially in the climactic scene with the elephants. As a matter of fact, that entire scene was fucking awesome, as was Val Kilmer, as was Angelina the Great. I don't understand why everyone is shitting on this flick. Much worse movies came out this year...like Ray, for example, or Collateral. I'm serious about that, by the way.
Mole Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 Much worse movies came out this year...like Ray, for example, or Collateral. I'm serious about that, by the way. I didn't see either of those flicks, but I only heard good things about them. Your the first person to actually not like them, from what I've read.
Guest Smell the ratings!!! Posted November 29, 2004 Report Posted November 29, 2004 Jolie was Alexander's mother, so it would technically be bad taste for her to get naked with his wife. It would rule, obviously.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now